IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v102y2025ics1057521925002108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Board co-option and audit quality: Evidence from US

Author

Listed:
  • Alharbi, Samar S.
  • Saeed, Asif
  • Iqbal, Umer
  • Elommal, Najoua

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of board co-option on audit quality, a vital dimension of corporate governance that has received limited attention. Using a dataset of 9605 firm-year observations from U.S. listed firms, we examine the extent to which co-opted directors aligned with CEOs compromise audit quality, measured through BIG4 auditor selection and audit fees. Results show that board co-option significantly reduces audit quality, a finding robust to alternative co-option measures, propensity score matching, and IV-Probit models. Notably, the presence of a CSR committee and stronger governance scores mitigate these negative effects – highlighting their significant role. These findings accentuate the need for regulatory reforms to strengthen board independence and institutionalize CSR committees, enhancing governance practices and accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Alharbi, Samar S. & Saeed, Asif & Iqbal, Umer & Elommal, Najoua, 2025. "Board co-option and audit quality: Evidence from US," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:102:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925002108
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925002108
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104123?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Board co-option; Audit quality; BIG4; Corporate governance; Governance mechanism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:102:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925002108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.