IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v234y2021ics0360544221013748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative life cycle assessment of clean aviation fuels

Author

Listed:
  • Siddiqui, O.
  • Dincer, I.

Abstract

In this study, life cycle assessments and comparative evaluations are performed for different types of renewable and alternative fuels for aircrafts. The life cycle impacts of both hydrogen and ammonia fuels are primarily investigated considering conventional and renewable energy-based routes. The overall life cycle impacts of several hydrocarbon fuels including kerosene, ethanol, methanol, dimethyl ether, and biodiesel are also studied. The steam methane reforming-based route for hydrogen and ammonia fuels is found to have higher global warming potentials as compared to alternative production routes. High phosphate emissions result in a higher freshwater eutrophication potential for the solar-based route for ammonia fuel. Fossil fuel-based dimethyl ether is found to have a comparatively higher global warming potential of 1.3 kgCO2 equivalent per tonne-km amongst the considered hydrocarbon fuels that include ethanol (1.1 kgCO2 equivalent per tonne-km), kerosene (1.04 kgCO2 equivalent per tonne-km), methanol (1.01 kgCO2 equivalent per tonne-km), and biodiesel (1.07 kgCO2 equivalent per tonne-km). Dimethyl ether is found to entail high toxicity potentials and the reduction of life cycle arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, and lead emissions is recommended. However, higher photochemical ozone formation potentials of 0.0055 and 0.0046 kgNOx equivalent per tonne-km are associated with biodiesel and kerosene fuels respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Siddiqui, O. & Dincer, I., 2021. "A comparative life cycle assessment of clean aviation fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:234:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221013748
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221013748
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aydın, Hakan & Turan, Önder & Karakoç, T. Hikmet & Midilli, Adnan, 2013. "Exergo-sustainability indicators of a turboprop aircraft for the phases of a flight," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 550-560.
    2. Wang, Wei-Cheng, 2019. "Techno-economic analysis for evaluating the potential feedstocks for producing hydro-processed renewable jet fuel in Taiwan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 771-783.
    3. Baroutaji, Ahmad & Wilberforce, Tabbi & Ramadan, Mohamad & Olabi, Abdul Ghani, 2019. "Comprehensive investigation on hydrogen and fuel cell technology in the aviation and aerospace sectors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 31-40.
    4. Ranasinghe, Kavindu & Guan, Kai & Gardi, Alessandro & Sabatini, Roberto, 2019. "Review of advanced low-emission technologies for sustainable aviation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Yilmaz, Nadir & Atmanli, Alpaslan, 2017. "Sustainable alternative fuels in aviation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P2), pages 1378-1386.
    6. Uddin, Md Mosleh & Simson, Amanda & Wright, Mark Mba, 2020. "Techno-economic and greenhouse gas emission analysis of dimethyl ether production via the bi-reforming pathway for transportation fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    7. Koroneos, C. & Dompros, A. & Roumbas, G. & Moussiopoulos, N., 2005. "Advantages of the use of hydrogen fuel as compared to kerosene," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 99-113.
    8. Staples, Mark D. & Malina, Robert & Suresh, Pooja & Hileman, James I. & Barrett, Steven R.H., 2018. "Aviation CO2 emissions reductions from the use of alternative jet fuels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 342-354.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lai, Y.Y. & Christley, E. & Kulanovic, A. & Teng, C.C. & Björklund, A. & Nordensvärd, J. & Karakaya, E. & Urban, F., 2022. "Analysing the opportunities and challenges for mitigating the climate impact of aviation: A narrative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Kroyan, Yuri & Wojcieszyk, Michał & Kaario, Ossi & Larmi, Martti, 2022. "Modeling the impact of sustainable aviation fuel properties on end-use performance and emissions in aircraft jet engines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. Andrea J. Boero & Kevin Kardux & Marina Kovaleva & Daniel A. Salas & Jacco Mooijer & Syed Mashruk & Michael Townsend & Kevin Rouwenhorst & Agustin Valera-Medina & Angel D. Ramirez, 2021. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Ammonia-Based Electricity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aygun, Hakan & Turan, Onder, 2021. "Exergo-economic analysis of off-design a target drone engine for reconnaissance mission flight," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Aygun, Hakan & Turan, Onder, 2022. "Application of genetic algorithm in exergy and sustainability: A case of aero-gas turbine engine at cruise phase," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    3. Ziya Sogut, M., 2021. "New approach for assessment of environmental effects based on entropy optimization of jet engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    4. John Vourdoubas, 2021. "Is the De-carbonization of Air-transportation to and from the Island of Crete, Greece Feasible?," Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 62-75, August.
    5. Qiu, Rui & Hou, Shuhua & Meng, Zhiyi, 2021. "Low carbon air transport development trends and policy implications based on a scientometrics-based data analysis system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-10.
    6. Balli, Ozgur & Caliskan, Hakan, 2021. "Turbofan engine performances from aviation, thermodynamic and environmental perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    7. Yu, Jinglei & Shao, Chaofeng & Xue, Chenyang & Hu, Huaqing, 2020. "China's aircraft-related CO2 emissions: Decomposition analysis, decoupling status, and future trends," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Hamdan, Sadeque & Jouini, Oualid & Cheaitou, Ali & Jemai, Zied & Granberg, Tobias Andersson & Josefsson, Billy, 2022. "Air traffic flow management under emission policies: Analyzing the impact of sustainable aviation fuel and different carbon prices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 14-40.
    9. Aygun, Hakan & Erkara, Seref & Turan, Onder, 2022. "Comprehensive exergo- sustainability analysis for a next generation aero engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    10. Escalante, Edwin Santiago Rios & Ramos, Luth Silva & Rodriguez Coronado, Christian J. & de Carvalho Júnior, João Andrade, 2022. "Evaluation of the potential feedstock for biojet fuel production: Focus in the Brazilian context," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Prussi, Matteo & Lee, Uisung & Wang, Michael & Malina, Robert & Valin, Hugo & Taheripour, Farzad & Velarde, César & Staples, Mark D. & Lonza, Laura & Hileman, James I., 2021. "CORSIA: The first internationally adopted approach to calculate life-cycle GHG emissions for aviation fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    12. O’Connell, Adrian & Kousoulidou, Marina & Lonza, Laura & Weindorf, Werner, 2019. "Considerations on GHG emissions and energy balances of promising aviation biofuel pathways," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 504-515.
    13. Song, Zaixin & Liu, Chunhua, 2022. "Energy efficient design and implementation of electric machines in air transport propulsion system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    14. Mikulčić, Hrvoje & Ridjan Skov, Iva & Dominković, Dominik Franjo & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Tan, Raymond & Duić, Neven & Hidayah Mohamad, Siti Nur & Wang, Xuebin, 2019. "Flexible Carbon Capture and Utilization technologies in future energy systems and the utilization pathways of captured CO2," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Jagroop Singh & Somesh Kumar Sharma & Rajnish Srivastava, 2019. "AHP-Entropy based priority assessment of factors to reduce aviation fuel consumption," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(2), pages 212-227, April.
    16. Xirui Li & Junqi Tang & Weidong Li & Qingmin Si & Xinyao Guo & Linqing Niu, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Aviation Carbon Emissions Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, March.
    17. Cheong, Kin-Pang & Wang, Guochang & Si, Jicang & Mi, Jianchun, 2021. "Nonpremixed MILD combustion in a laboratory-scale cylindrical furnace: Occurrence and identification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    18. L. Hay & A. H. B. Duffy & R. I. Whitfield, 2017. "The S‐Cycle Performance Matrix: Supporting Comprehensive Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Technical Systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 45-70, January.
    19. Mayeres, Inge & Proost, Stef & Delhaye, Eef & Novelli, Philippe & Conijn, Sjaak & Gómez-Jiménez, Inmaculada & Rivas-Brousse, Daniel, 2023. "Climate ambitions for European aviation: Where can sustainable aviation fuels bring us?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    20. Pons-Prats, Jordi & Živojinović, Tanja & Kuljanin, Jovana, 2022. "On the understanding of the current status of urban air mobility development and its future prospects: Commuting in a flying vehicle as a new paradigm," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:234:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221013748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.