IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v113y2016icp227-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CCGT unit commitment model with first-principle formulation of cycling costs due to fatigue damage

Author

Listed:
  • Wogrin, Sonja
  • Galbally, David
  • Ramos, Andrés

Abstract

Combined cycle gas turbine power plants (CCGTs) play a key role in modern electric power systems due to their operational flexibility and the firmness they provide to the networks where they operate. Due in part to this flexibility and firmness, the function of CCGTs has experienced a significant evolution with the advent of intermittent renewable energy sources such as wind: CCGTs are increasingly required to rapidly vary load levels in order to counterbalance the fluctuations of renewable energy sources and satisfy overall system demand. The purpose of this paper is to develop a methodology that can be used for assessing the optimal operational strategy of a CCGT when subjected to cycling requirements. This is achieved by introducing a unit commitment formulation that takes into account useful life expenditure costs due to fatigue damage accumulation associated to cycling. The case studies presented in this paper show that neglecting fatigue cycling costs when making operational decisions generates suboptimal cost and profit outcomes for CCGT operators. Furthermore, it is shown that profitability of CCGTs is compromised in systems with very significant penetration of intermittent renewable energy sources, due to the increase in cycling costs derived from continuous load-following operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wogrin, Sonja & Galbally, David & Ramos, Andrés, 2016. "CCGT unit commitment model with first-principle formulation of cycling costs due to fatigue damage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 227-247.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:113:y:2016:i:c:p:227-247
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216309343
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colpier, Ulrika Claeson & Cornland, Deborah, 2002. "The economics of the combined cycle gas turbine--an experience curve analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 309-316, March.
    2. Alobaid, Falah & Postler, Ralf & Ströhle, Jochen & Epple, Bernd & Kim, Hyun-Gee, 2008. "Modeling and investigation start-up procedures of a combined cycle power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(12), pages 1173-1189, December.
    3. Tuohy, Aidan & Meibom, Peter & Denny, Eleanor & O'Malley, Mark, 2009. "Unit commitment for systems with significant wind penetration," MPRA Paper 34849, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Troy, Niamh & Denny, Eleanor & O'Malley, Mark, 2010. "Base-load cycling on a system with significant wind penetration," MPRA Paper 34848, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhao, Ziwen & Ding, Xinjun & Behrens, Paul & Li, Jianling & He, Mengjiao & Gao, Yuanqiang & Liu, Gongcheng & Xu, Beibei & Chen, Diyi, 2023. "The importance of flexible hydropower in providing electricity stability during China’s coal phase-out," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    2. González-Gómez, P.A. & Gómez-Hernández, J. & Ruiz, C. & Santana, D., 2022. "Can solar tower plants withstand the operational flexibility of combined cycle plants?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    3. Taler, Jan & Taler, Dawid & Kaczmarski, Karol & Dzierwa, Piotr & Trojan, Marcin & Sobota, Tomasz, 2018. "Monitoring of thermal stresses in pressure components based on the wall temperature measurement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 500-519.
    4. Taler, Jan & Zima, Wiesław & Ocłoń, Paweł & Grądziel, Sławomir & Taler, Dawid & Cebula, Artur & Jaremkiewicz, Magdalena & Korzeń, Anna & Cisek, Piotr & Kaczmarski, Karol & Majewski, Karol, 2019. "Mathematical model of a supercritical power boiler for simulating rapid changes in boiler thermal loading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 580-592.
    5. Hermans, Mathias & Bruninx, Kenneth & Delarue, Erik, 2020. "Impact of generator start-up lead times on short-term scheduling with high shares of renewables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    6. Beiron, Johanna & Montañés, Rubén M. & Normann, Fredrik & Johnsson, Filip, 2020. "Flexible operation of a combined cycle cogeneration plant – A techno-economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    7. Jung Youn Mo & Wooyoung Jeon, 2017. "How Does Energy Storage Increase the Efficiency of an Electricity Market with Integrated Wind and Solar Power Generation?—A Case Study of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Angerer, Michael & Kahlert, Steffen & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2017. "Transient simulation and fatigue evaluation of fast gas turbine startups and shutdowns in a combined cycle plant with an innovative thermal buffer storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 246-257.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nyamdash, Batsaikhan & Denny, Eleanor, 2013. "The impact of electricity storage on wholesale electricity prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 6-16.
    2. Simoglou, Christos K. & Biskas, Pandelis N. & Vagropoulos, Stylianos I. & Bakirtzis, Anastasios G., 2014. "Electricity market models and RES integration: The Greek case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 531-542.
    3. Simoglou, Christos K. & Bakirtzis, Emmanouil A. & Biskas, Pandelis N. & Bakirtzis, Anastasios G., 2016. "Optimal operation of insular electricity grids under high RES penetration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1308-1316.
    4. Vithayasrichareon, Peerapat & MacGill, Iain F., 2014. "Incorporating short-term operational plant constraints into assessments of future electricity generation portfolios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 144-155.
    5. Wolf-Peter Schill & Michael Pahle & Christian Gambardella, 2016. "On Start-up Costs of Thermal Power Plants in Markets with Increasing Shares of Fluctuating Renewables," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1540, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Després, Jacques & Hadjsaid, Nouredine & Criqui, Patrick & Noirot, Isabelle, 2015. "Modelling the impacts of variable renewable sources on the power sector: Reconsidering the typology of energy modelling tools," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 486-495.
    7. Vithayasrichareon, Peerapat & MacGill, Iain F., 2013. "Assessing the value of wind generation in future carbon constrained electricity industries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 400-412.
    8. Osório, G.J. & Lujano-Rojas, J.M. & Matias, J.C.O. & Catalão, J.P.S., 2015. "A probabilistic approach to solve the economic dispatch problem with intermittent renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 949-959.
    9. Bingke Yan & Bo Wang & Lin Zhu & Hesen Liu & Yilu Liu & Xingpei Ji & Dichen Liu, 2015. "A Novel, Stable, and Economic Power Sharing Scheme for an Autonomous Microgrid in the Energy Internet," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-24, November.
    10. Lafond, François & Bailey, Aimee Gotway & Bakker, Jan David & Rebois, Dylan & Zadourian, Rubina & McSharry, Patrick & Farmer, J. Doyne, 2018. "How well do experience curves predict technological progress? A method for making distributional forecasts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 104-117.
    11. Curtis, John & Lynch, Muireann Á. & Zubiate, Laura, 2016. "The impact of the North Atlantic Oscillation on electricity markets: A case study on Ireland," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 186-198.
    12. Valeria Di Cosmo & Laura Malaguzzi Valeri, 2018. "How Much Does Wind Power Reduce $$\text {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 Emissions? Evidence from the Irish Single Electricity Market," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(3), pages 645-669, November.
    13. Katrin Trepper & Michael Bucksteeg & Christoph Weber, 2013. "An integrated approach to model redispatch and to assess potential benefits from market splitting in Germany," EWL Working Papers 1319, University of Duisburg-Essen, Chair for Management Science and Energy Economics, revised Apr 2014.
    14. Gokturk Poyrazoglu & HyungSeon Oh, 2019. "Co-optimization of Transmission Maintenance Scheduling and Production Cost Minimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Seán Diffney & Laura Malaguzzi Valeri & Darragh Walsh, 2012. "Should Coal Replace Coal? Options for the Irish Electricity Market," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 43(4), pages 561-596.
    16. Samadi, Sascha, 2018. "The experience curve theory and its application in the field of electricity generation technologies – A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2346-2364.
    17. Denny, Eleanor & O'Mahoney, Amy & Lannoye, Eamonn, 2017. "Modelling the impact of wind generation on electricity market prices in Ireland: An econometric versus unit commitment approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 109-119.
    18. Taler, Jan & Zima, Wiesław & Ocłoń, Paweł & Grądziel, Sławomir & Taler, Dawid & Cebula, Artur & Jaremkiewicz, Magdalena & Korzeń, Anna & Cisek, Piotr & Kaczmarski, Karol & Majewski, Karol, 2019. "Mathematical model of a supercritical power boiler for simulating rapid changes in boiler thermal loading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 580-592.
    19. Lamadrid, Alberto J. & Mount, Tim, 2012. "Ancillary services in systems with high penetrations of renewable energy sources, the case of ramping," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1959-1971.
    20. Lee, Shun-Chung & Shih, Li-Hsing, 2010. "Renewable energy policy evaluation using real option model -- The case of Taiwan," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(Supplemen), pages 67-78, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:113:y:2016:i:c:p:227-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.