IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v185y2024ics0301421523005190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional capabilities and hydrogen adoption barriers

Author

Listed:
  • Bolz, Susanna
  • Thiele, Julian
  • Wendler, Tobias

Abstract

Hydrogen is gaining importance to decarbonize the energy system and tackle the climate crisis. This exploratory study analyzes three focus groups with representatives from relevant organizations in a Northern German region that has unique beneficial characteristics for the transition to a hydrogen economy. Based upon this data, (1) a category system of innovation adoption barriers for hydrogen technologies is developed, (2) decision levels associated with the barriers are identified, (3) detailed insights on how decision levels contribute to the adoption barriers are provided and (4) the barriers are evaluated in terms of their importance. Our analysis adds to existing literature by focusing on short-term barriers and exploring relevant decision levels and their associated adoption barriers. Our main results comprise the following: flaws in the funding system, complex approval procedures, lack of networks and high costs contribute to hydrogen adoption barriers. The (Sub-)State level is relevant for the uptake of the hydrogen economy. Regional entities have leeway to foster the hydrogen transition, especially with respect to the distribution infrastructure. Funding policy, technological suitability, investment and operating costs, and the availability of distribution infrastructure and technical components are highly important adoption barriers that alone can impede the transition to a hydrogen economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Bolz, Susanna & Thiele, Julian & Wendler, Tobias, 2024. "Regional capabilities and hydrogen adoption barriers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0301421523005190
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421523005190
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113934?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enrique Acebo & José‐Ángel Miguel‐Dávila & Mariano Nieto, 2021. "External stakeholder engagement: Complementary and substitutive effects on firms' eco‐innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2671-2687, July.
    2. Todd D. Gerarden & Richard G. Newell & Robert N. Stavins, 2017. "Assessing the Energy-Efficiency Gap," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1486-1525, December.
    3. Laura Abrardi, 2019. "Behavioral barriers and the energy efficiency gap: a survey of the literature," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 46(1), pages 25-43, March.
    4. Zahler, Andrés & Goya, Daniel & Caamaño, Matías, 2022. "The primacy of demand and financial obstacles in hindering innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Frank, Alejandro Germán & Gerstlberger, Wolfgang & Paslauski, Carolline Amaral & Lerman, Laura Visintainer & Ayala, Néstor Fabián, 2018. "The contribution of innovation policy criteria to the development of local renewable energy systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 353-365.
    6. Nieves Arranz & Carlos F. Arroyabe & Juan Carlos Fernandez de Arroyabe, 2019. "The effect of regional factors in the development of eco‐innovations in the firm," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1406-1415, November.
    7. Grazia Cecere & Nicoletta Corrocher & Maria Luisa Mancusi, 2020. "Financial constraints and public funding of eco-innovation: empirical evidence from European SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 285-302, January.
    8. Sebastian Kobarg & Jutta Stumpf-Wollersheim & Christopher Schlägel & Isabell M. Welpe, 2020. "Green together? The effects of companies’ innovation collaboration with different partner types on ecological process and product innovation," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(9), pages 953-990, October.
    9. Schlund, David & Schulte, Simon & Sprenger, Tobias, 2022. "The who’s who of a hydrogen market ramp-up: A stakeholder analysis for Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Wu, Yunna & Liu, Fangtong & He, Jiaming & Wu, Man & Ke, Yiming, 2021. "Obstacle identification, analysis and solutions of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles for application in China under the carbon neutrality target," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    11. Marzucchi, Alberto & Montresor, Sandro, 2017. "Forms of knowledge and eco-innovation modes: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 208-221.
    12. Mäkitie, Tuukka & Steen, Markus & Saether, Erik Andreas & Bjørgum, Øyvind & Poulsen, René T., 2022. "Norwegian ship-owners' adoption of alternative fuels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Ajanovic, Amela & Haas, Reinhard, 2018. "Economic prospects and policy framework for hydrogen as fuel in the transport sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 280-288.
    14. Pfoser, Sarah & Schauer, Oliver & Costa, Yasel, 2018. "Acceptance of LNG as an alternative fuel: Determinants and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 259-267.
    15. Ping Huang & Zhen Yu, 2021. "Aligning industry interests with urban priorities to foster energy transitions: insights from two Chinese cities," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 14(2), pages 341-359.
    16. Korberg, A.D. & Brynolf, S. & Grahn, M. & Skov, I.R., 2021. "Techno-economic assessment of advanced fuels and propulsion systems in future fossil-free ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    17. Jens Horbach, 2014. "Do eco-innovations need specific regional characteristics? An econometric analysis for Germany," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 34(1), pages 23-38, February.
    18. Sanjay Kumar Kar & Akhoury Sudhir Kumar Sinha & Rohit Bansal & Bahman Shabani & Sidhartha Harichandan, 2023. "Overview of hydrogen economy in Australia," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), January.
    19. Mattes, Jannika & Huber, Andreas & Koehrsen, Jens, 2015. "Energy transitions in small-scale regions – What we can learn from a regional innovation systems perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 255-264.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enrique Acebo & José‐Ángel Miguel‐Dávila & Mariano Nieto, 2021. "External stakeholder engagement: Complementary and substitutive effects on firms' eco‐innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2671-2687, July.
    2. Hartmann, Julia & Inkpen, Andrew & Ramaswamy, Kannan, 2022. "An FsQCA exploration of multiple paths to ecological innovation adoption in European transportation," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    3. Bilgili, Levent, 2023. "A systematic review on the acceptance of alternative marine fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    4. Hansmeier Hendrik & Kroll Henning, 2024. "The geography of eco-innovations and sustainability transitions: A systematic comparison," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 68(2), pages 125-143.
    5. Sandro Montresor & Francesco Quatraro, 2020. "Green technologies and Smart Specialisation Strategies: a European patent-based analysis of the intertwining of technological relatedness and key enabling technologies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(10), pages 1354-1365, October.
    6. Ajanovic, Amela & Sayer, Marlene & Haas, Reinhard, 2024. "On the future relevance of green hydrogen in Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    7. Knuutila, Mirika & Vuorio, Anna, 2023. "Temporal-orientation in organizational decision-making: Factors affecting willingness to execute energy efficiency investments in business premises," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    8. Leonardo Becchetti & Sara Mancini & Nazaria Solferino, 2022. "The effects of domestic and EU incentives on corporate investment toward ecological transition: a propensity score matching approach [Large sample properties of matching estimators for average trea," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(6), pages 1517-1544.
    9. Li, Lingjia & Shan, Shuo & Dai, Jing & Che, Wen & Shou, Yongyi, 2022. "The impact of green supply chain management on green innovation: A meta-analysis from the inter-organizational learning perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    10. Long Li & Shuqi Wang & Shengxi Zhang & Ding Liu & Shengbin Ma, 2023. "The Hydrogen Energy Infrastructure Location Selection Model: A Hybrid Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Donis, Silvia & Gómez, Jaime & Salazar, Idana, 2023. "Economic complexity, property rights and the judicial system as drivers of eco-innovations: An analysis of OECD countries," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    12. Sebastian Losacker & Hendrik Hansmeier & Jens Horbach & Ingo Liefner, 2023. "The geography of environmental innovation: a critical review and agenda for future research," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 43(2), pages 291-316, August.
    13. Wang, Jiaxin & Liu, Jiemei & Wang, Jiawei & Huang, Xiang & Liu, Yu, 2023. "The puzzle of household wealth preservation and corporate innovation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    14. De Marchi, Valentina & Molina-Morales, F. Xavier & Martínez-Cháfer, Luis, 2022. "Environmental innovation and cooperation: A configurational approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    15. Rawat, Atul & Garg, Chandra Prakash & Sinha, Priyank, 2024. "Analysis of the key hydrogen fuel vehicles adoption barriers to reduce carbon emissions under net zero target in emerging market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    16. Teresa García‐Marco & Ferdaous Zouaghi & Mercedes Sánchez, 2020. "Do firms with different levels of environmental regulatory pressure behave differently regarding complementarity among innovation practices?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1684-1694, May.
    17. Parrilli, M. Davide & Balavac-Orlić, Merima & Radicic, Dragana, 2023. "Environmental innovation across SMEs in Europe," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    18. Kumar, Pranay & Caggiano, Holly & Shwom, Rachael & Felder, Frank A. & Andrews, Clinton J., 2023. "Saving from home! How income, efficiency, and curtailment behaviors shape energy consumption dynamics in US households?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    19. Wiegand, Julia, 2017. "Dezentrale Stromerzeugung als Chance zur Stärkung der Energie-Resilienz: Eine qualitative Analyse kommunaler Strategien im Raum Unna," Wuppertaler Studienarbeiten zur nachhaltigen Entwicklung, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, volume 11, number 11.
    20. Louis-Gaëtan Giraudet & Anna Petronevich & Laurent Faucheux, 2018. "How do lenders price energy efficiency? Evidence from posted interest rates for unsecured credit in France [Comment les créditeurs valorisent-ils l'efficacité énergétique? Une analyse des taux d'in," Working Papers hal-01890636, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0301421523005190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.