IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i8p10925-10941.html

Exploring Internal, Market and Institutional Dynamics That Drive Eco‐Innovation: Evidence From Portuguese Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigo Santos
  • Gonçalo Rodrigues Brás
  • Miguel Torres Preto

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of eco‐innovation adoption, drawing on data from 7083 firms in the 2014 Portuguese Community Innovation Survey. Although more recent waves of the survey reintroduced some questions related to environmental issues, the 2014 edition remains particularly valuable for its comprehensive coverage of eco‐innovation types and firm‐level characteristics relevant to this study. Using a hierarchical logistic regression, the analysis explores internal, market and institutional factors influencing eco‐innovation, including both intrafirm capabilities and end‐user–related dynamics. The results show that internal firm characteristics and market dynamics significantly influence eco‐innovation adoption, whereas institutional factors, such as subsidies and fiscal policies, exert comparatively limited effects. Moreover, the drivers of eco‐innovation within the firm align closely with those of overall eco‐innovation, underscoring the intrinsic nature of eco‐innovation processes. Nevertheless, challenges in leveraging end‐user consumption for eco‐innovation benefits highlight the need for targeted demand‐side interventions. These findings have critical implications for policymakers and businesses, advocating for revised policy frameworks and tailored strategies to foster eco‐innovation and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigo Santos & Gonçalo Rodrigues Brás & Miguel Torres Preto, 2025. "Exploring Internal, Market and Institutional Dynamics That Drive Eco‐Innovation: Evidence From Portuguese Companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10925-10941, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:8:p:10925-10941
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70149
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enrique Acebo & José‐Ángel Miguel‐Dávila & Mariano Nieto, 2021. "External stakeholder engagement: Complementary and substitutive effects on firms' eco‐innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2671-2687, July.
    2. Liu, Yijun & Xu, Rong, 2024. "Money talks: How financial constraint influence corporate environmental behavior prioritization," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 556-578.
    3. Dhekra Ben Amara & Hong Chen, 2022. "Driving factors for eco-innovation orientation: meeting sustainable growth in Tunisian agribusiness," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 713-732, June.
    4. Feng, Suling & Sui, Bo & Liu, Huimin & Li, Guoxiang, 2020. "Environmental decentralization and innovation in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 660-674.
    5. Chiappini, Raphaël & Montmartin, Benjamin & Pommet, Sophie & Demaria, Samira, 2022. "Can direct innovation subsidies relax SMEs’ financial constraints?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(5).
    6. Koen Bel & Dennis Fok & Richard Paap, 2018. "Parameter estimation in multivariate logit models with many binary choices," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(5), pages 534-550, May.
    7. Grazia Cecere & Nicoletta Corrocher & Maria Luisa Mancusi, 2020. "Financial constraints and public funding of eco-innovation: empirical evidence from European SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 285-302, January.
    8. De Marchi, Valentina, 2012. "Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 614-623.
    9. William D. Berry & Jacqueline H. R. DeMeritt & Justin Esarey, 2010. "Testing for Interaction in Binary Logit and Probit Models: Is a Product Term Essential?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 248-266, January.
    10. Marcus Wagner, 2005. "How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry," Post-Print hal-00279158, HAL.
    11. Stefano Brogi & Tamara Menichini, 2024. "The pathway towards circular economy: Measuring circular advantage of eco‐innovations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3005-3038, May.
    12. Li, Miaomiao & Cao, Guikun & Cui, Li & Liu, Xiaoquan & Dai, Jing, 2023. "Examining how government subsidies influence firms’ circular supply chain management: The role of eco-innovation and top management team," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    13. Tim Benijts, 2014. "A Business Sustainability Model for Government Corporations. A Belgian Case Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 204-216, March.
    14. Jeffrey D. Sachs & Guido Schmidt-Traub & Mariana Mazzucato & Dirk Messner & Nebojsa Nakicenovic & Johan Rockström, 2019. "Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(9), pages 805-814, September.
    15. Alexandra Kriz & Catherine Welch, 2018. "Innovation and internationalisation processes of firms with new-to-the-world technologies," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(4), pages 496-522, May.
    16. Selen CAKMAKYAPAN & Atilla GOKTAS, 2013. "A Comparison Of Binary Logit And Probit Models With A Simulation Study," Journal of Social and Economic Statistics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 2(1), pages 1-17, JULY.
    17. Shengzhong Zhang & Yingmin Yu & Qihong Zhu & Chun Martin Qiu & Aixuan Tian, 2020. "Green Innovation Mode under Carbon Tax and Innovation Subsidy: An Evolutionary Game Analysis for Portfolio Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Monica Singhania & Neha Saini, 2023. "Institutional framework of ESG disclosures: comparative analysis of developed and developing countries," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 516-559, January.
    19. Cheon Yu & Junghoon Park & Yun Seop Hwang, 2019. "How Do Anticipated and Self Regulations and Information Sourcing Openness Drive Firms to Implement Eco-Innovation? Evidence from Korean Manufacturing Firms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Horbach, Jens, 2008. "Determinants of environmental innovation--New evidence from German panel data sources," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 163-173, February.
    21. Rennings, Klaus & Ziegler, Andreas & Ankele, Kathrin & Hoffmann, Esther, 2006. "The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 45-59, April.
    22. Antonella Biscione & Raul Caruso & Annunziata de Felice, 2021. "Environmental innovation in European transition countries," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(5), pages 521-535, January.
    23. Rehfeld, Katharina-Maria & Rennings, Klaus & Ziegler, Andreas, 2007. "Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: An empirical analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 91-100, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Isabel Gallego‐Álvarez & José‐Luis Zafra‐Gómez, 2021. "Do independent, female and specialist directors promote eco‐innovation and eco‐design in agri‐food firms?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1136-1152, February.
    2. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    3. Brian Chi-ang Lin & Siqi Zheng & Nicolò Barbieri & Claudia Ghisetti & Marianna Gilli & Giovanni Marin & Francesco Nicolli, 2016. "A Survey Of The Literature On Environmental Innovation Based On Main Path Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 596-623, July.
    4. Sanni, Maruf, 2018. "Drivers of eco-innovation in the manufacturing sector of Nigeria," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 303-314.
    5. Tariq, Adeel & Badir, Yuosre F. & Tariq, Waqas & Bhutta, Umair Saeed, 2017. "Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 8-23.
    6. Pereira, Vijay & Nair, Asha KS. & Bhattacharyya, Som Sekhar, 2025. "Exploring and investigating the complementarity and multidimensionality of innovation for sustainability research: Past present and future," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    7. Alexandra Rese & Anke Kutschke & Daniel Baier, 2016. "Analyzing The Relative Influence Of Supply Side, Demand Side And Regulatory Factors On The Success Of Collaborative Energy Innovation Projects," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(02), pages 1-43, February.
    8. Nelyda Campos‐Requena & Diego Rivera & Francisco J. Fernández & Felipe Vásquez‐Lavin & Roberto D. Ponce Oliva, 2026. "Eco‐Innovation: Drivers and Obstacles for Agriculture Firms in a Developing Country," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 3247-3264, March.
    9. Eugenio Zubeltzu‐Jaka & Artitzar Erauskin‐Tolosa & Iñaki Heras‐Saizarbitoria, 2018. "Shedding light on the determinants of eco‐innovation: A meta‐analytic study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1093-1103, November.
    10. Pelin Demirel & Effie Kesidou, 2019. "Sustainability‐oriented capabilities for eco‐innovation: Meeting the regulatory, technology, and market demands," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 847-857, July.
    11. Jana Hojnik, 2017. "In Pursuit of Eco-innovation," UPP Monograph Series, University of Primorska Press, number 978-961-7023-53-4.
    12. Valero-Gil, Jesus & Surroca, Jordi A. & Tribo, Josep A. & Gutierrez, Leopoldo & Montiel, Ivan, 2023. "Innovation vs. standardization: The conjoint effects of eco-innovation and environmental management systems on environmental performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(4).
    13. Peiró-Signes, Ángel & Segarra-Oña, Marival & Trull-Domínguez, Óscar & Sánchez-Planelles, Joaquín, 2022. "Exposing the ideal combination of endogenous–exogenous drivers for companies’ ecoinnovative orientation: Results from machine-learning methods," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Pablo del Río & Cristina Peñasco & Desiderio Romero‐Jordán, 2015. "Distinctive Features of Environmental Innovators: An Econometric Analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 361-385, September.
    15. Jana Hojnik & Viktor Prokop & Jan Stejskal, 2022. "R&D as bridge to sustainable development? Case of Czech Republic and Slovenia," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 146-160, January.
    16. Giovanni Ferri & Marco Pini, 2019. "Environmental vs. Social Responsibility in the Firm. Evidence from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Ghisetti,Claudia & Marzucchi,Alberto & Montresor,Sandro, 2013. "Does external knowledge affect environmental innovations? An empirical investigation of eleven European countries," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201301, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), revised 23 May 2013.
    18. Adam Ryszko, 2016. "Proactive Environmental Strategy, Technological Eco-Innovation and Firm Performance—Case of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Pinget, Amandine, 2016. "Spécificités des déterminants des innovations environnementales : une approche appliquée aux PME [Specificities of determinants for environmental innovation : an approach applied to SMEs]," MPRA Paper 80108, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Ghisetti, Claudia & Marzucchi, Alberto & Montresor, Sandro, 2015. "The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 1080-1093.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:8:p:10925-10941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.