Author
Listed:
- Jettarat Janmontree
(Institute for Engineering of Products and Systems, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany)
- Aditya Shinde
(Institute for Engineering of Products and Systems, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany)
- Hartmut Zadek
(Institute for Engineering of Products and Systems, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany)
- Sebastian Trojahn
(Department of Economics, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences Bernburg, 06406 Bernburg, Germany)
- Kasin Ransikarbum
(Department of Industrial Engineering, Ubonratchathani University, Ubonratchathani 34190, Thailand)
Abstract
Effective management of the hydrogen supply chain (HSC), starting with supplier selection, is crucial for advancing the hydrogen industry and economy. Supplier selection, a complex Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) problem in an inherently uncertain environment, requires careful consideration. This study proposes a novel hybrid MCDA framework that integrates the Bayesian Best–Worst Method (BWM), Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Entropy Weight Method (EWM) for robust criteria weighting, which is aggregated using a game theory-based model to resolve inconsistencies and capture the complementary strengths of each technique. Next, the globally weighted criteria, emphasizing sustainability performance and techno-risk considerations, are used in the TODIM method grounded in prospect theory to rank hydrogen suppliers. Numerical experiments demonstrate the approach’s ability to enhance decision robustness compared to standalone MCDA methods. The comparative evaluation and sensitivity analysis confirm the stability and reliability of the proposed method, offering valuable insights for strategic supplier selection in the evolving hydrogen landscape in the HSC.
Suggested Citation
Jettarat Janmontree & Aditya Shinde & Hartmut Zadek & Sebastian Trojahn & Kasin Ransikarbum, 2025.
"A Strategic Hydrogen Supplier Assessment Using a Hybrid MCDA Framework with a Game Theory-Driven Criteria Analysis,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-27, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3508-:d:1693758
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3508-:d:1693758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.