IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i13p3508-d1693758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Strategic Hydrogen Supplier Assessment Using a Hybrid MCDA Framework with a Game Theory-Driven Criteria Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jettarat Janmontree

    (Institute for Engineering of Products and Systems, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Aditya Shinde

    (Institute for Engineering of Products and Systems, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Hartmut Zadek

    (Institute for Engineering of Products and Systems, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Sebastian Trojahn

    (Department of Economics, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences Bernburg, 06406 Bernburg, Germany)

  • Kasin Ransikarbum

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Ubonratchathani University, Ubonratchathani 34190, Thailand)

Abstract

Effective management of the hydrogen supply chain (HSC), starting with supplier selection, is crucial for advancing the hydrogen industry and economy. Supplier selection, a complex Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) problem in an inherently uncertain environment, requires careful consideration. This study proposes a novel hybrid MCDA framework that integrates the Bayesian Best–Worst Method (BWM), Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Entropy Weight Method (EWM) for robust criteria weighting, which is aggregated using a game theory-based model to resolve inconsistencies and capture the complementary strengths of each technique. Next, the globally weighted criteria, emphasizing sustainability performance and techno-risk considerations, are used in the TODIM method grounded in prospect theory to rank hydrogen suppliers. Numerical experiments demonstrate the approach’s ability to enhance decision robustness compared to standalone MCDA methods. The comparative evaluation and sensitivity analysis confirm the stability and reliability of the proposed method, offering valuable insights for strategic supplier selection in the evolving hydrogen landscape in the HSC.

Suggested Citation

  • Jettarat Janmontree & Aditya Shinde & Hartmut Zadek & Sebastian Trojahn & Kasin Ransikarbum, 2025. "A Strategic Hydrogen Supplier Assessment Using a Hybrid MCDA Framework with a Game Theory-Driven Criteria Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3508-:d:1693758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3508/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3508/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alipour, M. & Hafezi, R. & Rani, Pratibha & Hafezi, Mehdi & Mardani, Abbas, 2021. "A new Pythagorean fuzzy-based decision-making method through entropy measure for fuel cell and hydrogen components supplier selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Markus Reuß & Paris Dimos & Aline Léon & Thomas Grube & Martin Robinius & Detlef Stolten, 2021. "Hydrogen Road Transport Analysis in the Energy System: A Case Study for Germany through 2050," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Zongao Xie & Qihang Jin & Guanli Su & Wei Lu, 2024. "A Review of Hydrogen Storage and Transportation: Progresses and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-30, August.
    4. Kasin Ransikarbum & Hartmut Zadek & Jettarat Janmontree, 2024. "Evaluating Renewable Energy Sites in the Green Hydrogen Supply Chain with Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Thi-Ly Nguyen & Phi-Hung Nguyen & Hong-Anh Pham & Thi-Giang Nguyen & Duc-Thinh Nguyen & Thi-Hoai Tran & Hong-Cham Le & Huong-Thuy Phung, 2022. "A Novel Integrating Data Envelopment Analysis and Spherical Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Steel Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, June.
    6. Zhu, Shijie & Shi, Xilin & Yang, Chunhe & Bai, Weizheng & Wei, Xinxing & Yang, Kun & Li, Peng & Li, Hang & Li, Yinping & Wang, Guibin, 2024. "Site selection evaluation for salt cavern hydrogen storage in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    7. Llamazares, Bonifacio, 2018. "An analysis of the generalized TODIM method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 1041-1049.
    8. Busch, P. & Kendall, A. & Lipman, T., 2023. "A systematic review of life cycle greenhouse gas intensity values for hydrogen production pathways," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    9. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. Ehsan Shekarian & Behrang Ijadi & Amirreza Zare & Jukka Majava, 2022. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Industrial Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, June.
    11. Azadnia, Amir Hossein & McDaid, Conor & Andwari, Amin Mahmoudzadeh & Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan, 2023. "Green hydrogen supply chain risk analysis: A european hard-to-abate sectors perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. Ziyuan Xie & Guixian Tian & Yongchao Tao, 2022. "A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for Sustainable Supplier Selection in the Circular Economy and Industry 4.0 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Bolz, Susanna & Thiele, Julian & Wendler, Tobias, 2024. "Regional capabilities and hydrogen adoption barriers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    14. Sarkis, Joseph & Dhavale, Dileep G., 2015. "Supplier selection for sustainable operations: A triple-bottom-line approach using a Bayesian framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 177-191.
    15. Yu Han & Woon Kian Chong & Dong Li, 2020. "A systematic literature review of the capabilities and performance metrics of supply chain resilience," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(15), pages 4541-4566, July.
    16. Edward I. Altman, 1968. "Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis And The Prediction Of Corporate Bankruptcy," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 589-609, September.
    17. Xuan, Ang & Sun, Yingfei & Liu, Zhengguang & Zheng, Peijun & Peng, Weike, 2025. "An ADMM-based tripartite distributed planning approach in integrated electricity and natural gas system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
    18. Gregory Trencher & Achmed Edianto, 2021. "Drivers and Barriers to the Adoption of Fuel Cell Passenger Vehicles and Buses in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, February.
    19. Hashemi, Seyed Hamid & Karimi, Amir & Tavana, Madjid, 2015. "An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 178-191.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matteo Genovese & David Blekhman & Michael Dray & Francesco Piraino & Petronilla Fragiacomo, 2023. "Experimental Comparison of Hydrogen Refueling with Directly Pressurized vs. Cascade Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Ruggero Angelico & Ferruccio Giametta & Biagio Bianchi & Pasquale Catalano, 2025. "Green Hydrogen for Energy Transition: A Critical Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-47, January.
    3. Janmontree, Jettarat & Zadek, Hartmut & Ransikarbum, Kasin, 2025. "Analyzing solar location for green hydrogen using multi-criteria decision analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    4. Ananna Paul & Nagesh Shukla & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Andrea Trianni, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Over Manuel Montes Causil & Danielle Costa Morais, 2023. "Food supplier sorting model for strategic supply chain sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4103-4118, November.
    6. Alipour, M. & Hafezi, R. & Rani, Pratibha & Hafezi, Mehdi & Mardani, Abbas, 2021. "A new Pythagorean fuzzy-based decision-making method through entropy measure for fuel cell and hydrogen components supplier selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    7. Li, He & Jiang, Dengying & Fang, Debin & Xing, Zeyu, 2025. "A MAGDM method based on signed distance and improved HTFWA operator for green electricity retailer selection," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    8. Davis-Sramek, Beth & Robinson, Jessica L. & Darby, Jessica L. & Thomas, Rodney W., 2020. "Exploring the differential roles of environmental and social sustainability in carrier selection decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    9. Zhu, Qingyun & Shah, Purvi & Sarkis, Joseph, 2018. "Addition by subtraction: Integrating product deletion with lean and sustainable supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 201-214.
    10. Jie Lu & Feng Li & Desheng Wu, 2024. "A Two-Stage Sustainable Supplier Selection Model Considering Disruption Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Ke-Qin Wang & Hu-Chen Liu & Liping Liu & Jia Huang, 2017. "Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection Using Cloud Model Theory and the QUALIFLEX Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Xiongyong Zhou & Zhiduan Xu, 2018. "An Integrated Sustainable Supplier Selection Approach Based on Hybrid Information Aggregation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-49, July.
    13. Fuli Zhou & Yun Lin & Xu Wang & Lin Zhou & Yandong He, 2016. "ELV Recycling Service Provider Selection Using the Hybrid MCDM Method: A Case Application in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Kannan Govindan & Aditi & Arshia Kaul & Jyoti Dhingra Darbari & P. C. Jha, 2023. "Analysis of supplier evaluation and selection strategies for sustainable collaboration: A combined approach of best–worst method and TOmada de Decisao Interativa Multicriterio," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4426-4447, November.
    15. Shaikh, Ibrahim A. & O'Brien, Jonathan Paul & Peters, Lois, 2018. "Inside directors and the underinvestment of financial slack towards R&D-intensity in high-technology firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 192-201.
    16. Mikel Bedayo & Raquel Vegas & Gabriel Jiménez & José-Luis Peydró, 2020. "Screening and Loan Origination Time: Lending Standards, Loan Defaults and Bank Failures," Working Papers 1215, Barcelona School of Economics.
    17. Ruey-Ching Hwang, 2013. "Forecasting credit ratings with the varying-coefficient model," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(12), pages 1947-1965, December.
    18. Giordani, Paolo & Jacobson, Tor & Schedvin, Erik von & Villani, Mattias, 2014. "Taking the Twists into Account: Predicting Firm Bankruptcy Risk with Splines of Financial Ratios," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 1071-1099, August.
    19. Li, Chunyu & Lou, Chenxin & Luo, Dan & Xing, Kai, 2021. "Chinese corporate distress prediction using LASSO: The role of earnings management," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    20. Suzan Hol, 2006. "The influence of the business cycle on bankruptcy probability," Discussion Papers 466, Statistics Norway, Research Department.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3508-:d:1693758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.