IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v147y2025ics0140988325003858.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Talk or walk? Evidence from 59 countries on the impact of the net-zero target on low-carbon technology innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Yan, Jin
  • Liu, Lancui
  • Gao, Xue
  • Yan, Haoben
  • Kuang, Shiyi

Abstract

Low-carbon technology (LCT) innovation is critical for global low-carbon transformation. To explore the progress and trends of LCT innovation across countries, we examine the impact of the net-zero target on LCT innovation based on based on the latest global data (i.e. panel data from 59 countries for 2013–2021, patent data for 2014–2022 and climate mitigation policy data for 2014–2022). Applying a multi-period difference-in-differences (DiD) model, this study finds that the net-zero target has significantly promoted LCT innovation, primarily through strengthened climate policies and corporate response mechanisms. The impact is stronger in countries with higher levels of public awareness of climate change and higher carbon emissions. Innovation in zero-carbon technology and carbon capture and storage (CCS)-type carbon-reduction technology has been significantly promoted by the net-zero target announcement, while negative-carbon technology and efficiency-enhancing carbon-reduction technology have not been significantly affected; innovation in supply-side LCT has been promoted, while demand-side LCT has not experienced significant effects. Moreover, the net-zero target does not have a significant effect on climate change adaptation technology innovation. This study suggests that governments should leverage the positive impact of net-zero targets on zero-carbon and CCS-based carbon-reduction technologies, as well as on supply-side LCT innovations, to further incentivize the scaling up of these technologies. Simultaneously, governments should increase incentives for negative-carbon technologies and demand-side LCT innovation. Additionally, to enhance LCT innovation, countries should raise public awareness of climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan, Jin & Liu, Lancui & Gao, Xue & Yan, Haoben & Kuang, Shiyi, 2025. "Talk or walk? Evidence from 59 countries on the impact of the net-zero target on low-carbon technology innovation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:147:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325003858
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325003858
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108561?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:147:y:2025:i:c:s0140988325003858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.