IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v134y2024ics0140988324002780.html

From policy stringency to environmental resilience: Unraveling the dose-response dynamics of environmental parameters in OECD countries

Author

Listed:
  • Sohag, Kazi
  • Islam, Md. Monirul
  • Hammoudeh, Shawkat

Abstract

In the pursuit of sustainable development and the mitigation of negative externalities arising from environmental stressors, a multitude of member countries within the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have embraced various environmental policies. Nevertheless, previous empirical research has largely overlooked investigating the causal relationship between the Environmental Policy Stringency (EPS) and environmental indicators. To bridge this gap, we conduct an empirical study to examine the dose-response relationship between EPS, as a continuous treatment variable, and selected environmental indicators. Our findings reveal evidence of a mixed treatment effect of policy stringency on the environment. Notably, the implementation of EPS leads to a reduction in carbon emissions per capita and an overall decline in ecological footprint. However, despite OECD countries moving towards a negative trajectory to preserve the environment, carbon intensity remains steadfastly on a positive path. Moreover, the intensification of policy stringency demonstrates positive effects on total renewable energy production, encompassing solar, wind, and eco-innovation. Building upon these empirical results, we offer several policy implications for the adoption and implementation of environmental policies within OECD countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Sohag, Kazi & Islam, Md. Monirul & Hammoudeh, Shawkat, 2024. "From policy stringency to environmental resilience: Unraveling the dose-response dynamics of environmental parameters in OECD countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:134:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324002780
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324002780
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107570?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alsagr, Naif, 2023. "How environmental policy stringency affects renewable energy investment? Implications for green investment horizons," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Tobias Kruse & Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Rudy Saffar & Leo Robert, 2022. "Measuring environmental policy stringency in OECD countries: An update of the OECD composite EPS indicator," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1703, OECD Publishing.
    3. Sarah L. Stattman & Aarti Gupta & Lena Partzsch & Peter Oosterveer, 2018. "Toward Sustainable Biofuels in the European Union? Lessons from a Decade of Hybrid Biofuel Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Marrero, Madelyn & Puerto, Manuel & Rivero-Camacho, Cristina & Freire-Guerrero, Antonio & Solís-Guzmán, Jaime, 2017. "Assessing the economic impact and ecological footprint of construction and demolition waste during the urbanization of rural land," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 160-174.
    5. Li, Zeyun & Kuo, Yen-Ku & Mahmud, Abdul Rahman & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Haffar, Mohamed & Muda, Iskandar, 2022. "Integration of renewable energy, environmental policy stringency, and climate technologies in realizing environmental sustainability: Evidence from OECD countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1376-1384.
    6. Xu, Le & Yang, Lili & Li, Ding & Shao, Shuai, 2023. "Asymmetric effects of heterogeneous environmental standards on green technology innovation: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    7. Nick Johnstone & Ivan Haščič & Julie Poirier & Marion Hemar & Christian Michel, 2012. "Environmental policy stringency and technological innovation: evidence from survey data and patent counts," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(17), pages 2157-2170, June.
    8. Signe M. Jensen & Felix M. Kluxen & Christian Ritz, 2019. "A Review of Recent Advances in Benchmark Dose Methodology," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(10), pages 2295-2315, October.
    9. Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Misato Sato, 2017. "The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(2), pages 183-206.
    10. Sen, Souvik & Ganguly, Sourav, 2017. "Opportunities, barriers and issues with renewable energy development – A discussion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1170-1181.
    11. Onno Kuik & Reyer Gerlagh, 2003. "Trade Liberalization and Carbon Leakage," The Energy Journal, , vol. 24(3), pages 97-120, July.
    12. Galeotti, Marzio & Salini, Silvia & Verdolini, Elena, 2020. "Measuring environmental policy stringency: Approaches, validity, and impact on environmental innovation and energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    13. Böhringer, Christoph & Rosendahl, Knut Einar & Storrøsten, Halvor Briseid, 2017. "Robust policies to mitigate carbon leakage," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 35-46.
    14. Notton, Gilles & Nivet, Marie-Laure & Voyant, Cyril & Paoli, Christophe & Darras, Christophe & Motte, Fabrice & Fouilloy, Alexis, 2018. "Intermittent and stochastic character of renewable energy sources: Consequences, cost of intermittence and benefit of forecasting," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 96-105.
    15. Roberta Arbolino & Luisa De Simone, 2019. "Rethinking public and private policies in Europe with the support of a industrial sustainability index," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 315-339, June.
    16. Charnovitz, Steve & Fischer, Carolyn, 2015. "Canada–Renewable Energy: Implications for WTO Law on Green and Not-So-Green Subsidies," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 177-210, April.
    17. Mahmoud Hassan & Damien Rousselière, 2022. "Does increasing environmental policy stringency lead to accelerated environmental innovation? A research note," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(17), pages 1989-1998, April.
    18. Wang, Zhuo & Yen-Ku, Kuo & Li, Zeyun & An, Nguyen Binh & Abdul-Samad, Zulkiflee, 2022. "The transition of renewable energy and ecological sustainability through environmental policy stringency: Estimations from advance panel estimators," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 70-80.
    19. Julia Hartmann & Andrew C Inkpen & Kannan Ramaswamy, 2021. "Different shades of green: Global oil and gas companies and renewable energy," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(5), pages 879-903, July.
    20. Forest Reinhardt, 1999. "Market Failure and the Environmental Policies of Firms: Economic Rationales for “Beyond Compliance” Behavior," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 3(1), pages 9-21, January.
    21. Frey, Gary W. & Linke, Deborah M., 2002. "Hydropower as a renewable and sustainable energy resource meeting global energy challenges in a reasonable way," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(14), pages 1261-1265, November.
    22. Kannan, Nadarajah & Vakeesan, Divagar, 2016. "Solar energy for future world: - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1092-1105.
    23. Enrico Botta & Tomasz Koźluk, 2014. "Measuring Environmental Policy Stringency in OECD Countries: A Composite Index Approach," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1177, OECD Publishing.
    24. repec:aen:journl:2003v24-03-a04 is not listed on IDEAS
    25. Sun, Yunpeng & Guan, Weimin & Razzaq, Asif & Shahzad, Mohsin & Binh An, Nguyen, 2022. "Transition towards ecological sustainability through fiscal decentralization, renewable energy and green investment in OECD countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 385-395.
    26. Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh, 2017. "A third option for climate policy within potential limits to growth," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(2), pages 107-112, February.
    27. Li, Sheng & Samour, Ahmed & Irfan, Muhammad & Ali, Madad, 2023. "Role of renewable energy and fiscal policy on trade adjusted carbon emissions: Evaluating the role of environmental policy stringency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 156-165.
    28. Wang, Yun & Sun, Xiaohua & Guo, Xu, 2019. "Environmental regulation and green productivity growth: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from OECD industrial sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 611-619.
    29. Stokes, Leah C., 2013. "The politics of renewable energy policies: The case of feed-in tariffs in Ontario, Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 490-500.
    30. Humberto Brea-Solis & Sergio Perelman & David Saal, 2017. "Regulatory incentives to water losses reduction: the case of England and Wales," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 259-276, June.
    31. Zhang, Xiao & Li, Hong-Yi & Deng, Zhiqun Daniel & Ringler, Claudia & Gao, Yang & Hejazi, Mohamad I. & Leung, L. Ruby, 2018. "Impacts of climate change, policy and Water-Energy-Food nexus on hydropower development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 827-834.
    32. Thai-Ha Le & Youngho Chang & Donghyun Park, 2020. "Renewable and Nonrenewable Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Emissions: International Evidence," The Energy Journal, , vol. 41(2), pages 73-92, March.
    33. Fabrizio Fusillo & Francesco Quatraro & Stefano Usai, 2022. "Going green: the dynamics of green technological alliances," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 362-386, July.
    34. Liao, Jixiang & Liu, Xingye & Zhou, Xueyan & Tursunova, Nargiza Rakhimovna, 2023. "Analyzing the role of renewable energy transition and industrialization on ecological sustainability: Can green innovation matter in OECD countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 141-151.
    35. Evan K. Rose & Yotam Shem-Tov, 2021. "How Does Incarceration Affect Reoffending? Estimating the Dose-Response Function," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(12), pages 3302-3356.
    36. Rahman, Abidur & Farrok, Omar & Haque, Md Mejbaul, 2022. "Environmental impact of renewable energy source based electrical power plants: Solar, wind, hydroelectric, biomass, geothermal, tidal, ocean, and osmotic," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    37. Rogers, J.C. & Simmons, E.A. & Convery, I. & Weatherall, A., 2008. "Public perceptions of opportunities for community-based renewable energy projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 4217-4226, November.
    38. Frederik Dahlmann & Layla Branicki & Stephen Brammer, 2019. "Managing Carbon Aspirations: The Influence of Corporate Climate Change Targets on Environmental Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 1-24, August.
    39. Cole, Matthew A., 2004. "Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 71-81, January.
    40. Moez Krichen & Yasir Basheer & Saeed Mian Qaisar & Asad Waqar, 2023. "A Survey on Energy Storage: Techniques and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-29, February.
    41. Long, Yin & Yoshida, Yoshikuni & Zhang, Runsen & Sun, Lu & Dou, Yi, 2018. "Policy implications from revealing consumption-based carbon footprint of major economic sectors in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 339-348.
    42. Stephen Hammer & Lamia Kamal-Chaoui & Alexis Robert & Marissa Plouin, 2011. "Cities and Green Growth: A Conceptual Framework," OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2011/8, OECD Publishing.
    43. Herman, Kyle S. & Xiang, Jun, 2019. "Induced innovation in clean energy technologies from foreign environmental policy stringency?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 198-207.
    44. Claire Brunel & Arik Levinson, 2016. "Measuring the Stringency of Environmental Regulations," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10(1), pages 47-67.
    45. repec:aen:journl:ej41-2-chang is not listed on IDEAS
    46. Sinha, Avik & Bekiros, Stelios & Hussain, Nazim & Nguyen, Duc Khuong & Khan, Sana Akbar, 2023. "How social imbalance and governance quality shape policy directives for energy transition in the OECD countries?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    47. Lawrence H. Goulder & Ian W. H. Parry, 2008. "Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 2(2), pages 152-174, Summer.
    48. Feng, Yanchao & Zhang, Juan & Geng, Yong & Jin, Shurui & Zhu, Ziyi & Liang, Zhou, 2023. "Explaining and modeling the reduction effect of low-carbon energy transition on energy intensity: Empirical evidence from global data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    49. Daron Acemoglu & Philippe Aghion & Leonardo Bursztyn & David Hemous, 2012. "The Environment and Directed Technical Change," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 131-166, February.
    50. Jiang, Jingjing & Ye, Bin & Liu, Junguo, 2019. "Peak of CO2 emissions in various sectors and provinces of China: Recent progress and avenues for further research," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 813-833.
    51. Afshan, Sahar & Ozturk, Ilhan & Yaqoob, Tanzeela, 2022. "Facilitating renewable energy transition, ecological innovations and stringent environmental policies to improve ecological sustainability: Evidence from MM-QR method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 151-160.
    52. Elum, Z.A. & Momodu, A.S., 2017. "Climate change mitigation and renewable energy for sustainable development in Nigeria: A discourse approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 72-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huri Gül Aybudak & Waqar Khalid & Muhammad Usman & Mehdi Seraj & Abdul Rafay & Qazi Shahzad Ali, 2025. "Assessing the impacts of economic growth, stringent environmental policies, renewable energy, and non-renewable energy on environmental sustainability in G-7 economies: Insights from the Method of Moments Quantile Regression," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 743-772, September.
    2. Otrachshenko, Vladimir & Popova, Olga, 2026. "Environment vs. economic growth: Do environmental preferences translate into support for Green parties?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Bettarelli, Luca & Furceri, Davide & Pizzuto, Pietro & Shakoor, Nadia, 2025. "Do climate policies affect green patenting patterns?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Sohag, Kazi & Husain, Shaiara & Soytas, Ugur, 2024. "Environmental policy stringency and ecological footprint linkage: Mitigation measures of renewable energy and innovation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    5. Tao, Miaomiao & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Poletti, Stephen & Roubaud, David & Silva, Emilson, 2025. "The credibility of environmental policy stringency: Implications for sustainability in OECD Countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    6. Horn, Matthias & Dabbous, Amal & Oehler, Andreas & Göbel, Florian, 2026. "Determinants and effects of green bond issuance: Environmental awareness, ecological budget, biodiversity, oil and lithium," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    7. Islam, Md. Monirul & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Sohag, Kazi, 2025. "Financial innovation and clean energy technology development: Policy vs. geopolitics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    8. Dabbous, Amal & Croutzet, Alexandre & Horn, Matthias, 2025. "Achieving energy resilience: The joint role of environmental policy stringency and environmental awareness," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Xia, Chunxun & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel & Raza Syed, Qasim, 2025. "Electricity generation from renewable and non-renewable energy sources in China: The role of environmental policy stringency, FDI, and economic growth," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    10. MotazBellah Abdalmuiz Alatrash & Murad Abdurahman Bein & Ahmed Samour, 2025. "The Impact of World Uncertainty, Environmental Policy Stringency, and Technological Innovation on Environmental Sustainability: Evidence from High-Income Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tao, Miaomiao & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Poletti, Stephen & Roubaud, David & Silva, Emilson, 2025. "The credibility of environmental policy stringency: Implications for sustainability in OECD Countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Langinier, Corinne & Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada & RayChaudhuri, Amrita, 2025. "Environmental regulations and green innovation: The role of trade and technology transfer," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    3. Dabbous, Amal & Aoun Barakat, Karine & Ben Arfi, Wissal & Nammouri, Hela, 2025. "The impact of environmental policy stringency and economic complexity on nations' energy transitions: The mediating role of fintech financing," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    4. Dabbous, Amal & Croutzet, Alexandre & Horn, Matthias, 2025. "Achieving energy resilience: The joint role of environmental policy stringency and environmental awareness," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    5. Zhang, Dan & Zheng, Mingbo & Feng, Gen-Fu & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2022. "Does an environmental policy bring to green innovation in renewable energy?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1113-1124.
    6. Ullah, Sami & Luo, Rundong & Nadeem, Muhammad & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier, 2023. "Advancing sustainable growth and energy transition in the United States through the lens of green energy innovations, natural resources and environmental policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    7. Rik Rozendaal & Herman Vollebergh, 2025. "Policy-Induced Innovation in Clean Technologies: Evidence from the Car Market," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 12(3), pages 565-598.
    8. Benatti, Nicola & Groiss, Martin & Kelly, Petra & Lopez-Garcia, Paloma, 2024. "The impact of environmental regulation on clean innovation: are there crowding out effects?," Working Paper Series 2946, European Central Bank.
    9. Husain, Shaiara & Sohag, Kazi & Wu, Yanrui, 2024. "Proven reserve oil and renewable energy nexus: Efficacy of policy stringency," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    10. Li, Hongmei & Xu, Ruizhe, 2023. "Impact of fiscal policies and natural resources on ecological sustainability of BRICS region: Moderating role of green innovation and ecological governance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    11. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Chih-Wei & Lin, Weizheng & Lee, Fang-Yi, 2025. "Environmental tightening, labor slackening: Unveiling the inefficiencies in labor investment," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    12. Bettarelli, Luca & Furceri, Davide & Pizzuto, Pietro & Shakoor, Nadia, 2025. "Do climate policies affect green patenting patterns?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    13. Usman, Ahmed & Ullah, Sana & Ozturk, Ilhan & Sohail, Sidra & Sohail, Muhammad Tayyab, 2024. "Does environmental policy stringency reduce trade in energy resources? Insights from coal, petroleum, and gas," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    14. Sohag, Kazi & Husain, Shaiara & Soytas, Ugur, 2024. "Environmental policy stringency and ecological footprint linkage: Mitigation measures of renewable energy and innovation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    15. Zhang, Guoxing & Gao, Yang & Su, Bin & Chen, Zhanglei & Zhang, Yi, 2025. "Inconsistent effects of heterogeneous environmental policy on corporate green innovation: Evidence from China's companies and policy quantification," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 315-342.
    16. Pang, Ruizhi & Zhang, Xuping & Leisten, Matthew & Deng, Zhongqi, 2025. "The equilibrium effects of environmental regulation on heterogeneous competing firms: Theory and evidence from Chinese manufacturing," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    17. Sheraz, Muhammad & Qin, Quande & Mumtaz, Muhammad Zubair, 2024. "Energy transition in OECD countries: Catalyzing governance quality for SDG 7 attainment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    18. Nketiah, Emmanuel & Song, Huaming & Adjei, Mavis & Obuobi, Bright & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson, 2024. "Assessing the influence of research and development, environmental policies, and green technology on ecological footprint for achieving environmental sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    19. Quintás, María A. & Martínez-Senra, Ana I. & Otero-Giráldez, M.S., 2024. "Non-Linear effects of diesel taxes on environmental innovation: Room for higher taxes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    20. Guller Sahin & Halil Ibrahim Aydin & Adnan Ozdemir, 2025. "The Relationship Between Energy and Climate Action in the Context of Sustainable Development Goals: An Empirical Analysis of BRICS–T Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-18, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:134:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324002780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.