Mendelian randomization in health research: Using appropriate genetic variants and avoiding biased estimates
Mendelian randomization methods, which use genetic variants as instrumental variables for exposures of interest to overcome problems of confounding and reverse causality, are becoming widespread for assessing causal relationships in epidemiological studies. The main purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how results can be biased if researchers select genetic variants on the basis of their association with the exposure in their own dataset, as often happens in candidate gene analyses. This can lead to estimates that indicate apparent “causal” relationships, despite there being no true effect of the exposure. In addition, we discuss the potential bias in estimates of magnitudes of effect from Mendelian randomization analyses when the measured exposure is a poor proxy for the true underlying exposure. We illustrate these points with specific reference to tobacco research.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Carslake, David & Fraser, Abigail & Davey Smith, George & May, Margaret & Palmer, Tom & Sterne, Jonathan & Silventoinen, Karri & Tynelius, Per & Lawlor, Debbie A. & Rasmussen, Finn, 2013. "Associations of mortality with own height using son's height as an instrumental variable," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 351-359.
- Paul S. Clarke & Frank Windmeijer, 2012.
"Instrumental Variable Estimators for Binary Outcomes,"
Journal of the American Statistical Association,
Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(500), pages 1638-1652, December.
- Paul Clarke & Frank Windmeijer, 2009. "Instrumental Variable Estimators for Binary Outcomes," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 09/209, Department of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
- Paul Clarke & Frank Windmeijer, 2010. "Instrumental Variable Estimators for Binary Outcomes," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 10/239, Department of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
- Fletcher, Jason M. & Lehrer, Steven F., 2011. "Genetic lotteries within families," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 647-659, July.
- Stock, James H & Wright, Jonathan H & Yogo, Motohiro, 2002. "A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(4), pages 518-529, October.
- Wehby, George L. & Murray, Jeffrey C. & Wilcox, Allen & Lie, Rolv T., 2012. "Smoking and body weight: Evidence using genetic instruments," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 113-126. Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)