Author
Listed:
- Qiu, Li
- Feng, Wenhan
- Huang, Lianzhen
- Zhu, Cheng
- Nie, Xin
Abstract
Understanding environmental protection behaviour in social–ecological systems requires models that represent not only economic incentives but also individuals’ cognitive processes related to ecological risk, future benefits, and social influence. However, many agent-based models still simplify human decision-making as static preferences or cost–benefit calculations, leaving cognitive mechanisms such as psychological distance insufficiently represented. To address this gap, we propose ABMIND, the Agent-Based Model of Individual Psychological Distance, an empirically informed agent-based model that formalises psychological distance as a dynamic state variable linking uncertainty, social interaction, ecological feedback, and environmental behaviour. Using household survey data from coastal farming communities in Guangxi, China, we initialised heterogeneous farmer agents, parameterised behavioural mechanisms, and provided empirical support for key cognitive pathways. We applied ABMIND to simulate mangrove conservation outcomes under eight policy scenarios, including rewards, penalties, publicity guidance, and their combinations. The results show that, within the current model setting, reward-based intervention most effectively shortens temporal distance and improves ecological outcomes; publicity guidance primarily reduces social distance and promotes protection behaviour; and policy mixes do not necessarily produce synergistic effects, as higher levels of protection behaviour do not always lead to better ecological recovery. ABMIND provides a transferable modelling framework for embedding cognitive–behavioural mechanisms into agent-based environmental models and for evaluating policy interventions in complex social–ecological systems.
Suggested Citation
Qiu, Li & Feng, Wenhan & Huang, Lianzhen & Zhu, Cheng & Nie, Xin, 2026.
"ABMIND: An empirically informed agent-based model of psychological distance and environmental protection behaviour,"
Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 520(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:520:y:2026:i:c:s0304380026002280
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2026.111700
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:520:y:2026:i:c:s0304380026002280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.