IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v86y2025icp794-811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land use tournaments and urban green total factor productivity: Evidence from the reform in China

Author

Listed:
  • Sun, Hongliang
  • Chen, Jie
  • Wu, Yanbo
  • Wu, Youmeng

Abstract

Previous studies have highlighted the adverse impact of land misallocation on economic development, but few have explored how such mismatches can be alleviated. The main purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of the "Heroes Ranked by Per Mu Yield" reform (HPR)—an innovative governance model for land-use tournaments led by the local governments in China—on urban green total factor productivity (UGTFP). Using data from 41 cities in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region from 2003 to 2020, we employ staggered difference-in-differences (SDID) and difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) models to empirically assess the policy's effects and heterogeneity. Our findings show that the HPR significantly enhances UGTFP, especially in cities with weaker technological foundations, lower openness, and stronger government economic intervention. Additionally, the effect of the HPR is moderated by urban industrial structure and government competitiveness. Analysis of political texts reveals that the intensity of implementation and assessment also influences the reform's effectiveness. This study provides theoretical explanations and empirical evidence for optimizing the allocation of land resources, as well as policy recommendations for promoting green, high-quality urban development in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Sun, Hongliang & Chen, Jie & Wu, Yanbo & Wu, Youmeng, 2025. "Land use tournaments and urban green total factor productivity: Evidence from the reform in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 794-811.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:86:y:2025:i:c:p:794-811
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.04.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625001328
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.04.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:86:y:2025:i:c:p:794-811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.