IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v105y2021ics0264837721001137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study the effect of industrial structure optimization on urban land-use efficiency in China

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Jingming
  • Hou, Xianhui
  • Wang, Zhanqi
  • Shen, Yue

Abstract

Optimizing industrial structure plays an important role in changing urban land use structure and redistributing land resources among various industrial sectors, further impacting urban land-use efficiency (ULUE) and ensuring sustainable development of local industries. In this paper, we adopted the panel data of 31 provinces in China from 2000 to 2015 as case studies, and included spatially lagged dependent variable, spatially lagged exogenous variables and quadratic terms by combining the STIRPAT model with the spatial Dubin Model (SDM) together to reflect the time-lagged effects, pace-based correlation, and embedded complex nonlinearity relationship between industrial structure optimization (ISO) and ULUE separately. Leveraging such design, we first accessed the value of ULUE and ISO separately by provinces, and found interesting patterns in time and space. Temporally, the value of industrial structure upgrading (ISU) and ULUE increased gradually during 2000–2015, while the value of industrial structure rationalization (ISR) first decreased and then increased over that period. Spatially, ISU showed a strong geographical aggregation than ISR, the distribution of ULUE showed a “T” pattern from eastern to west in 2015. Then, we analyzed the effect of ISO on ULUE from three aspects, urban land structure efficiency, scale efficiency and intensive efficiency separately. Results show that the relationship between ULUE and ISO delineated as “U-shaped curve”. Among these, ISU has the greatest impact on land structural efficiency, followed by intensive efficiency, while ISR showed a U-shape distribution between structure efficiency and scale efficiency, but a reciprocal U-shape with the intensive efficiency. Moreover, the value of ULUE was affected by its pervious value, and the spillover effect of ISU stimulated the growth of local ULUE, but the ISR in the near province hindered the improvement of local ULUE. For the long-term development, it is necessary for the local government to make full use of their competitive advantages to attract more high-tech and low-consumption industries, and encourage a diversified industrial chain to speed up the agglomeration of factors in production. And it is also important to establish the coordination and interaction mechanism between west and east regions to achieve the dual objectives for ISO and ULUE promotion in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Jingming & Hou, Xianhui & Wang, Zhanqi & Shen, Yue, 2021. "Study the effect of industrial structure optimization on urban land-use efficiency in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:105:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721001137
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721001137
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105390?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liddle, Brantley, 2013. "Urban density and climate change: a STIRPAT analysis using city-level data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 22-29.
    2. Ibeas, Ángel & Cordera, Ruben & dell’Olio, Luigi & Coppola, Pierluigi & Dominguez, Alberto, 2012. "Modelling transport and real-estate values interactions in urban systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 370-382.
    3. Edward L. Glaeser & Glenn Ellison, 1999. "The Geographic Concentration of Industry: Does Natural Advantage Explain Agglomeration?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(2), pages 311-316, May.
    4. Xianhui Hou & Jingming Liu & Daojun Zhang, 2019. "Regional sustainable development: The relationship between natural capital utilization and economic development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 183-195, January.
    5. Hu, Fei & Zhao, Shangmei & Bing, Tao & Chang, Yiming, 2017. "Hierarchy in industrial structure: The cases of China and the USA," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 469(C), pages 871-882.
    6. Combes, Pierre-Philippe, 2000. "Economic Structure and Local Growth: France, 1984-1993," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 329-355, May.
    7. Wang, Chao & Zhang, Xinyi & Vilela, André L.M. & Liu, Chao & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2019. "Industrial structure upgrading and the impact of the capital market from 1998 to 2015: A spatial econometric analysis in Chinese regions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 513(C), pages 189-201.
    8. Rappaport, Jordan, 2008. "A productivity model of city crowdedness," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 715-722, March.
    9. Anselin, Luc, 2007. "Spatial econometrics in RSUE: Retrospect and prospect," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 450-456, July.
    10. Kevin Cullinane & Dong-Wook Song, 2003. "A stochastic frontier model of the productive efficiency of Korean container terminals," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 251-267.
    11. Amos Quaye & Charles Hall & Valerie Luzadis, 2010. "Agricultural land use efficiency and food crop production in Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(6), pages 967-983, December.
    12. JunJie Wu & Monica Fisher & Unai Pascual, 2011. "Urbanization and the Viability of Local Agricultural Economies," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 87(1), pages 109-125.
    13. Yao, Can-Zhong & Lin, Ji-Nan & Liu, Xiao-Feng, 2016. "A study of hierarchical structure on South China industrial electricity-consumption correlation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 444(C), pages 129-145.
    14. Philip Mccann & Stephen Sheppard, 2003. "The Rise, Fall and Rise Again of Industrial Location Theory," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6-7), pages 649-663.
    15. Shu, Hui & Xiong, Ping-ping, 2019. "Reallocation planning of urban industrial land for structure optimization and emission reduction: A practical analysis of urban agglomeration in China’s Yangtze River Delta," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 604-623.
    16. Wang, Jing & Lin, Yifan & Glendinning, Anthony & Xu, Yueqing, 2018. "Land-use changes and land policies evolution in China’s urbanization processes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 375-387.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florian Noseleit, 2020. "The Role of Entry and Market Selection for the Dynamics of Regional Diversity and Specialization," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 76-94, July.
    2. Jordi Jofre-Monseny & Raquel Marín-López & Elisabet Viladecans-Marsal, 2012. "What underlies localization and urbanization economies? Evidence from the location of new firms," Working Papers 2012/9, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    3. Edilberto Tiago de Almeida & Raul da Mota Silveira Neto & Roberta de Moraes Rocha, 2022. "Manufacturing location patterns in Brazil," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(4), pages 839-873, August.
    4. Guangya Zhou & Helian Xu & Chuanzeng Jiang & Shiqi Deng & Liming Chen & Zhi Zhang, 2024. "Has the Digital Economy Improved the Urban Land Green Use Efficiency? Evidence from the National Big Data Comprehensive Pilot Zone Policy," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Giordano Mion, 2013. "Input–Output Linkages, Proximity to Final Demand and the Location of Manufacturing Industries," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Riccardo Crescenzi & Marco Percoco (ed.), Geography, Institutions and Regional Economic Performance, edition 127, pages 237-262, Springer.
    6. Gilles Duranton & Diego Puga, 2001. "Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation, and the Life Cycle of Products," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1454-1477, December.
    7. Combes, Pierre-Philippe & Gobillon, Laurent, 2015. "The Empirics of Agglomeration Economies," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 247-348, Elsevier.
    8. Jennifer Day & Peter Ellis, 2013. "Growth in Indonesia's manufacturing sectors: Urban and localization contributions," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 343-368, August.
    9. Combes, Pierre-Philippe & Overman, Henry G., 2004. "The spatial distribution of economic activities in the European Union," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 64, pages 2845-2909, Elsevier.
    10. Giulio Cainelli & Andrea Fracasso & Giuseppe Vittucci Marzetti, 2015. "Spatial agglomeration and productivity in Italy: A panel smooth transition regression approach," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94, pages 39-67, November.
    11. van Soest, D.P. & Gerking, S.D. & van Oort, F.G., 2002. "Knowledge Externalities, Agglomeration Economies, and Employment Growth in Dutch Cities," Other publications TiSEM d3b82b0f-1b50-4845-98ce-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Carlos Carreira & Luís Lopes, 2020. "How are the potential gains from economic activity transmitted to the labour factor: more employment or more wages? Evidence from the Portuguese context," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 319-348, April.
    13. Cassey, Andrew J. & Smith, Ben O., 2014. "Simulating confidence for the Ellison–Glaeser index," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 85-103.
    14. Satyajit Chatterjee, 2006. "A quantitative assessment of the role of agglomeration economies in the spatial concentration of U.S. employment," Working Papers 06-20, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    15. Han, Yang & Zhang, Haotian & Zhao, Yong, 2021. "Structural evolution of real estate industry in China: 2002-2017," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 45-56.
    16. Jens Abildtrup & Virginie Piguet & Bertrand Schmitt, 2011. "The impact of agro-food industry on employment and population changes: The case of Denmark and France'," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1622, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Kun Ge & Shan Zou & Xinhai Lu & Shangan Ke & Danling Chen & Zhangsheng Liu, 2022. "Dynamic Evolution and the Mechanism behind the Coupling Coordination Relationship between Industrial Integration and Urban Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Zone in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Jordi Jofre-Monseny & Raquel Marín-López & Elisabet Viladecans-Marsal, 2012. "When are localization and urbanization economies important?," ERSA conference papers ersa12p820, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Jordi Jofre-Monseny & Raquel Marín-López & Elisabet Viladecans-Marsal, 2014. "The Determinants Of Localization And Urbanization Economies: Evidence From The Location Of New Firms In Spain," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 313-337, March.
    20. Koster, Hans R.A. & van Ommeren, Jos & Rietveld, Piet, 2014. "Estimation of semiparametric sorting models: Explaining geographical concentration of business services," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 14-28.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:105:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721001137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.