IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v81y2024icp63-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Belt and Road Initiative promote China and the countries along the route to reconstruct the global value chain? Evidence from value-added trade

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Hui
  • Si, Ieongcheng
  • Chen, Zhihua

Abstract

The current global value chain's (GVC) inequalities impede sustainable development in China and countries along the route (B&R countries), but the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) fosters mutual economic cooperation, offering an opportunity to deepen bilateral value chain cooperation and reconstruct GVC. Existing literature suggests that under BRI, GVC reconstruction between China and B&R countries is feasible and necessary, yet empirical evidence on BRI's impact and pathways is scarce. Treating this as a quasi-natural experiment, we analyse data from 54 countries (2007-2021) using a Difference-in-Differences approach. Results show that BRI significantly promotes GVC reconstruction between China and B&R countries, with effects strengthening over time. Moreover, the BRI's promotion effects are more pronounced for GVC reconstruction between China and Asian countries along the route and B&R countries with middle-low- & middle-high-incomes. Expanding bilateral trade, enhancing capacity cooperation, and improving infrastructure connectivity are key mechanisms through which BRI drives GVC reconstruction.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Hui & Si, Ieongcheng & Chen, Zhihua, 2024. "Does the Belt and Road Initiative promote China and the countries along the route to reconstruct the global value chain? Evidence from value-added trade," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 63-83.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:81:y:2024:i:c:p:63-83
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592623003119
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:81:y:2024:i:c:p:63-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.