IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chieco/v94y2025ipas1043951x25001701.html

Does food recall strategy have a positive or negative effect on trust repair? Moderation analysis based on trust violation types and trust disposition

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Xiaoyan
  • Fu, Jianyou
  • Tian, Yixing
  • Chen, Honghua

Abstract

Food recall is an important measure in food safety management. This study investigated the impact of food recall strategies on repairing consumer trust in food products. We examined three food recall strategies (voluntary, mandatory, and no recall) adopted by firms after discovering food defects. We designed a scenario-based experiment and used difference-in-differences (DID) models to analyze how these strategies influence consumer trust repair. Furthermore, we examined the moderating roles of trust violation type (competence vs. integrity) and consumer trust disposition. Our results show that both voluntary and mandatory recalls significantly enhance consumer trust in terms of competence, benevolence, and integrity. These findings contrast with previous studies and common consensus that food recalls tend to damage consumer perceptions. We also find that voluntary recalls are more effective than mandatory recalls for repairing consumer trust. Additionally, trust violation type and trust disposition moderate the effects of recall strategies on trust repair. These findings can help firms adopt the most effective trust repair strategies after discovering food defects, and assist regulators in restoring consumer confidence in food quality and safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Xiaoyan & Fu, Jianyou & Tian, Yixing & Chen, Honghua, 2025. "Does food recall strategy have a positive or negative effect on trust repair? Moderation analysis based on trust violation types and trust disposition," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:94:y:2025:i:pa:s1043951x25001701
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X25001701
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhou, Pei & Liu, Yizao, 2023. "Recall information heterogeneity and perceived health risk: The impact of food recall on fresh meat market in the U.S," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Lee, Yoon-Joo & Yoon, Hye Jin & O'Donnell, Nicole H., 2018. "The effects of information cues on perceived legitimacy of companies that promote corporate social responsibility initiatives on social networking sites," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 202-214.
    3. Bozic, Branko & Kuppelwieser, Volker G., 2019. "Customer trust recovery: An alternative explanation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 208-218.
    4. Steven Grover & Markus Hasel & Caroline Manville & Carolina Serrano-Archimi, 2014. "Follower reactions to leader trust violations: A grounded theory of violation types, likelihood of recovery, and recovery process," Post-Print hal-01796413, HAL.
    5. Byun, Kyung-Ah (Kay) & Duhan, Dale F. & Dass, Mayukh, 2020. "The preservation of loyalty halo effects: An investigation of the post-product-recall behavior of loyal customers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 163-175.
    6. Hobbs, Jill E. & Goddard, Ellen, 2015. "Consumers and trust," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 71-74.
    7. Yan Wan & Yifan Zhang & Fengting Wang & Yufei Yuan, 2023. "Retailer response to negative online consumer reviews: how can damaged trust be effectively repaired?," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 37-53, March.
    8. Jiuchang Wei & Ming Zhao & Fei Wang & Dingtao Zhao, 2016. "The effects of firm actions on customers’ responses to product recall crises: analyzing an automobile recall in China," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 425-443, April.
    9. Pozo, Veronica F. & Schroeder, Ted C., 2016. "Evaluating the costs of meat and poultry recalls to food firms using stock returns," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 66-77.
    10. Deon Filmer & Lant Pritchett, 2001. "Estimating Wealth Effects Without Expenditure Data—Or Tears: An Application To Educational Enrollments In States Of India," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 38(1), pages 115-132, February.
    11. Martyna Janowicz‐Panjaitan & Rekha Krishnan, 2009. "Measures for Dealing with Competence and Integrity Violations of Interorganizational Trust at the Corporate and Operating Levels of Organizational Hierarchy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 245-268, March.
    12. Kong, Dongmin & Shi, Lu & Yang, Zhiqing, 2019. "Product recalls, corporate social responsibility, and firm value: Evidence from the Chinese food industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 60-69.
    13. Alexander Mafael & Sascha Raithel & Stefan J. Hock, 2022. "Managing customer satisfaction after a product recall: the joint role of remedy, brand equity, and severity," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 174-194, January.
    14. Steven L. Grover & Markus Hasel & Caroline Manville & Carolina Serrano-Archimi, 2014. "Follower reactions to leader trust violations : A grounded theory of violation types, likelihood of recovery, and recovery process," Post-Print hal-02313149, HAL.
    15. Peake, Whitney O. & Detre, Joshua D. & Carlson, Clinton C., 2014. "One bad apple spoils the bunch? An exploration of broad consumption changes in response to food recalls," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 13-22.
    16. Kim, Peter H. & Dirks, Kurt T. & Cooper, Cecily D. & Ferrin, Donald L., 2006. "When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 49-65, January.
    17. Nakayachi, Kazuya & Watabe, Motoki, 2005. "Restoring trustworthiness after adverse events: The signaling effects of voluntary "Hostage Posting" on trust," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Chang-Dae Ham & Jeesun Kim, 2019. "The Role of CSR in Crises: Integration of Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the Persuasion Knowledge Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 353-372, August.
    19. Kathleen Cleeren & Marnik G. Dekimpe & Harald J. Heerde, 2017. "Marketing research on product-harm crises: a review, managerial implications, and an agenda for future research," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 593-615, September.
    20. Hannah Oh & John Bae & Sang‐Joon Kim & Ryan Choi, 2019. "Product recall as a way of responsible management of a firm: The roles of corporate social responsibility and board members' sense of ownership," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 902-915, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Huashan & Bapuji, Hari & Talluri, Srinivas & Singh, Prakash J., 2022. "A Cross-disciplinary review of product recall research: A stakeholder-stage framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Brühl, Rolf & Basel, Jörn S. & Kury, Max F., 2018. "Communication after an integrity-based trust violation: How organizational account giving affects trust," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 161-170.
    3. Kähkönen, T. & Blomqvist, K. & Gillespie, N. & Vanhala, M., 2021. "Employee trust repair: A systematic review of 20 years of empirical research and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 98-109.
    4. Chuanhui Liao & Yu Luo & Weiwei Zhu, 2020. "Food Safety Trust, Risk Perception, and Consumers’ Response to Company Trust Repair Actions in Food Recall Crises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Yaopan Yang & Songsong Li & Daquan Gao & Jin Wang, 2025. "Hold up an umbrella on rainy days: the insurance-like effects of brand equity and corporate social responsibility during Chinese product-harm crises," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Steven L. Grover & Marie-Aude Abid-Dupont & Caroline Manville & Markus C. Hasel, 2019. "Repairing Broken Trust Between Leaders and Followers: How Violation Characteristics Temper Apologies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 853-870, March.
    7. Mukherjee, Arka & Chauhan, Satyaveer S., 2021. "The impact of product recall on advertising decisions and firm profit while envisioning crisis or being hazard myopic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 953-970.
    8. Xu, Mingli & Yang, Wei & Huang, Zhixiong, 2021. "Do investor relations matter in the tourism industry? Evidence from public opinions in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 923-933.
    9. Nina Tomaževič & Aleksander Aristovnik, 2019. "Factors of Trust in Immediate Leaders: An Empirical Study in Police Service Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Bob Fennis & Wolfgang Stroebe, 2014. "Softening the Blow: Company Self-Disclosure of Negative Information Lessens Damaging Effects on Consumer Judgment and Decision Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 109-120, March.
    11. Lili Wan, 2016. "Tactics to Restore Damaged Customer Relationship after Negative Events," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(6), pages 132-137, June.
    12. Ollinger, Michael, 2024. "Recall characteristics and food safety process control," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    13. Chen Wang & Yeonggil Kim & Changhee Kim, 2022. "Are all CSR Activities in Your SNS Authentic? The Antecedents and Outcomes of Consumer Perceived Authenticity of CSR," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, November.
    14. Jianbin Yu & Neal H. Hooker, 2024. "Exploring factors influencing repeated recalls in the US meat and poultry industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 825-845, October.
    15. Hornsey, Matthew J. & Chapman, Cassandra M. & La Macchia, Stephen & Loakes, Jennifer, 2024. "Corporate apologies are effective because reform signals are weighted more heavily than culpability signals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    16. Chuanhui Liao & Huang Yu & Weiwei Zhu, 2020. "Perceived Knowledge, Coping Efficacy and Consumer Consumption Changes in Response to Food Recall," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Anna M. Cianci & Shana M. Clor-Proell & Steven E. Kaplan, 2019. "How Do Investors Respond to Restatements? Repairing Trust Through Managerial Reputation and the Announcement of Corrective Actions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 297-312, August.
    18. Shijiao Chen & Jing A. Zhang & Hongzhi Gao & Zhilin Yang & Damien Mather, 2022. "Trust Erosion During Industry-Wide Crises: The Central Role of Consumer Legitimacy Judgement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 95-116, January.
    19. Hommelhoff, Sabine & Richter, David, 2017. "Refuting the cliché of the distrustful manager," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 164-173.
    20. Schniter, Eric & Sheremeta, Roman M. & Sznycer, Daniel, 2013. "Building and rebuilding trust with promises and apologies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 242-256.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:94:y:2025:i:pa:s1043951x25001701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chieco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.