IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/asieco/v91y2024ics1049007824000022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does it pay to be green? The impact of emissions reduction on corporate tax burden

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Huaqing
  • Wang, Ling
  • Peng, Fei

Abstract

Is there any benefit to reducing emissions for firms? Based on the China Industrial Enterprises Emission and Pollution Database and the Annual Survey of Industrial Firms, this study investigates the impact of firms’ emissions reduction on their tax burden. We find strong and consistent evidence of a significant reduction in the tax burden following a reduction of firms polluting emissions. This effect mainly manifests in large-scale firms, firms whose taxes are collected by the local taxation bureaus (LTB), and firms in regions with stricter environmental regulations. We also find that tax breaks and government subsidies are important pathways to reduce corporate tax burden. Further exploration documents that firms’ bargaining power and local tax enforcement have significantly moderating effects on the relationship between firms’ emissions reduction and their tax burden.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Huaqing & Wang, Ling & Peng, Fei, 2024. "Does it pay to be green? The impact of emissions reduction on corporate tax burden," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:asieco:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s1049007824000022
    DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049007824000022
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101707?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Green; Emissions reduction; Corporate tax burden; China;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:asieco:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s1049007824000022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/asieco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.