Author
Abstract
The transition to low-carbon technologies in agriculture has drawn increasing attention, with battery electric tractors (BETs) emerging as a promising alternative to conventional diesel-powered machinery. This study presents a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines to assess the economic feasibility of BETs and factors influencing farmers’ willingness to adopt them. We searched Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2018 and 2025. A total of 635 studies were retrieved, of which 16 studies were included, covering both techno-economic evaluation and farmer-focused adoption perspectives. Our findings indicate that BETs can be economically competitive under specific conditions, particularly in low-duty applications with high annual usage hours, and that their viability is further enhanced by financial incentives, declining battery costs, and integration into farm-level energy systems (e.g., photovoltaic generation), supportive electricity tariffs, and enabling policy frameworks, with additional potential in autonomous applications. The review shows that farmers’ adoption of BETs is primarily constrained by economic barriers, particularly high upfront investment costs and uncertainties related to battery performance, operational autonomy, and associated expenses. While non-economic factors such as environmental awareness, user comfort, and behavioral attitudes act as important motivators, the evidence indicates that financial viability constitutes a prerequisite for broader uptake across farm contexts. Widespread BET adoption will require both technological improvements and supportive policies, as well as knowledge dissemination to reduce uncertainty and build trust. These insights provide guidance for policymakers, technology developers, and researchers aiming to accelerate the adoption of low-carbon agricultural machinery.
Suggested Citation
Kozak, Olga & Bonev, Petyo, 2026.
"The economic feasibility and farmers’ adoption of battery electric tractors: a systematic literature review,"
Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:appene:v:415:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926005659
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127913
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:415:y:2026:i:c:s0306261926005659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.