IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v394y2025ics030626192500772x.html

Perceived complexity and effectiveness of dynamic electricity rate designs for smart markets

Author

Listed:
  • Staudt, Philipp
  • Dann, David

Abstract

The energy transition and ongoing electrification require shifting from flat electricity rate designs to dynamic technology-enabled rate structures communicating economic signals in smart markets. Empirical data show that the acceptance of such dynamic rate designs is low, but there is a lack of evidence to explain the causes of this shortfall. In a within-subject online experiment with 271 participants, we evaluate the perceived complexity and system balancing effectiveness of four dynamic rate designs that differ in temporal and spatial characteristics. We find that both higher temporal and spatial granularity increase perceived complexity and the effectiveness of balancing supply and demand, respectively. Furthermore, we find evidence of an impact of individually perceived complexity on financial success from rate designs and diverging effects of financial success on the effectiveness of balancing supply and demand in the rate designs. The majority of participants prefer less complex rate designs, partly because of reduced perceived uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Staudt, Philipp & Dann, David, 2025. "Perceived complexity and effectiveness of dynamic electricity rate designs for smart markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 394(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:394:y:2025:i:c:s030626192500772x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626192500772X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacob Mays & Diego Klabjan, 2017. "Optimization of Time-Varying Electricity Rates," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 5).
    2. Severin Borenstein, 2007. "Customer Risk from Real-Time Retail Electricity Pricing: Bill Volatility and Hedgability," The Energy Journal, , vol. 28(2), pages 111-130, April.
    3. Winzer, Christian & Ramírez-Molina, Héctor & Hirth, Lion & Schlecht, Ingmar, 2024. "Profile contracts for electricity retail customers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    4. Martin Bichler & Alok Gupta & Wolfgang Ketter, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Designing Smart Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 688-699, December.
    5. Guo, Bowei & Weeks, Melvyn, 2022. "Dynamic tariffs, demand response, and regulation in retail electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    6. Qiu, Yueming & Colson, Gregory & Wetzstein, Michael E., 2017. "Risk preference and adverse selection for participation in time-of-use electricity pricing programs," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 126-142.
    7. Tim Schittekatte & Dharik Mallapragada & Paul L. Joskow & Richard Schmalensee, 2024. "Electricity Retail Rate Design in a Decarbonizing Economy: An Analysis of Time-of-use and Critical Peak Pricing," The Energy Journal, , vol. 45(3), pages 25-56, May.
    8. Paul Simshauser & David Downer, 2016. "On the Inequity of Flat-rate Electricity Tariffs," The Energy Journal, , vol. 37(3), pages 199-230, July.
    9. William Vickrey, 1961. "Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 16(1), pages 8-37, March.
    10. Jay Zarnikau, 1990. "Customer Responsiveness to Real-Time Pricing of Electricity," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), pages 99-116.
    11. Scott P. Burger, Christopher R. Knittel, Ignacio J. Perez-Arriaga, Ian Schneider, and Frederik vom Scheidt, 2020. "The Efficiency and Distributional Effects of Alternative Residential Electricity Rate Designs," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    12. Eric J. Johnson & John W. Payne, 1985. "Effort and Accuracy in Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 395-414, April.
    13. Anselma Wörner & Verena Tiefenbeck & Felix Wortmann & Arne Meeuw & Liliane Ableitner & Elgar Fleisch & Inês Azevedo, 2022. "Bidding on a Peer-to-Peer Energy Market: An Exploratory Field Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 794-808, September.
    14. Nicolas Astier and Thomas-Olivier Léautier, 2021. "Demand Response: Smart Market Designs for Smart Consumers," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3), pages 153-176.
    15. Lion Hirth, 2018. "What Caused the Drop in European Electricity Prices? A Factor Decomposition Analysis," The Energy Journal, , vol. 39(1), pages 143-158, January.
    16. Peter Cramton, 2017. "Electricity market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 589-612.
    17. Micha Kahlen & Karsten Schroer & Wolfgang Ketter & Alok Gupta, 2024. "Smart Markets for Real-Time Allocation of Multiproduct Resources: The Case of Shared Electric Vehicles," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 871-889, June.
    18. Severin Borenstein, 2002. "The Trouble With Electricity Markets: Understanding California's Restructuring Disaster," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(1), pages 191-211, Winter.
    19. Nicolas Astier & Thomas-Olivier Léautier, 2021. "Demand Response: Smart Market Designs for Smart Consumers," The Energy Journal, , vol. 42(3), pages 153-176, May.
    20. Scott P. Burger & Christopher R. Knittel & Ignacio J. Perez-Arriaga & Ian Schneider & Frederik vom Scheidt, 2020. "The Efficiency and Distributional Effects of Alternative Residential Electricity Rate Designs," The Energy Journal, , vol. 41(1), pages 199-240, January.
    21. Dütschke, Elisabeth & Paetz, Alexandra-Gwyn, 2013. "Dynamic electricity pricing—Which programs do consumers prefer?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 226-234.
    22. Bjarghov, Sigurd & Farahmand, Hossein & Doorman, Gerard, 2022. "Capacity subscription grid tariff efficiency and the impact of uncertainty on the subscribed level," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    23. Jacob Mays & Diego Klabjan, 2017. "Optimization of Time-Varying Electricity Rates," The Energy Journal, , vol. 38(5), pages 67-92, September.
    24. Thomas Morstyn & Niall Farrell & Sarah J. Darby & Malcolm D. McCulloch, 2018. "Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(2), pages 94-101, February.
    25. Henni, Sarah & Staudt, Philipp & Weinhardt, Christof, 2021. "A sharing economy for residential communities with PV-coupled battery storage: Benefits, pricing and participant matching," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    26. Ketter, W., 2014. "Envisioning and Enabling Sustainable Smart Markets," ERIM Inaugural Address Series Research in Management EIA-2014-057-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam..
    27. Brian E. Roe & David R. Just, 2009. "Internal and External Validity in Economics Research: Tradeoffs between Experiments, Field Experiments, Natural Experiments, and Field Data," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1266-1271.
    28. Lion Hirth, 2018. "What caused the drop in European electricity prices? A factor decomposition analysis," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    29. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    30. Askeland, Magnus & Backe, Stian & Bjarghov, Sigurd & Korpås, Magnus, 2021. "Helping end-users help each other: Coordinating development and operation of distributed resources through local power markets and grid tariffs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    31. Zhang, Chenghua & Wu, Jianzhong & Zhou, Yue & Cheng, Meng & Long, Chao, 2018. "Peer-to-Peer energy trading in a Microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 1-12.
    32. Nicolson, Moira L. & Fell, Michael J. & Huebner, Gesche M., 2018. "Consumer demand for time of use electricity tariffs: A systematized review of the empirical evidence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 276-289.
    33. Teng, Fei & Aunedi, Marko & Strbac, Goran, 2016. "Benefits of flexibility from smart electrified transportation and heating in the future UK electricity system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 420-431.
    34. Smith, Vernon L, 1976. "Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 66(2), pages 274-279, May.
    35. Ahmad Faruqui & Sanem Sergici, 2010. "Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 193-225, October.
    36. Dash, Ganesh & Paul, Justin, 2021. "CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    37. Paul L. Joskow & Catherine D. Wolfram, 2012. "Dynamic Pricing of Electricity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(3), pages 381-385, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julien Ancel, 2025. "Tariffs time-dynamics in competitive electricity retail markets with differentiated consumer reactions," Post-Print hal-05100663, HAL.
    2. Lu, Yucun & Gorrasi, Chiara & Meus, Jelle & Bruninx, Kenneth & Delarue, Erik, 2024. "System-wide benefits of temporal alignment of wholesale–retail electricity prices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    3. Yan Chen & Peter Cramton & John A. List & Axel Ockenfels, 2021. "Market Design, Human Behavior, and Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5317-5348, September.
    4. Winzer, Christian & Ramírez-Molina, Héctor & Hirth, Lion & Schlecht, Ingmar, 2024. "Profile contracts for electricity retail customers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    5. Nakai, Miwa & von Loessl, Victor & Wetzel, Heike, 2024. "Preferences for dynamic electricity tariffs: A comparison of households in Germany and Japan," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    6. Spiller, Elisheba & Esparza, Ricardo & Mohlin, Kristina & Tapia-Ahumada, Karen & Ünel, Burçin, 2023. "The role of electricity tariff design in distributed energy resource deployment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Andrew J. Hinchberger & Mark R. Jacobsen & Christopher R. Knittel & James M. Sallee & Arthur A. van Benthem, 2024. "The Efficiency of Dynamic Electricity Prices," CESifo Working Paper Series 11355, CESifo.
    8. Ancel, Julien, 2025. "Tariffs time-dynamics in competitive electricity retail markets with differentiated consumer reactions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    9. Takanori Ida, Kayo Murakami, and Makoto Tanaka, 2016. "Electricity demand response in Japan: Experimental evidence from a residential photovoltaic power-generation system," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    10. Nolan Ritter & Julia Anna Bingler, 2021. "Do homo sapiens know their prices? Insights on dysfunctional price mechanisms from a large field experiment," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 21/348, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    11. Maarten Wolsink, 2020. "Framing in Renewable Energy Policies: A Glossary," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-31, June.
    12. Hortay, Olivér & Kökény, László, 2020. "A villamosenergia-fogyasztás elhalasztásával kapcsolatos lakossági attitűd felmérése Magyarországon [A survey of popular attitudes to deferment of electricity consumption in Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 657-687.
    13. Nilsson, A. & Bartusch, C., 2025. "Consumer perspectives on demand-based electricity tariffs: Lessons from a Swedish pilot study," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    14. Clastres, Cédric & Khalfallah, Haikel, 2021. "Dynamic pricing efficiency with strategic retailers and consumers: An analytical analysis of short-term market interactions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. Cao, K.H. & Qi, H.S. & Tsai, C.H. & Woo, C.K. & Zarnikau, J., 2021. "Energy trading efficiency in the US Midcontinent electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    16. Freier, Julia & von Loessl, Victor, 2022. "Dynamic electricity tariffs: Designing reasonable pricing schemes for private households," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    17. Pretto, Madeline, 2021. "Tail-risk Comprehension and Protection in Real-time Electricity Pricing : Experimental Evidence," Warwick-Monash Economics Student Papers 25, Warwick Monash Economics Student Papers.
    18. Mitridati, Lesia & Kazempour, Jalal & Pinson, Pierre, 2021. "Design and game-Theoretic analysis of community-Based market mechanisms in heat and electricity systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Chris Johnathon & Ashish Prakash Agalgaonkar & Joel Kennedy & Chayne Planiden, 2021. "Analyzing Electricity Markets with Increasing Penetration of Large-Scale Renewable Power Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    20. Paul L. Joskow, 2012. "Creating a Smarter U.S. Electricity Grid," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 26(1), pages 29-48, Winter.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:394:y:2025:i:c:s030626192500772x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.