IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from open field-grown Florida tomato production

  • Jones, Curtis D.
  • Fraisse, Clyde W.
  • Ozores-Hampton, Monica
Registered author(s):

    Agriculture is a significant contributor to rising atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) levels, which is expected to result in sea level rise and increased frequency of extreme weather events and is of increasing global concern. Tomatoes are an important agricultural commodity in Florida, accounting for 40% of the fresh market production in the United States. Quantification of GHG emissions from typical tomato production in Florida could improve understanding of the impact of different GHG emissions sources and identification of areas for potential GHG emissions reductions. A practical methodology was implemented to calculate a representative GHG emissions estimate using production inputs and practices used by the Florida tomato industry. Experts and grower surveys were used to characterize typical Florida tomato production practices. Existing methodologies were used to convert material use and farm operations into GHG emissions estimates. Results indicated that, depending on irrigation system type and water source, the overall average estimates of GHG emissions associated with a growing season ranged from 16,183kgCO2-eqha−1 (0.19kgCO2-eqkgfruit−1) to 22,426kgCO2-eqha−1 (0.27kgCO2-eqkgfruit−1). Irrigation and nitrogen (N) fertilizer accounted for the most emissions, with irrigation accounting for between 2.8% and 26.6% of average GHG emissions and N fertilizer accounting for between 17.7% and 22.8%. It was concluded that increased efficiency in irrigation and N use, and improved methods for polyethylene mulch use and disposal, were the best areas for GHG emissions reductions.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Agricultural Systems.

    Volume (Year): 113 (2012)
    Issue (Month): C ()
    Pages: 64-72

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:113:y:2012:i:c:p:64-72
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:113:y:2012:i:c:p:64-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamier, Wendy)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.