IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agecon/v17y1997i2-3p147-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Four case studies of agri-food CVDs and a proposal for reforming national administered protection agencies

Author

Listed:
  • Meilke, Karl D.
  • Sarker, Rakhal

Abstract

This paper reviews the role of national administered protection agencies, whose primary responsibility is the enforcement of national teade remedy laws. After reviewing four recent cases of trade disputes between Canada and the United States, it is argued that the role of national administered protection agencies should be changed. The growth of regional trading blocks, the increasing use of anti‐dumping and countervailing duty actions against fairly traded imports and the additional responsibilities assumed by the WTO in administering the Agreement on Agriculture strongly suggest that all trade disputes should be taken to the WTO for settlement. The role of national administered protection agencies should be changed to make them agents for trade liberalization. This would involve these agencies taking on three primary functions: (i) as transparency agents; (ii) as investigatory agents; and (iii) as advocacy agents.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Meilke, Karl D. & Sarker, Rakhal, 1997. "Four case studies of agri-food CVDs and a proposal for reforming national administered protection agencies," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 17(2-3), pages 147-164, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agecon:v:17:y:1997:i:2-3:p:147-164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169-5150(97)00022-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giancarlo Moschini & Karl D. Meilke, 1992. "Production Subsidy and Countervailing Duties in Vertically Related Markets: The Hog-Pork Case Between Canada and the United States," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(4), pages 951-961.
    2. Meilke, Karl D. & Moschini, GianCarlo, 1992. "Chronicle of Canadian Hog Stabilization Programs and U.S. Countervailing Duties on Hogs and Pork (A)," Staff General Research Papers Archive 659, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Julian M. Alston & Richard Gray & Daniel A. Sumner, 1994. "The Wheat War of 1994," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 42(3), pages 231-251, November.
    4. Jeffrey J. Schott, 1994. "Uruguay Round: An Assessment," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 64, January.
    5. Meilke, Karl D. & Scally, M., 1988. "Trade In Vertically Related Markets: The Case Of Hogs And Pork," Working Papers 123568, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    6. Karl D. Meilke, 1991. "Methods of Measuring Net Benefits for Agriculture," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 39(4), pages 823-834, December.
    7. Michele Veeman, 1994. "Implications of NAFTA and GATT for the Canadian Red Meat Sector," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 42(4), pages 473-483, December.
    8. Tripathy, Sudhakar & Srinivasa Gowda, M.V., 1995. "Sources of Variability of Foodgrains Production in Orissa," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 50(4).
    9. John Spriggs, 1991. "Towards an International Transparency Institution: Australian Style," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 165-180, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mario Larch & Jeff Luckstead & Yoto V. Yotov, 2024. "Economic sanctions and agricultural trade," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(4), pages 1477-1517, August.
    2. Young, Linda M., 2002. "Alternatives To Current Trade Remedy Law Within Nafta," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19679, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Meilke, Karl D. & Rude, James & Zahniser, Steven, 2006. "The Search for "NAFTA Plus"," 2006 NAAMIC Workshop III: Achieving NAFTA Plus 163881, North American Agrifood Market Integration Consortium (NAAMIC).
    4. Sarker, Rakhal & Ratnesena, Shashini, 2014. "Revealed Comparative Advantage and Half-A-Century Competitiveness of Canadian Agriculture: A Case Study of Wheat, Beef and Pork Sectors," Working Papers 165675, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    5. Knutson, Ronald D. & Ochoa, Rene F., 2005. "Market and Policy Integration in Times of Crisis," 2005 NAAMIC Workshop II: Agrifood Regulatory and Policy Integration under Stress 163864, North American Agrifood Market Integration Consortium (NAAMIC).
    6. John Wainio & Linda M. Young & Karl Meilke, 2003. "Trade Remedy Actions in NAFTA: Agriculture and Agri‐Food Industries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(7), pages 1041-1065, July.
    7. Dell'Aquila, Crescenzo & Sarker, Rakhal & Meilke, Karl D., 1999. "Regionalism And Trade In Agrifood Products," Working Papers 14591, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    8. Unknown, 2006. "Agrifood Regulatory and Policy Integration Under Stress," 2005 NAAMIC Workshop II: Agrifood Regulatory and Policy Integration under Stress 252451, North American Agrifood Market Integration Consortium (NAAMIC).
    9. Anonymous & Meilke, Karl D. & Knutson, Ronald D. & Ochoa, Rene F. & Rude, James, 2005. "Agrifood Regulatory and Policy Integration Under Stress," 2005 NAAMIC Workshop II: Agrifood Regulatory and Policy Integration under Stress 163858, North American Agrifood Market Integration Consortium (NAAMIC).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meilke, Karl D. & Sarker, Rakhal, 1995. "National Administered Protection Agencies: Their Role in the Post-Uruguay Round World," 1995: Understanding Technical Barriers to Agricultural Trade Conference, December 1995, Tucson, Arizona 50714, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    2. Sarker, Rakhal & Ratnesena, Shashini, 2014. "Revealed Comparative Advantage and Half-A-Century Competitiveness of Canadian Agriculture: A Case Study of Wheat, Beef and Pork Sectors," Working Papers 165675, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    3. James Rude & Yves Surry, 2014. "Canadian Hog Supply Response: A Provincial Level Analysis," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 62(2), pages 149-169, June.
    4. J. Mutti & R. Sampson & B. Yeung, 2000. "The effects of the Uruguay round: empirical evidence from U.S. industry," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 18(1), pages 59-69, January.
    5. Aradhna Aggarwal, 2003. "Patterns and determinants of anti-dumping: A worldwide perspective," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 113, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    6. Paqué, Karl-Heinz & Stehn, Jürgen & Horn, Ernst-Jürgen & Scharrer, Hans-Eckart & Koopmann, Georg, 1996. "National technology policies and international friction: Theory, evidence, and policy options," Kiel Discussion Papers 279, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    7. Unknown, 2006. "Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Volume 2, Number 2, Fall 2006," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 2(2).
    8. Siegfried Bender & Kui-Wai Li, 2002. "The Changing Trade and Revealed Comparative Advantages of Asian and Latin American Manufacture Exports," Working Papers 843, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    9. Anderson, David P. & Mintert, James R. & Brester, Gary W., 1998. "The North American Livestock Industry: A U.S. Perspective," Proceedings of the 4th Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop 1998: Economic Harmonization in the Canadian\U.S.\Mexican Grain-Livestock Subsector; 16765, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    10. Michael D. Bordo & Barry Eichengreen & Douglas A. Irwin, 1999. "Is Globalization Today Really Different than Globalization a Hunderd Years Ago?," NBER Working Papers 7195, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Peter G. WARR, 1997. "The Uruguay Round And The Developing Countries: Thailand And The Philippines," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 35(2), pages 142-165, June.
    12. Yavapolkul, Navin & Gopinath, Munisamy & Gulati, Ashok, 2004. "Post-Uruguay Round price linkages between developed and developing countries," MTID discussion papers 76, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Weerahewa, Jeevika & Meilke, Karl D. & Le Roy, Danny G., 2008. "An Economic Assessment of the BSE Crisis in Canada: Impact of Border Closure and BSE Recovery Programs," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26.
    14. Sckokai, Paolo, 2001. "The Common Agricultural Policy In Econometric Models," Working Papers 14800, National Institute of Agricultural Economics, Italy - INEA, Osservatorio Sulle Politiche Agricole dell'UE.
    15. Seyoum, Emayenesh & Goddard, Ellen & MacLaren, Donald & Griffith, Garry, 2002. "Modelling World Dairy Trade: The Potential Impact of Officially Supported Export Credits on the Australian Dairy Industry," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 183422, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    16. Koo, Won W. & Uhm, Ihn H., 2000. "U.S.-Canada Border Disputes In Grains: Dynamic Interface Between The Free Trade Agreement And Trade Remedy Laws," Agricultural Economics Reports 23267, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    17. Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L., 1998. "Reciprocal Access In U.S./Canadian Grain Trade: Background Issues For The U.S. Grain Trade," AE Series 23085, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    18. Babula, Ronald A. & Bessler, David A. & Payne, Warren S., 2003. "Dynamic Relationships Among Selected U.S. Commodity-Based, Value Added Markets: Applying Directed Acyclic Graphs to a Time Series Model," Working Paper ID Series 15879, United States International Trade Commission, Office of Industries.
    19. Brink, Lars, 1993. "PSE for Beef in Canada: An Examination of Methods," Working Papers 244115, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    20. Rickard, Bradley J. & Gonsalves, Jana L., 2008. "How would compliance with dietary recommendations affect revenues for agricultural producers?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 422-433, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agecon:v:17:y:1997:i:2-3:p:147-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/agec .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.