Collusive Market Sharing with Spatial Competition
This paper develops a spatial model to analyze the stability of a market sharing agreement between two firms. We find that the stability of the cartel depends on the relative market size of each firm. Collusion is not attractive for firms with a small home market, but the incentive for collusion increases when the firm's home market is getting larger relative to the home market of the competitor. The highest stability of a cartel and additionally the highest social welfare is found when regions are symmetric.
Volume (Year): 32 (2012)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| |
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Belleflamme, Paul & Bloch, Francis, 2008.
"Sustainable collusion on separate markets,"
Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 384-386, May.
- Kai Andree, 2013.
"Collusion in Spatially Separated Markets with Quantity Competition,"
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade,
Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 309-318, September.
- Kai Andree, 2011. "Collusion in spatially separated markets with quantity competition," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 104, Universität Potsdam, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät.
- John Gross & William L. Holahan, 2003. "Credible Collusion in Spatially Separated Markets," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 44(1), pages 299-312, February.
- Thisse, J.-F. & Vives, X., 1987.
"On the strategic choice of spatial price policy,"
CORE Discussion Papers
1987008, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
- Tharakan, Joe & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2001.
"The Importance of Being Small. Or When Countries are Areas and not Points,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
2938, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Tharakan, Joe & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 2002. "The importance of being small. Or when countries are areas and not points," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 381-408, May.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-12-00782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (John P. Conley)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.