IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-11-00243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A stackelberg duopoly with binary choices of objectives

Author

Listed:
  • Athanasia Mavrommati

    () (Department of Economics, University of Crete)

Abstract

This paper analyzes a Stackelberg model where firms choose their objective functions (profit or revenue) in order to achieve maximum payoff. The objective of the present work is to demonstrate that depending on the unit cost of production, firms make either asymmetric choices of objectives (low values of the unit cost) or symmetric choices (high values of the unit cost). As a result of these choices, the payoff advantage alternates between the first and the second mover in the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Athanasia Mavrommati, 2012. "A stackelberg duopoly with binary choices of objectives," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(1), pages 843-853.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-11-00243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2012/Volume32/EB-12-V32-I1-P79.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Kopel & Clemens Löffler, 2008. "Commitment, first-mover-, and second-mover advantage," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 143-166, July.
    2. Vardy, Felix, 2004. "The value of commitment in Stackelberg games with observation costs," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 374-400, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    endogenous objectives; revenue objective; profit objective; first-mover advantage; second-mover advantage.;

    JEL classification:

    • D4 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design
    • L1 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-11-00243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (John P. Conley). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.