IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwvjh/83-1-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kindertagesbetreuung: wie wird ihre Nutzung beeinflusst und was kann sie für die Entwicklung von Kindern bewirken?

Author

Listed:
  • Kai-Uwe Müller
  • C. Katharina Spieß
  • Katharina Wrohlich

Abstract

More and more children in Germany attend formal day care. How does family policy influence this attendance? Which effect do particular family policies have and in how far do these effects differ among different family types? This question is dealt with in the first part of this contribution. It shows that attendance is positively influenced by public funding of formal day care whereas other benefits, such as joint taxation of married couples, have a negative effect on the attendance of formal day care. The second part examines in how far formal day care, which varies in duration of attendance, can influence childrens' shortand middle-term development. There is evidence in favor of such a relationship, yet quality of day care is of great importance in this context. In summary this contribution shows that public funding of formal child care significantly influences the attendance formal day care and that it does so to a larger extent than all of the other examined family policies. Further, it shows that attendance of formal day care can positively affect the development of children. Immer mehr Kinder in Deutschland nutzen eine Kindertagesbetreuung. Wie beeinflusst die Familienpolitik diese Nutzung? Wie wirken einzelne ehe- und familienpolitische Maßnahmen und inwiefern unterscheiden sich diese Wirkungen für unterschiedliche Familientypen? Diesen Fragen widmet sich der erste Teil dieses Beitrags. Er zeigt, dass insbesondere die öffentliche Finanzierung der Kindertagesbetreuung deren Nutzung positiv beeinflusst, während andere Leistungen wie zum Beispiel das Ehegattensplitting einen negativen Effekt auf die Nutzung der Kindertagesbetreuung haben. In einem zweiten Teil wird untersucht, inwiefern die in ihrer Dauer variierende Nutzung die Entwicklung von Kindern kurz- bis mittelfristig beeinflussen kann. Dazu liefern die Analysen ebenfalls kurz- bis mittelfristige Evidenz. Allerdings ist hierbei die Qualität der Betreuung von Bedeutung. Zusammenfassend zeigt der Beitrag, dass die öffentliche Förderung der Kindertagesbetreuung - stärker als die anderen untersuchten Leistungen - deren Nutzung signifikant beeinflusst und dass diese Nutzung wiederum auf die Entwicklung von Kindern positiv wirken kann.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai-Uwe Müller & C. Katharina Spieß & Katharina Wrohlich, 2014. "Kindertagesbetreuung: wie wird ihre Nutzung beeinflusst und was kann sie für die Entwicklung von Kindern bewirken?," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(1), pages 49-67.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:83-1-4
    DOI: 10.3790/vjh.83.1.49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.83.1.49
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/vjh.83.1.49?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viktor Steiner & Katharina Wrohlich & Peter Haan & Johannes Geyer, 2012. "Documentation of the Tax-Benefit Microsimulation Model STSM: Version 2012," Data Documentation 63, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Tarjei Havnes & Magne Mogstad, 2011. "No Child Left Behind: Subsidized Child Care and Children's Long-Run Outcomes," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 3(2), pages 97-129, May.
    3. Nicole Schmiade & C. Katharina Spieß & Wolfgang Tietze, 2008. "Zur Erhebung des adaptiven Verhaltens von zwei- und dreijährigen Kindern im Sozio-oekonomischen Panel (SOEP)," Data Documentation 35, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    4. Datta Gupta, Nabanita & Simonsen, Marianne, 2010. "Non-cognitive child outcomes and universal high quality child care," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(1-2), pages 30-43, February.
    5. Holger Bonin & Anita Fichtl & Helmut Rainer & C. Katharina Spieß & Holger Stichnoth & Katharina Wrohlich, 2013. "Zentrale Resultate der Gesamtevaluation familienbezogener Leistungen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 80(40), pages 3-13.
    6. Katharina Wrohlich, 2006. "Labor Supply and Child Care Choices in a Rationed Child Care Market," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 570, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    7. Katharina Wrohlich & Eva Berger & Johannes Geyer & Peter Haan & Denise Sengül & C. Katharina Spieß & Andreas Thiemann, 2012. "Elterngeld Monitor: Endbericht; Forschungsprojekt im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 61, number pbk61, Enero-Abr.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Holger Bonin & Reinhold Schnabel & Holger Stichnoth, 2014. "Zur Effizienz der ehe- und familienbezogenen Leistungen in Deutschland im Hinblick auf soziale Sicherungs- und Beschäftigungsziele," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(1), pages 29-48.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christina Gathmann & Björn Sass, 2012. "Taxing Childcare: Effects on Family Labor Supply and Children," CESifo Working Paper Series 3776, CESifo.
    2. Busse, Anna & Gathmann, Christina, 2018. "Free Daycare and its Effects on Children and their Families," IZA Discussion Papers 11269, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Busse, Anna & Gathmann, Christina, 2015. "The Effects of Free Childcare on Labor Supply and Children," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 113078, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Nabanita Datta Gupta & Jonas Jessen, 2023. "Maternity leave versus early childcare—What are the long-term consequences for children?," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 438-438, May.
    5. Natalia Danzer & Martin Halla & Nicole Schneeweis & Martina Zweimüller, 2022. "Parental Leave, (In)formal Childcare, and Long-Term Child Outcomes," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 57(6), pages 1826-1884.
    6. Givord, Pauline & Marbot, Claire, 2015. "Does the cost of child care affect female labor market participation? An evaluation of a French reform of childcare subsidies," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 99-111.
    7. Ando, Michihito & Mori, Hiroaki & Yamaguchi, Shintaro, 2022. "Universal early childhood education and adolescent risky behavior," SocArXiv rnkgs, Center for Open Science.
    8. Datta Gupta, Nabanita & Lausten, Mette & Pozzoli, Dario, 2012. "Does Mother Know Best? Parental Discrepancies in Assessing Child Functioning," IZA Discussion Papers 6962, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Lauber, Verena & Thomas, Lampert, 2014. "The Effect of Early Universal Daycare on Child Weight Problems," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100399, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    10. Jo Blanden & Emilia Del Bono & Sandra McNally & Birgitta Rabe, 2016. "Universal Pre‐school Education: The Case of Public Funding with Private Provision," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(592), pages 682-723, May.
    11. Cuong Viet Nguyen, 2022. "The effect of preschool attendance on Children's health: Evidence from a lower middle‐income country," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(8), pages 1558-1589, August.
    12. Christina Felfe, 2015. "Childcare and Child Development," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 13(1), pages 16-19, 04.
    13. Johannes Geyer & Thorben Korfhage, 2015. "Long‐term Care Insurance and Carers' Labor Supply – A Structural Model," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(9), pages 1178-1191, September.
    14. Peter, Frauke H. & Schober, Pia S. & Spiess, Katharina C., 2016. "Early Birds in Day Care: The Social Gradient in Starting Day Care and Children’s Non-cognitive Skills," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 62(4), pages 725-751.
    15. Michael J. Kottelenberg & Steven F. Lehrer, 2018. "Does Quebecs subsidized child care policy give boys and girls an equal start?," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 51(2), pages 627-659, May.
    16. Christina Felfe & Natalia Nollenberger & Núria Rodríguez-Planas, 2015. "Can’t buy mommy’s love? Universal childcare and children’s long-term cognitive development," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 28(2), pages 393-422, April.
    17. Mari Rege & Ingunn Størksen & Ingeborg F. Solli & Ariel Kalil & Megan McClelland & Dieuwer ten Braak & Ragnhild Lenes & Svanaug Lunde & Svanhild Breive & Martin Carlsen & Ingvald Erfjord & Per S. Hund, 2019. "Promoting Child Development in a Universal Preschool System: A Field Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 7775, CESifo.
    18. Laia Bosque-Mercader, 2022. "The Effect of a Universal Preschool Programme on Long-Term Health Outcomes: Evidence from Spain," Working Papers 2022-07, FEDEA.
    19. Emre Akgunduz & Egbert Jongen & Paul P.M. Leseman & Janneke Plantenga, 2015. "Quasi-experimental evidence on the relation between child care subsidies and child care quality," CPB Discussion Paper 310, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    20. van Huizen, Thomas & Plantenga, Janneke, 2018. "Do children benefit from universal early childhood education and care? A meta-analysis of evidence from natural experiments," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 206-222.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Day care; family policy measures; child outcomes;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • I22 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Educational Finance; Financial Aid
    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:83-1-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.