IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v13y2025a10222.html

Generative AI‐Making and State‐Making: Sovereign AI Race and the Future of Digital Geopolitics

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenyu Wang

    (Journalism Institute, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, China)

Abstract

This article examines how intensifying global competition for sovereign AI, fueled by the rise of generative AI, is reshaping state capacity and digital geopolitics. Drawing on classical theories of state formation, this research introduces the Generative AI-Making and State-Making framework and applies it to four cases—the US, France, Brazil, and Singapore. The analysis shows that strategic pressures from the sovereign AI race compel nation-states to enter a new phase of state-building. Key findings reveal that the intensity of these state-building efforts is directly driven by elites’ perceptions of transboundary competition: the sharper the perceived rivalry, the greater the strategic investment in strengthening coercive, extractive, delivery, and informational capacities. Although states converge in their efforts to augment these capacities, their objectives and methods diverge depending on international position, geopolitical context, and domestic endowments. As a result, the sovereign AI race is not merely a technological contest but also a powerful force reshaping domestic state structures and international power dynamics. It contributes to a more complex geopolitical landscape marked by US–China bipolarity alongside the rise of regional technological powers. By tracing how governments leverage AI to reinforce capacity, this study provides a theoretically grounded perspective on the evolving nature of geopolitical competition in the AI era.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenyu Wang, 2025. "Generative AI‐Making and State‐Making: Sovereign AI Race and the Future of Digital Geopolitics," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:10222
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.10222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10222
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.10222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bresnahan, Timothy F. & Trajtenberg, M., 1995. "General purpose technologies 'Engines of growth'?," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 83-108, January.
    2. Keohane, Robert O., 1969. "Lilliputians' Dilemmas: Small States in Internatinal Politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 291-310, April.
    3. Mariana Mazzucato, 2018. "Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 803-815.
    4. Timothy Besley & Torsten Persson, 2009. "The Origins of State Capacity: Property Rights, Taxation, and Politics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1218-1244, September.
    5. Linda Weiss & Elizabeth Thurbon, 2021. "Developmental State or Economic Statecraft? Where, Why and How the Difference Matters," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 472-489, May.
    6. Roxana Radu, 2021. "Steering the governance of artificial intelligence: national strategies in perspective [AI ethics guidelines inventory]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(2), pages 178-193.
    7. Martin Holicka & Tara Vinodrai, 2022. "The global geography of investment in emerging technologies: the case of blockchain firms," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 177-179, December.
    8. Stylianos Ioannis Tzagkarakis & Dimitrios Kritas, 2023. "Mixed research methods in political science and governance: approaches and applications," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 39-53, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alje van Dam & Koen Frenken, 2020. "Vertical vs. Horizontal Policy in a Capabilities Model of Economic Development," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2037, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2020.
    2. Grashof, Nils, 2020. "Putting the watering can away Towards a targeted (problem-oriented) cluster policy framework," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/4, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    3. Antonin BERGEAUD & Gilbert Cette & Rémy Lecat, 2017. "What role did education, equipment age and technology play in 20th century productivity growth?," Rue de la Banque, Banque de France, issue 43, may..
    4. Patricia Crifo & Etienne Lehmann, 2001. "Why the Kuznets Curve Will Always Reverse," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00150324, HAL.
    5. Dinko Herman BOIKANYO, 2024. "Utilization Of 4ir Technologies To Enhance Strategic Intelligence And Dynamic Capabilities For A Sustainable Competitive Advantage," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 5-24, March.
    6. Szalavetz, Andrea, 2002. "Az informatikai szektor és a felzárkózó gazdaságok [The informatics sector and the advancing economies]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 794-804.
    7. Gilles Saint‐Paul & Davide Ticchi & Andrea Vindigni, 2016. "A Theory of Political Entrenchment," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(593), pages 1238-1263, June.
    8. Kenneth P Seastedt & Patrick Schwab & Zach O’Brien & Edith Wakida & Karen Herrera & Portia Grace F Marcelo & Louis Agha-Mir-Salim & Xavier Borrat Frigola & Emily Boardman Ndulue & Alvin Marcelo & Leo , 2022. "Global healthcare fairness: We should be sharing more, not less, data," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(10), pages 1-13, October.
    9. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-205.
    10. Antonelli, Cristiano, 2017. "Digital knowledge generation and the appropriability trade-off," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 991-1002.
    11. Cuberes, David & Mountford, Andrew, 2012. "Fiscal policy institutions and history," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 115(3), pages 392-395.
    12. Aghion, Philippe & Akcigit, Ufuk & Howitt, Peter, 2014. "What Do We Learn From Schumpeterian Growth Theory?," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 515-563, Elsevier.
    13. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    14. Ademuyiwa A. Lawal, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Innovative Automobile Policy on Employment in Nigeria and China," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(09), pages 679-686, September.
    15. Ghisetti, Claudia, 2017. "Demand-pull and environmental innovations: Estimating the effects of innovative public procurement," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 178-187.
    16. Battke, Benedikt & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Stollenwerk, Stephan & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2016. "Internal or external spillovers—Which kind of knowledge is more likely to flow within or across technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 27-41.
    17. P. Guerrieri & M. Luciani & V. Meliciani, 2011. "The determinants of investment in information and communication technologies," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 387-403.
    18. repec:dgr:rugggd:gd-79 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Markey-Towler, Brendan & Novak, Mikayla & Potts, Jason, 2020. "Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    20. Fatica, Serena, 2009. "Taxation and the quality of institutions: asymmetric effects on FDI," MPRA Paper 24179, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jun 2010.
    21. Henrik Jacobsen Kleven & Claus Thustrup Kreiner & Emmanuel Saez, 2016. "Why Can Modern Governments Tax So Much? An Agency Model of Firms as Fiscal Intermediaries," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 83(330), pages 219-246, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:10222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.