IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v57y2004i05p5-19.html

Ist die Abschaffung der Entfernungspauschale ökonomisch sinnvoll?

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfram F. Richter
  • Peter Bareis
  • Matthias Wrede
  • Martin Gasche

Abstract

In der Diskussion um die Abschaffung von Steuervergünstigungen wird regelmäßig die Streichung bzw. die Reduzierung der Entfernungspauschale angeführt. Prof. Dr. Wolfram F. Richter, Universität Dortmund, verlangt in diesem Zusammenhang die generelle Überprüfung des Werbekostenbegriffs und des Kriteriums der beruflichen Veranlassung. Auch für Prof. Dr. Peter Bareis, Universität Stuttgart-Hohenheim, ist das derzeitige geltende Gesetz nicht sinnvoll: »Es sollte so geändert werden, wie dies ansatzweise bereits die Einkommensteuer-Kommission 1994 vorgeschlagen hatte, die eine Begrenzung auf die durchschnittlichen Kosten des öffentlichen Personennahverkehrs vorgeschlagen hatte. Ergänzt werden sollte dies durch die Unterstellung einer etwa hälftigen privaten Veranlassung, ggf. sogar durch eine Degression der Abzugsbeträge in Abhängigkeit von der Entfernung.« Prof. Dr. Matthias Wrede, RWTH Aachen, plädiert ebenfalls für eine Kürzung der Entfernungspauschale, die seiner Meinung nach »effizient und gerecht« sei. Die Aufwendungen des Arbeitnehmers für Fahrten zwischen Wohnung und Arbeitsstätte sollten pauschal »zu einem unter den internen Grenzkosten liegenden Satz abgegolten werden«. Dagegen wendet sich Dr. Martin Gasche, Mitarbeiter im Stab des Sachverständigenrates, gegen eine weitere Reduktion oder gar eine Abschaffung der Entfernungspauschalen.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfram F. Richter & Peter Bareis & Matthias Wrede & Martin Gasche, 2004. "Ist die Abschaffung der Entfernungspauschale ökonomisch sinnvoll?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 57(05), pages 5-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:57:y:2004:i:05:p:5-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2004_5_2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wrede, Matthias, 2001. "Should Commuting Expenses Be Tax Deductible? A Welfare Analysis," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 80-99, January.
    2. Diamond, Peter A & Mirrlees, James A, 1971. "Optimal Taxation and Public Production II: Tax Rules," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(3), pages 261-278, June.
    3. Diamond, Peter A & Mirrlees, James A, 1971. "Optimal Taxation and Public Production: I--Production Efficiency," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 8-27, March.
    4. Matthias Wrede, 2003. "Tax Deductibility of Commuting Expenses and Residential Land Use with more than one Center," CESifo Working Paper Series 972, CESifo.
    5. Matthias Wrede, 2001. "Tax Deductibility of Commuting Expenses and Leisures: On the Tax Treatment of Time-Saving Expenditure," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 57(2), pages 216-224, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hirte, Georg & Tscharaktschiew, Stefan, 2013. "Income tax deduction of commuting expenses in an urban CGE study: The case of German cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 11-27.
    2. Hirte, Georg & Tscharaktschiew, Stefan, 2011. "Income tax deduction of commuting expenses and tax funding in an urban CGE study: the case of German cities," Dresden Discussion Paper Series in Economics 02/11, Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Economics.
    3. Frondel, Manuel, 2019. "CO₂-Bepreisung in den nicht in den Emissionshandel integrierten Sektoren: Optionen für eine sozial ausgewogene Ausgestaltung," RWI Materialien 130, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
    4. Heuermann, Daniel F. & Assmann, Franziska & vom Berge, Philipp & Freund, Florian, 2017. "The distributional effect of commuting subsidies - Evidence from geo-referenced data and a large-scale policy reform," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 11-24.
    5. Frondel, Manuel & Helmers, Viola & Mattauch, Linus & Pahle, Michael & Sommer, Stephan & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2021. "Akzeptanz der CO₂-Bepreisung in Deutschland: Evidenz für private Haushalte vor Einführung des CO₂-Preises," RWI Materialien 147, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wolfram Richter, 2006. "Efficiency effects of tax deductions for work-related expenses," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 13(6), pages 685-699, November.
    2. Borck, Rainald & Wrede, Matthias, 2005. "Political economy of commuting subsidies," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 478-499, May.
    3. Baumgart, Eike & Blaufus, Kay & Hechtner, Frank, 2023. "The tax treatment of commuting expenses and job-related mobility," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 280, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    4. Homburg, Stefan, 2008. "Die Entfernungspauschale als steuertheoretische Herausforderung," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 45-53.
    5. Alejandro Esteller & Amedeo Piolatto & Matthew D. Rablen, 2016. "Taxing high-income earners: tax avoidance and mobility," IFS Working Papers W16/07, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. Selim, Sheikh, 2006. "On Policy Relevance of Ramsey Tax Rules," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2006/19, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section, revised Jul 2006.
    7. Ligthart, J.E., 2004. "Consumption Taxation in a Digital World : A Primer," Discussion Paper 2004-102, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    8. Alan J. Auerbach, 2006. "The Future of Capital Income Taxation," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 27(4), pages 399-420, December.
    9. Ceyhun Elgin & Orhan Torul & Tugce Turk, 2022. "Marginal Cost of Public Funds under the Presence of Informality," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 241(2), pages 79-103, June.
    10. Paweł Doligalski & Piotr Dworczak & Joanna Krysta & Filip Tokarski, 2025. "Incentive Separability," Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(3), pages 539-567.
    11. Börjesson, Maria & Asplund, Disa & Hamilton, Carl, 2021. "Optimal kilometre tax for electric passenger cars," Working Papers 2021:3, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).
    12. Tim Besley & Rohini Pande, 1998. "Read my lips: the political economy of information transmission," IFS Working Papers W98/13, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    13. Laffont, Jean-Jacques, 2002. "Public economics yesterday, today and tomorrow," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 327-334, December.
    14. Richard Musgrave, 1996. "The role of the state in fiscal theory," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 3(3), pages 247-258, July.
    15. Yoshitsugu Kanemoto, 2011. "Surplus Theory," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Keuschnigg, Christian & Loretz, Simon & Winner, Hannes, 2014. "Tax Competition and Tax Coordination in the European Union: A Survey," Economics Working Paper Series 1427, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    17. Juan Pablo Gama & Rodrigo J. Raad, 2023. "Large public expenditure shocks in a Ramsey taxation model with default," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG 665, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    18. Alberto Petrucci, 2007. "Optimal Taxation of Capital Income in Models with Endogenous Fertility," Development Working Papers 228, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano.
    19. Richter, Wolfram F., 2009. "Taxing education in Ramsey's tradition," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(11-12), pages 1254-1260, December.
    20. Takuya Obara & Yoshitomo Ogawa, 2024. "Optimal taxation in an endogenous fertility model with non-cooperative behavior," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 173-197, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:57:y:2004:i:05:p:5-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.