IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/brc/journl/v51y2021i1p151-160.html

Debtors' Perception Of Interest Rates Charged By Banks During The Covid-19 Pandemic. Case Study - Debtors From Cä‚Lä‚Raè˜I County

Author

Listed:
  • Florentina Moisescu

    (University Dunărea de Jos of Galaţi, Romania)

  • Nechita Daniela

    (University Dunărea de Jos of Galaţi, Romania)

  • Răgălie ConstanÈ›a

    (University Dunărea de Jos of Galaţi, Romania)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a strong impact on all states globally. As a result, many people who had ongoing loan agreements lost their jobs and became unable to pay their debts to banks. Noticing these problems in different markets, the banking units changed their strategy and offered debtors the opportunity not to pay the instalments for a certain period of time, until they obtained the financial resources they needed. All this has led in time to the change in interest rates charged to banks. The objective of this paper is to determine the debtors' perception of the facilities offered by banks during this period as well as the interest rates charged by them. In order to fulfil the purpose of this paper, we conducted a quantitative study among debtors in Calarasi County. The research took place between 26.05.2020 - 15.06.2020, on a sample of 140 respondents. A questionnaire was used to collect the data and was posted on online platform Marketing4Today, using the Drag & Drop Editor. The study found that some respondents are not satisfied with the interest rates charged by banks, considering that the facilities offered during the COVID-19 pandemic have the role of supporting their interests more and less those of borrowers. In addition, due to labour market problems, they expect to intensify credit policy measures which would automatically lead to a reduction in demand for credit.

Suggested Citation

  • Florentina Moisescu & Nechita Daniela & Răgălie ConstanÈ›a, 2021. "Debtors' Perception Of Interest Rates Charged By Banks During The Covid-19 Pandemic. Case Study - Debtors From Cä‚Lä‚Raè˜I County," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 51(1), pages 151-160.
    • Handle: RePEc:brc:journl:v:51:y:2021:i:1:p:151-160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.strategiimanageriale.ro/papers/210105.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iacob C?toiu & C?lin Veghe?, 2009. "Marketing competencies of trade personnel," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(25), pages 29-40, February.
    2. Lay, Sok Heng, 2020. "Bank credit and economic growth: Short-run evidence from a dynamic threshold panel model," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Klapper, Leora & Laeven, Luc & Rajan, Raghuram, 2006. "Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 591-629, December.
    4. Goodell, John W., 2020. "COVID-19 and finance: Agendas for future research," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evila Piva & Massimiliano Guerini, 2023. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and pandemic-related policies on new firm creation: an analysis of the Italian case," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 1009-1031, March.
    2. Rakesh Sambharya & Martina Musteen, 2014. "Institutional environment and entrepreneurship: An empirical study across countries," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 314-330, December.
    3. Oznur Ozdamar & Eleftherios Giovanis & Sahizer Samuk, 2020. "State business relations and the dynamics of job flows in Egypt and Turkey," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 10(4), pages 519-558, December.
    4. Gustavo Henrique de Andrade & Miriam Bruhn & David McKenzie, 2016. "A Helping Hand or the Long Arm of the Law? Experimental Evidence on What Governments Can Do to Formalize Firms," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 30(1), pages 24-54.
    5. Miguel García-Posada & Juan Mora-Sanguinetti, 2015. "Entrepreneurship and enforcement institutions: disaggregated evidence for Spain," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 49-74, August.
    6. Ufuk Akcigit & Sina T. Ates, 2023. "What Happened to US Business Dynamism?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 131(8), pages 2059-2124.
    7. Bouteska, Ahmed & Sharif, Taimur & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul, 2023. "COVID-19 and stock returns: Evidence from the Markov switching dependence approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Florentina Melnic & Daniel Juravle, 2020. "Governance And Access To Finance," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 25, pages 151-168, June.
    9. Heyden, Kim J. & Heyden, Thomas, 2021. "Market reactions to the arrival and containment of COVID-19: An event study," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    10. Goodell, John W. & Goutte, Stephane, 2021. "Co-movement of COVID-19 and Bitcoin: Evidence from wavelet coherence analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    11. Fabiano Schivardi & Eliana Viviano, 2007. "Entry barriers in Italian retail trade," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 616, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    12. Andrew Isaak & Baris Istipliler & Suleika Bort & Michael Woywode, 2025. "Regulation, Corruption, and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations: Insights from Bitcoin Trading and Platform Founding Between 2011 and 2023," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 2210-2244, November.
    13. Hongjun Zeng & Abdullahi D. Ahmed, 2026. "Dependency structure and volatility connectedness among China-ASEAN stock market, cryptocurrencies, and crude oil," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 1-39, December.
    14. Luis Medrano-Adán & Vicente Salas-Fumás & J. Sanchez-Asin, 2015. "Heterogeneous entrepreneurs from occupational choices in economies with minimum wages," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 597-619, March.
    15. Jiang, Jie & Hou, Jack & Wang, Cangyu & Liu, HaiYue, 2021. "COVID-19 impact on firm investment—Evidence from Chinese publicly listed firms," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    16. Brada, Josef C. & Gajewski, Paweł & Kutan, Ali M., 2021. "Economic resiliency and recovery, lessons from the financial crisis for the COVID-19 pandemic: A regional perspective from Central and Eastern Europe," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    17. Da Rin, Marco & Di Giacomo, Marina & Sembenelli, Alessandro, 2011. "Entrepreneurship, firm entry, and the taxation of corporate income: Evidence from Europe," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 1048-1066.
    18. Chen, Xilu & Ge, Erqi & Xu, Xianxiang & Zhou, Quan, 2025. "Does digitalization of government activities improve business environment? The influence of public service standardization," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 533-560.
    19. Pagano, Michael S. & Sedunov, John & Velthuis, Raisa, 2021. "How did retail investors respond to the COVID-19 pandemic? The effect of Robinhood brokerage customers on market quality," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    20. Ashok, Shruti & Corbet, Shaen & Dhingra, Deepika & Goodell, John W. & Kumar, Satish & Yadav, Miklesh Prasad, 2022. "Are energy markets informationally smarter than equity markets? Evidence from the COVID-19 experience," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PB).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brc:journl:v:51:y:2021:i:1:p:151-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan MICUDA (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.univcb.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.