IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jindec/v71y2023i3p770-813.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profitability of Noisy Certification in the Presence of Loss Averse Buyers

Author

Listed:
  • Seung Huh
  • Dmitry A. Shapiro
  • Sung H. Ham

Abstract

We study how the inaccuracy of a costly certification technology affects a monopolistic seller's profitability. We compare three scenarios: no certification, a 100% accurate certification, and a 50% accurate certification that produces accurate evaluations half the time. The noisy certification environment is never the most profitable and, depending on the buyers' loss aversion, can be the least profitable. However, a noisy certification can be more profitable than an accurate one, as it discourages the over‐certification that occurs in an accurate certification environment. Experimentally, the noisy certification is shown to be the least profitable treatment, whereas the accurate certification is shown to be the most profitable.

Suggested Citation

  • Seung Huh & Dmitry A. Shapiro & Sung H. Ham, 2023. "Profitability of Noisy Certification in the Presence of Loss Averse Buyers," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 770-813, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jindec:v:71:y:2023:i:3:p:770-813
    DOI: 10.1111/joie.12334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12334
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joie.12334?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jindec:v:71:y:2023:i:3:p:770-813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-1821 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.