IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2509.04146.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Noisy Certification in a Duopolistic Setting with Loss-Averse Buyers

Author

Listed:
  • Dmitry Shapiro
  • Tri Phu Vu

Abstract

This paper studies how noise in certification technology affects seller profits in a duopoly with unobservable product quality. We identify two opposing effects of noisy certification. First, it reduces the informativeness of certification outcomes, homogenizing buyers' beliefs and limiting the scope for vertical differentiation. Second, it introduces randomness into buyer perceptions, endogenously generating differentiation between otherwise similar products. When buyers are risk-neutral, the first effect dominates, reducing seller profits. However, when buyers are loss averse, the negative impact of reduced informativeness is mitigated, and noisy certification can increase profits relative to accurate certification. Experimentally, treatments with inaccurate certification are more profitable than those with accurate certification, particularly in settings with intense competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Dmitry Shapiro & Tri Phu Vu, 2025. "Noisy Certification in a Duopolistic Setting with Loss-Averse Buyers," Papers 2509.04146, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2509.04146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.04146
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2509.04146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.