IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v28y2021i3p1152-1176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trapped within ideological wars: Femininities in a Muslim society and the contest of women as leaders

Author

Listed:
  • Fitri Hariana Oktaviani
  • Bernard McKenna
  • Terrance Fitzsimmons

Abstract

This paper analyzes the discursive contestation among online news media about women in leadership roles within a Muslim majority society, Indonesia. Indonesian women have established a substantial leadership role in which the “ideal” modern woman has been the image of “wanita karir,” a commingling of various Indonesian feminist discourses and Western (post)feminist discursive formations. Despite the progress, women's leadership in Indonesia has recently been challenged by reactionary Islamist forces. Using a critical poststructural discourse perspective, we identify a range of four forms of femininity and female leadership in Indonesian online media that reside at the intersections of competing discourses. This paper offers two areas of contributions. First, we identify the leadership challenges faced by women in a South‐East Asian context, in particular within a democratic Muslim society like Indonesia. Second, we contribute to the theorization of women's leadership challenges from the perspective of femininity construction. In particular, we want to emphasize the notion of the multiplicity of discourses in shaping femininities. In doing so, we demonstrate the permutability, transformability, and adaptability of gender discrimination in our identified forms of femininity, and the limitations of the virtuous burden imposed by apparently supportive discourse.

Suggested Citation

  • Fitri Hariana Oktaviani & Bernard McKenna & Terrance Fitzsimmons, 2021. "Trapped within ideological wars: Femininities in a Muslim society and the contest of women as leaders," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 1152-1176, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:3:p:1152-1176
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12662
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12662?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jawad Syed & Faiza Ali, 2019. "Theorizing equal opportunity in Muslim majority countries," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(11), pages 1621-1639, November.
    2. Bernard McKenna & Martie-Louise Verreynne & Neal Waddell, 2016. "Locating gendered work practices: a typology," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(6), pages 1085-1107, September.
    3. Lisa Cameron & Diana Contreras Suarez & William Rowell, 2019. "Female Labour Force Participation in Indonesia: Why Has it Stalled?," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 157-192, May.
    4. Elisa, 2014. "Loss & Damage: a Critical Discourse Analysis," Working Papers 2014.84, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    5. Honohan, Patrick, 2016. "Debt and austerity: Post-crisis lessons from Ireland," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 149-157.
    6. Barbara Czarniawska & Carl Rhodes, 2006. "Strong Plots: Popular Culture in Management Practice and Theory," Chapters, in: Pasquale Gagliardi & Barbara Czarniawska (ed.), Management Education and Humanities, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Yvonne Benschop & Patricia Lewis & Ruth Simpson & Maria Adamson, 2017. "Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and A ‘Successfully’ Balanced Femininity in Celebrity CEO Autobiographies," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 314-327, May.
    8. Yvonne Benschop & Patricia Lewis & Ruth Simpson & Rosalind Gill & Elisabeth K. Kelan & Christina M. Scharff, 2017. "A Postfeminist Sensibility at Work," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 226-244, May.
    9. Elisabeth K. Kelan, 2008. "The Discursive Construction of Gender in Contemporary Management Literature," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 427-445, August.
    10. Ruth Weatherall, 2020. "Even when those struggles are not our own: Storytelling and solidarity in a feminist social justice organization," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 471-486, July.
    11. Patricia Lewis & Ruth Simpson, 2017. "Hakim Revisited: Preference, Choice and the Postfeminist Gender Regime," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 115-133, March.
    12. Haridimos Tsoukas, 2009. "A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(6), pages 941-957, December.
    13. Memoona Tariq & Jawad Syed, 2018. "An intersectional perspective on Muslim women's issues and experiences in employment," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(5), pages 495-513, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lakshmi Balachandran Nair, 2024. "Mrs. Dalloway and the Shecession: The Interconnectedness and Intersectionalities of Care Ethics and Social Time During the Pandemic," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(1), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ea Høg Utoft, 2021. "Maneuvering within postfeminism: A study of gender equality practitioners in Danish academia," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 301-317, January.
    2. Shelly Ronen, 2018. "The postfeminist ideology at work: Endorsing gender essentialism and denying feminine devaluation in the case of design work," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(5), pages 514-530, September.
    3. Grace Gao & Linna Sai, 2020. "Towards a ‘virtual’ world: Social isolation and struggles during the COVID‐19 pandemic as single women living alone," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 754-762, September.
    4. Helen Delaney & Katie R. Sullivan, 2021. "The political is personal: Postfeminism and the construction of the ideal working mother," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 1697-1710, July.
    5. Anna Alexandersson & Viktorija Kalonaityte, 2021. "Girl bosses, punk poodles, and pink smoothies: Girlhood as Enterprising Femininity," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 416-438, January.
    6. Kate Kenny, 2024. "Feminist social movements and whistleblowing disclosures: Ireland's Women of Honour," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 961-982, May.
    7. Anders Melander & Tomas Mullern & David Anderssson & Fredrik Elgh & Malin Löfving, 2022. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap in Collaborative Research—in Dialogues We Trust," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 655-677, October.
    8. Lorino, Philippe & Mourey, Damien & Schmidt, Géraldine, 2017. "Goffman's theory of frames and situated meaning-making in performance reviews. The case of a category management approach in the French retail sector," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 32-49.
    9. Hervé Dumez & Etienne Minvielle, 2020. "Le système hospitalier français dans la crise Covid-19," Working Papers hal-03053359, HAL.
    10. Brunswicker, Sabine & Bilgram, Volker & Fueller, Johann, 2017. "Taming wicked civic challenges with an innovative crowd," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 167-177.
    11. Kreiner, Kristian & Jacobsen, Peter Holm & Jensen, Daniel Toft, 2011. "Dialogues and the problems of knowing: Reinventing the architectural competition," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 160-166, March.
    12. Rhea Ashley Hoskin & Lilith A. Whiley, 2023. "Femme‐toring: Leveraging critical femininities and femme theory to cultivate alternative approaches to mentoring," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1317-1333, July.
    13. Armisen, Albert & Majchrzak, Ann, 2015. "Tapping the innovative business potential of innovation contests," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 389-399.
    14. Anna Jonsson & Maria Grafström & Mikael Klintman, 2022. "Unboxing knowledge in collaboration between academia and society: A story about conceptions and epistemic uncertainty [De-essentializing the Knowledge Intensive Firm: Reflections on Skeptical Resea," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 583-597.
    15. Elena Tavella & L. Alberto Franco, 2015. "Dynamics of Group Knowledge Production in Facilitated Modelling Workshops: An Exploratory Study," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 451-475, May.
    16. Paola Perez-Aleman, 2011. "Collective Learning in Global Diffusion: Spreading Quality Standards in a Developing Country Cluster," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 173-189, February.
    17. Sophia Belghiti-Mahut & Anne-Laurence Lafont & Angélique Rodhain & Florence Rodhain & Leila Temri & Ouidad Yousfi, 2016. "Genre et innovateur frugal : 4 cas de femmes innovatrices," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 69-93.
    18. Tarek Abdelfattah & Mohamed Elmahgoub & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2021. "Female Audit Partners and Extended Audit Reporting: UK Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 177-197, November.
    19. Sarah Hudson & Helena V. González-Gómez & Cyrlene Claasen, 2022. "Societal Inequality, Corruption and Relation-Based Inequality in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 789-809, December.
    20. Charles Barthold & Victor Krawczyk & Marco Berti & Vincenza Priola, 2022. "Intersectionality on screen. A coloniality perspective to understand popular culture representations of intersecting oppressions at work," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 1890-1909, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:3:p:1152-1176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.