IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v42y2024i3ne12770.html

Monetary incentives to improve tax compliance: A Brazilian case study

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Luis Tonetto
  • Adelar Fochezatto
  • Josep Miquel Pique

Abstract

Motivation To enhance tax education and increase citizen participation in combatting tax evasion, monetary incentives may be used. In December (2021), the state government of Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil launched the Receita Certa project. It aims to encourage new taxpayer habits, by refunding part of the tax collected by retailers on consumption back to citizens, contingent on its performance exceeding inflation rates. Taxpayers add their tax identification to receipts and request redemption every three months. Purpose We analyse the impact of the Receita Certa project on the behaviour of consumers as taxpayers. Methods We evaluate the impacts of Receita Certa using difference‐in‐differences. The response variables are the monthly number and value of electronic receipts issued to beneficiaries. The treatment group consists of citizens eligible for the refund in its introduction month, while the remainder constitute the control group. The database includes receipts issued to 3.4 million taxpayers who added their tax identification to the receipt — spanning 11 months before and 18 months after the initiative, began resulting in 46.7 million records. Findings The Receita Certa proved ineffective, as it led to fewer tax documents issued. Distributing resources widely to many users does not seem the best solution, both in cost and results. Distribution goes first and foremost to people on higher incomes since they got larger prizes: the smaller prizes of people on lower incomes were often not claimed. The programme made tax more regressive. The programme was also costly. Policy implications States that have a large tax gap need to improve their control systems. Initiatives like the Receita Certa that return resources widely to taxpayers to reduce tax evasion are widespread. Given the results shown, Receita Certa needs rethinking.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Luis Tonetto & Adelar Fochezatto & Josep Miquel Pique, 2024. "Monetary incentives to improve tax compliance: A Brazilian case study," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 42(3), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:42:y:2024:i:3:n:e12770
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12770
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bird, Richard, 2010. "Smart Tax Administration," World Bank - Economic Premise, The World Bank, issue 36, pages 1-5, October.
    2. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Fabbri, Marco, 2015. "Shaping tax norms through lotteries," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 8-15.
    4. Bonner, Sarah E. & Sprinkle, Geoffrey B., 2002. "The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: theories, evidence, and a framework for research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(4-5), pages 303-345.
    5. Joana Naritomi, 2019. "Consumers as Tax Auditors," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(9), pages 3031-3072, September.
    6. Joshua D. Angrist & Jörn-Steffen Pischke, 2009. "Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 8769, December.
    7. Carla Marchese, 2009. "Rewarding the Consumer for Curbing the Evasion of Commodity Taxes?," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 65(4), pages 383-402, December.
    8. Kachelmeier, Steven J & Shehata, Mohamed, 1992. "Examining Risk Preferences under High Monetary Incentives: Experimental Evidence from the People's Republic of China," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(5), pages 1120-1141, December.
    9. Marianne Bertrand & Esther Duflo & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2004. "How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 119(1), pages 249-275.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jorge Luis Tonetto & Josep Miquel Pique & Carina Rapetti & Adelar Fochezatto, 2025. "Municipal Fiscal Sustainability in the Face of Climate Disasters: An Analysis of the 2024 Floods in Southern Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Jorge Luis Tonetto & Adelar Fochezatto & Josep Miquel Pique & Carina Rapetti, 2025. "Instant lottery innovation, tax compliance and herd effects, an impact assessment in Brazil," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(3), pages 609-633, September.
    3. Tonetto, Jorge Luis & Fochezatto, Adelar & Pique, Josep Miquel & Rapetti, Carina, 2026. "Behavioral engagement and fiscal incentive design: time series evidence from southern Brazil," MPRA Paper 128174, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge Luis Tonetto & Adelar Fochezatto & Josep Miquel Pique & Carina Rapetti, 2025. "Instant lottery innovation, tax compliance and herd effects, an impact assessment in Brazil," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(3), pages 609-633, September.
    2. Tonetto, Jorge Luis & Fochezatto, Adelar & Pique, Josep Miquel & Rapetti, Carina, 2026. "Behavioral engagement and fiscal incentive design: time series evidence from southern Brazil," MPRA Paper 128174, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Joana Naritomi, 2019. "Consumers as Tax Auditors," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(9), pages 3031-3072, September.
    4. Mutlu, Asli & Roy, Debraj & Filatova, Tatiana, 2023. "Capitalized value of evolving flood risks discount and nature-based solution premiums on property prices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    5. Li, Dongxu & Li, Xinqi & Zou, Ruiyang, 2026. "Compromised employee attention: Overnight returns and labor productivity," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. Nathalie Etchart-Vincent, 2007. "Expérimentation de laboratoire et économie : contre quelques idées reçues et faux problèmes," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 83(1), pages 91-116.
    7. Ying Ke & Yueqi Wen & Lili Teng, 2025. "Chain Leader Policy and Corporate Environmental Sustainability: A Multi-Level Analysis of Greenwashing Mitigation Mechanisms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-45, October.
    8. Wright, Austin L. & Sonin, Konstantin & Driscoll, Jesse & Wilson, Jarnickae, 2020. "Poverty and economic dislocation reduce compliance with COVID-19 shelter-in-place protocols," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 544-554.
    9. Matthew Chao & Ian Larkin, 2022. "Regulating Conflicts of Interest in Medicine Through Public Disclosure: Evidence from a Physician Payments Sunshine Law," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1078-1094, February.
    10. Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C. & Zhao, Jun, 2020. "Doubly robust difference-in-differences estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 101-122.
    11. Pilny, Adam & Wübker, Ansgar & Ziebarth, Nicolas R., 2017. "Introducing risk adjustment and free health plan choice in employer-based health insurance: Evidence from Germany," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 330-351.
    12. Joshua D. Angrist & Jörn-Steffen Pischke, 2017. "Undergraduate Econometrics Instruction: Through Our Classes, Darkly," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 125-144, Spring.
    13. Karbownik, Krzysztof, 2020. "The effects of student composition on teacher turnover: Evidence from an admission reform," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    14. Hendrik Wilhelm & Norbert Steigenberger & Clarissa E. Weber & Jouni K. Juntunen & Mark Ebers, 2024. "(No) Time for Change: When and Why Entrepreneurs Act During Underperforming Fundraising Attempts," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1299-1321, July.
    15. Heinz Welsch, 2024. "Household Sector Carbon Pricing, Revenue Rebating, and Subjective Well-Being: A Dollar is not a Dollar," Working Papers V-444-24, University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics, revised Apr 2024.
    16. Brady P. Horn & Johanna Catherine Maclean & Michael R. Strain, 2017. "Do Minimum Wage Increases Influence Worker Health?," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(4), pages 1986-2007, October.
    17. Langen, Henrika & Laine, Liisa, 2025. "Heterogeneous Effects of a Teacher Strike on Education and Labor Market Outcomes," IZA Discussion Papers 17937, IZA Network @ LISER.
    18. Cain Polidano & Justin van de Ven & Sarah Voitchovsky, 2017. "The Power of Self-Interest: Effects of Education and Training Entitlements in Later-Life," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2017n12, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    19. Caballero, Julián, 2021. "Corporate dollar debt and depreciations: All’s well that ends well?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    20. Wang, Lisha & Pan, Minjie & Qian, Xinlei & Lv, Kangjuan, 2025. "Do specialized courts matter? Environmental judiciary and corporate emissions in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:42:y:2024:i:3:n:e12770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.