IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/brjirl/v63y2025i4p650-664.html

Non‐Standard Contingent Employment and Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Job Characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Ablaza
  • Arianna Gatta
  • Rose Stambe
  • Greg Marston

Abstract

Non‐standard contingent employment has become a hallmark of contemporary labour markets, raising widespread concerns regarding job quality and worker well‐being. Using job satisfaction as a proxy for well‐being, previous studies have generally observed lower levels of satisfaction among contingent workers relative to permanent workers. Substantial heterogeneity nevertheless exists, with self‐employed workers often reporting greater levels of satisfaction and casual and labour‐hire workers reporting lower levels of satisfaction. We revisit these findings and examine the role of job characteristics in explaining these results. Using data on a wide range of job attributes from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey, we show that contingent employment differs from permanent employment on several dimensions including flexibility and autonomy, skill use and job security. These differences explain previously observed gaps in job satisfaction, suggesting that job characteristics play a crucial mediating role in the relationship between contingent employment and worker well‐being.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Ablaza & Arianna Gatta & Rose Stambe & Greg Marston, 2025. "Non‐Standard Contingent Employment and Job Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Job Characteristics," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 650-664, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:63:y:2025:i:4:p:650-664
    DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12890
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/bjir.12890?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:63:y:2025:i:4:p:650-664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.