IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/brjirl/v29y1991i3p497-505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Aspects of Youth Employment and Training Policy: Reply

Author

Listed:
  • David Marsden
  • Paul Ryan

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • David Marsden & Paul Ryan, 1991. "Institutional Aspects of Youth Employment and Training Policy: Reply," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 29(3), pages 497-505, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:29:y:1991:i:3:p:497-505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1991.tb00257.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valerie Jarvis & S.J. Prais, 1989. "Two Nations of Shopkeepers: Training for Retailing in France and Britain," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 128(1), pages 58-74, May.
    2. Malcomson, James M, 1984. "Work Incentives, Hierarchy, and Internal Labor Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 92(3), pages 486-507, June.
    3. repec:sae:niesru:v:128:y::i:1:p:58-74 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Paul Ryan, 1991. "Trade Union Policies towards the Youth Training Scheme in Great Britain: the Arguments," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Paul Ryan & Paolo Garonna & Richard C. Edwards (ed.), The Problem of Youth, chapter 8, pages 234-273, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gospel, H., 1997. "The revival of apprenticeship training in Britain," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20302, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Howard Gospel, 1997. "The Revival of Apprenticeship Training in Britain," CEP Discussion Papers dp0372, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    3. Gospel, Howard & Foreman, Jim, 2002. "The provision of training in Britain: case studies of inter-firm coordination," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20055, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Paul Ryan, 2001. "The School-to-Work Transition: A Cross-National Perspective," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 39(1), pages 34-92, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William T. Dickens & Lawrence F. Katz & Kevin Lang & Lawrence H. Summers, 1987. "Employee Crime, Monitoring, and the Efficiency Wage Hypothesis," NBER Working Papers 2356, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Valerie Jarvis & S. J. Prais, 1997. "The Quality of Manufactured Products in Britain and Germany," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 421-438.
    3. Matthias Kräkel, 2002. "U-Type versus J-Type Tournaments," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 158(4), pages 614-637, December.
    4. Imhof, Lorens & Kräkel, Matthias, 2014. "Bonus pools and the informativeness principle," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 180-191.
    5. Steven G. Allen & Robert L. Clark, 1987. "Pensions and Firm Performance," NBER Working Papers 2266, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Bhaskar, V & Holden, Steinar, 2002. "Wage Differentiation via Subsidised General Training," Economics Discussion Papers 8851, University of Essex, Department of Economics.
    7. Joyee Deb & Jin Li & Arijit Mukherjee, 2015. "Relational Contracts with Subjective Peer Evaluations," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1995, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    8. Ola Kvaløy & Trond E. Olsen, 2006. "Team Incentives in Relational Employment Contracts," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 24(1), pages 139-170, January.
    9. Carolyn Pitchik, 2008. "Self-Promoting Investments," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 164(3), pages 381-406, September.
    10. Letina, Igor & Liu, Shuo & Netzer, Nick, 2020. "Delegating performance evaluation," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(2), May.
    11. Brunello, Giorgio & Ishikawa, Tsuneo, 1999. "Elite schools, high tech jobs and economic welfare," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 395-419, June.
    12. John List & Daan Van Soest & Jan Stoop & Haiwen Zhou, 2014. "On the Role of Group Size in Tournaments: Theory and Evidence from Lab and Field Experiments," NBER Working Papers 20008, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Andrej Angelovski & Tibor Neugebauer & Maroš Servatka, 2019. "Can Rank-Order Competition Resolve the Free-Rider Problem in the Voluntary Provision of Impure Public Goods? Experimental Evidence," Working Papers CESARE 1705, Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza, LUISS Guido Carli.
    14. Joseph A. Ritter & Lowell J. Taylor, 1997. "Economic models of employee motivation," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Sep, pages 3-21.
    15. Martin Gaynor, 1994. "Issues in the Industrial Organization of the Market for Physician Services," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(1), pages 211-255, March.
    16. Alan Benson & Danielle Li & Kelly Shue, 2019. "Promotions and the Peter Principle," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(4), pages 2085-2134.
    17. von Ledebur, Sidonia, 2006. "A Game Theoretic Analysis of the Conditions of Knowledge Transfer by New Employees in Companies," IWH Discussion Papers 3/2006, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    18. Matthias Kräkel, 2006. "Splitting Leagues," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 88(1), pages 21-48, June.
    19. Kandil, Magda, 1995. "Cyclical fluctuations across industries of the United States: Evidence and implications," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 17-37, February.
    20. MacLeod, W. Bentley & Urquiola, Miguel, 2020. "Why Does the U.S. Have the Best Research Universities? Incentives, Resources, and Virtuous Circles," IZA Discussion Papers 13203, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:29:y:1991:i:3:p:497-505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.