IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-46477-6488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Ineffectiveness of the Current Practice of Evaluating Lecturers’ Teaching in the Classroom by Administrators in Malaysia: A Conceptual Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Azfar Abdul Hamid

    (Academy of Language Studies, University Technology MARA (UiTM), Melaka, Malaysia)

  • Sheik Badrul Hisham Jamil Azhar

    (Academy of Language Studies, University Technology MARA (UiTM), Melaka, Malaysia)

  • Sheik Badrul Hisham Jamil Azhar

    (Academy of Language Studies, University Technology MARA (UiTM), Melaka, Malaysia)

  • Nur Aqilah Norwahi

    (Academy of Language Studies, University Technology MARA (UiTM), Melaka, Malaysia)

  • Nuramirah Zaini

    (Academy of Language Studies, University Technology MARA (UiTM), Melaka, Malaysia)

Abstract

The quality of teaching and learning in Malaysian higher education is crucial for developing an innovative, globally competitive workforce. However, the current practice of evaluating lecturers predominantly by administrators has come under growing scrutiny. This conceptual paper critically examines the ineffectiveness of administrator-led evaluations of teaching performance in Malaysian universities and other higher education institutions. Drawing on extant literature, policy documents, and theoretical frameworks, the paper highlights key challenges and proposes a more holistic and context-responsive approach to lecturer evaluation. By focusing on issues such as subjective bias, limited observational frequency, reliability and validity concerns, and the neglect of pedagogical innovation, the study underscores the shortcomings of relying heavily on administrative assessments. A conceptual framework is proposed, emphasizing multi-source feedback, peer collaboration, self-reflective practice, and technology-enhanced evaluation techniques. The paper recommends that policymakers and institutional leaders cultivate a culture of continuous professional development and empowering all stakeholders—administrators, lecturers, and students—to co-create robust evaluation strategies. Overall, this paper aims to stimulate informed discussion and foster a more effective evaluation system that accurately reflects teaching quality and fosters genuine pedagogical improvement in Malaysian higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Azfar Abdul Hamid & Sheik Badrul Hisham Jamil Azhar & Sheik Badrul Hisham Jamil Azhar & Nur Aqilah Norwahi & Nuramirah Zaini, 2025. "The Ineffectiveness of the Current Practice of Evaluating Lecturers’ Teaching in the Classroom by Administrators in Malaysia: A Conceptual Analysis," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 6477-6488, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-4:6477-6488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-4/6477-6488.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/the-ineffectiveness-of-the-current-practice-of-evaluating-lecturers-teaching-in-the-classroom-by-administrators-in-malaysia-a-conceptual-analysis/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boring, Anne, 2017. "Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 27-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Michelle Brock & Ralph De Haas, 2023. "Discriminatory Lending: Evidence from Bankers in the Lab," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 31-68, April.
    2. Ayllón, Sara, 2022. "Online teaching and gender bias," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Boring, Anne & Philippe, Arnaud, 2021. "Reducing discrimination in the field: Evidence from an awareness raising intervention targeting gender biases in student evaluations of teaching," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    4. Funk, Patricia & Iriberri, Nagore & Savio, Giulia, 2024. "Does scarcity of female instructors create demand for diversity among students? Evidence from an M-Turk experiment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Valerio Capraro & Hélène Barcelo, 2021. "Punishing defectors and rewarding cooperators: Do people discriminate between genders?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(1), pages 19-32, September.
    6. Hani Mansour & Daniel I. Rees & Bryson M. Rintala & Nathan N. Wozny, 2022. "The Effects of Professor Gender on the Postgraduation Outcomes of Female Students," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 75(3), pages 693-715, May.
    7. Lorenzo Ductor & Sanjeev Goyal & Anja Prummer, 2023. "Gender and Collaboration," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(6), pages 1366-1378, November.
    8. Kathleen D. Dyer & Dermot Donnelly-Hermosillo, 2024. "Student Ratings of Instruction: Updating Measures to Reflect Recent Scholarship," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 65(7), pages 1587-1613, November.
    9. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 535-566.
    10. Bonaccolto-Töpfer, Marina & Castagnetti, Carolina, 2021. "The COVID-19 pandemic: A threat to higher education?," Discussion Papers 117, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Chair of Labour and Regional Economics.
    11. Paredes, Valentina & Pino, Francisco J. & Díaz, David, 2024. "Does facial structure explain differences in student evaluations of teaching? The role of fWHR as a proxy for perceived dominance," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    12. Pierre Deschamps, 2024. "Gender Quotas in Hiring Committees: A Boon or a Bane for Women?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 7486-7505, November.
    13. Andreas Menzel & Christopher Woodruff, 2019. "Gender Wage Gaps and Worker Mobility: Evidence from the Garment Sector in Bangladesh," NBER Working Papers 25982, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Jeffrey Wagner, 2021. "Concrete Strategies for Economics Tenure-Track Faculty and Their Mentors," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 47(3), pages 449-459, June.
    15. Jouni Helin & Kristian Koerselman & Terhi Nokkala & Timo Tohmo & Jutta Viinikainen, 2019. "Equal Access to the Top? Measuring Selection into Finnish Academia," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 90-100.
    16. Coccorese, Paolo & Dell’Anno, Roberto & Restaino, Marialuisa, 2024. "Are outstanding researchers also top teachers? Exploring the link between research quality and teaching quality," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Arceo-Gomez, Eva O. & Campos-Vazquez, Raymundo M., 2022. "Gender Bias in Evaluation Processes," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    18. Shanthi Manian & Ketki Sheth, 2021. "Follow My Lead: Assertive Cheap Talk and the Gender Gap," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 6880-6896, November.
    19. Ductor, Lorenzo & Prummer, Anja, 2024. "Gender homophily, collaboration, and output," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 477-492.
    20. Kerstin Grosch & Stephan Müller & Holger A. Rau & Lilia Wasserka-Zhurakhovska, 2020. "Gender Differences in Dishonesty Disappear When Leaders Make Decisions on Behalf of Their Team," CESifo Working Paper Series 8514, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-4:6477-6488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.