IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/avo/emipdu/v26y2017i2p611-635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Development And Validation Of An Evaluation System For Patients’ Assessment Of Health Services

Author

Listed:
  • Teodor Pevec

    (General hospital Ptuj, Slovenia)

  • Aleksandra Pisnik

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Maribor, Slovenia)

Abstract

Background: In the service industry, perceived value is a concept of ever-increasing importance. It allows us to describe patients’ perceptions of health services in a significantly more complex manner. To measure patients’ perceptions of health services, we need a different measuring instrument, one that would take into account the multi-dimensional nature of perceived value. Purpose: the development and validation of a new instrument for measuring patient-reported outcomes after treatment. Methodology: the development of this instrument includes test construction, item reduction, validation, and the evaluation of its structure and internal consistency. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA) were used. Results: The results of Cronbach’s alpha for different constructs are: is 0.87 for Quality, 0.96 for Reputation, 0.83 for Perceived Value, 0.88 for Price, 0.89 for Satisfaction, and 0.90 for Loyalty. The values of other coefficients (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin, Bartlett in explained variance) are also adequately high. The final absolute fit indices are: chi-square 426.3, df=137, RMSEA=0.05, NFI=0.96, CFI=0.98. Conclusion: our measuring instrument is characterized by high reliability and validity for measuring outcomes after treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Teodor Pevec & Aleksandra Pisnik, 2017. "The Development And Validation Of An Evaluation System For Patients’ Assessment Of Health Services," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 26(2), pages 611-635, december.
  • Handle: RePEc:avo:emipdu:v:26:y:2017:i:2:p:611-635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/clanak/282084
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prem Shamdasani & Avinandan Mukherjee & Neeru Malhotra, 2008. "Antecedents and consequences of service quality in consumer evaluation of self-service internet technologies," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 117-138, January.
    2. Choi, Kui-Son & Cho, Woo-Hyun & Lee, Sunhee & Lee, Hanjoon & Kim, Chankon, 2004. "The relationships among quality, value, satisfaction and behavioral intention in health care provider choice: A South Korean study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(8), pages 913-921, August.
    3. Barnett R. Parker & V. Srinivasan, 1976. "A Consumer Preference Approach to the Planning of Rural Primary Health-Care Facilities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 991-1025, October.
    4. Hekkert, Karin Dorieke & Cihangir, Sezgin & Kleefstra, Sophia Martine & van den Berg, Bernard & Kool, Rudolf Bertijn, 2009. "Patient satisfaction revisited: A multilevel approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 68-75, July.
    5. Aleksandra Pisnik Korda & Boris Snoj, 2010. "Development, Validity and Reliability of Perceived Service Quality in Retail Banking and its Relationship With Perceived Value and Customer Satisfaction," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 8(2), pages 187-205.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ajimon George & Jobin Sahadevan, 2019. "A Conceptual Framework of Antecedents of Service Loyalty in Health Care: Patients’ Perspective," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 8(1), pages 50-59, January.
    2. Tatiana Dănescu & Ioan-Ovidiu Spătăcean & Maria-Alexandra Popa & Carmen-Gabriela Sîrbu, 2021. "The Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanism over Financial Performance: Evidence from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Young Hoon Lee & Yong Ho Choi, 2020. "Optimal cost adjustment for a selfish routing healthcare network," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 585-604, December.
    4. Lannes, Laurence, 2015. "Improving health worker performance: The patient-perspective from a PBF program in Rwanda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-11.
    5. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Mandakovic, Tomislav & Gupta, Sushil K. & Sahay, Sundeep & Hong, Sungwan, 1995. "A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 59-79, March.
    6. Dodds, Sarah & Bulmer, Sandy & Murphy, Andrew, 2014. "Consumer value in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) health care services," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 218-229.
    7. Stefan Meinzer & Johann Prenninger & Patrick Vesel & Johannes Kornhuber & Judith Volmer & Joachim Hornegger & Björn M. Eskofier, 2016. "Translating satisfaction determination from health care to the automotive industry," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 10(4), pages 651-685, December.
    8. Valdivieso Taborga, Carlos Eduardo, 2013. "Comparación de los modelos formativo, reflexivo y de antecedentes de evaluación estudiantil del servicio de docencia || Comparison of Formative, Reflective, and Antecedents Models of Students Evaluati," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 16(1), pages 95-120, December.
    9. Bereket Yakob & Busisiwe Purity Ncama, 2016. "Correlates of perceived access and implications for health system strengthening – lessons from HIV/AIDS treatment and care services in Ethiopia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    10. repec:eur:ejnmjr:64 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Laurentiu Mincu & Thorsten Gruber, 2013. "Exploring the Factors Influencing the Intention to Use Self-Service Technologies: An Eastern European Perspective," The International Journal of Economic Behavior - IJEB, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 3(1), pages 59-84, December.
    12. Nahla Ben Yekhlef Boukadida & Salah Boumaiza, 2015. "An exploratory study of Tourist-patient satisfaction and behavioral intentions in medical tourism: Post-hoc segmentation," Post-Print halshs-01253385, HAL.
    13. Turner, Frances & Merle, Aurélie & Gotteland, David, 2020. "Enhancing consumer value of the co-design experience in mass customization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 473-483.
    14. Ángel Fernández Pérez & Ángeles Sánchez Domínguez, 2017. "Los factores no clínicos como determinantes de la satisfacción con el sistema sanitario público en España," FEG Working Paper Series 01/17, Faculty of Economics and Business (University of Granada).
    15. Juhi Kamakoty & Sandeep Singh, 2023. "PHEISQUAL: A Scale to Measure Service Quality of Professional Higher Educational Institute From Faculty Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    16. Dr. Neelotpaul Banerjee & Santosh Sah, 2012. "A Comparative Study of Customers¡¯ Perceptions of Service Quality Dimensions between Public and Private Banks in India," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(5), pages 33-44, September.
    17. Ionica Oncioiu & Anca-Gabriela Petrescu & Florentina-Raluca Bîlcan & Marius Petrescu & Melinda Timea Fülöp & Dan Ioan Topor, 2020. "The Influence of Corporate Governance Systems on a Company’s Market Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Murante, Anna Maria & Vainieri, Milena & Rojas, Diana & Nuti, Sabina, 2014. "Does feedback influence patient - professional communication? Empirical evidence from Italy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 273-280.
    19. Milena Pavlova & Wim Groot & Godefridus Merode, 2005. "An Application of Rating Conjoint Analysis to Study the Importance of Quality-, Access- and Price-attributes to Health Care Consumers," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 267-286, September.
    20. Soheil Davari & Kemal Kilic & Gurdal Ertek, 2015. "Fuzzy bi-objective preventive health care network design," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 303-317, September.
    21. Hafiz Muhammad Naveed & Yao Hongxing & Muhammad Akhtar & Muhammad Usman Anwer & David Alemzero, 2020. "The Impact of Customer Feedback on Organizational Health when Employee Empowerment works as a moderator: Evidence from Pakistani Fast Food Industry," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 65-89, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    perceived value; satisfaction; quality; loyalty; reputation; price; health services; measuring instrument;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:avo:emipdu:v:26:y:2017:i:2:p:611-635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nebojsa Stojcic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oedubhr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.