IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apd/rper00/y2020i54id174.html

Procedimento metodológico para determinação de unidades espaciais de análise intra municipais: contribuição ao planejamento de transporte em municípios com abairramento indefinido

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Scabelo da Costa Pereira da Silva Lemos

    (Doutora em Ciências, Programa de Engenharia de Transporte, PET/ COPPE/ UFRJ, Pós-doutorado em Planejamento Urbano e Regional, IPPUR/ UFRJ)

  • Licínio da Silva Portugal

    (Professor Dr. do Programa de Engenharia de Transporte, PET/ COPPE/ UFRJ)

  • Ronaldo Balassiano

    (Professor PhD do Programa de Engenharia de Transporte, PET/ COPPE/ UFRJ)

Abstract

Objetiva-se elaborar e verificar a aplicação de metodologia para a definição de unidades espaciais de análise municipais e para a seleção de municípios da área de influência, partindo-se da premissa de três escalas espaciais de análise: intra regional, inter-regional e externa à região. Sua relevância está em equacionar um problema empírico, comumente enfrentado pelos planejadores que tratam de municípios brasileiros de médio porte. O planejamento do sistema de transporte urbano e regional requer unidades administrativas ou uma proposta de zoneamento, usualmente definida em planos diretores, que nem sempre estão disponíveis. Os resultados consistem na delimitação e na caracterização de cada uma das unidades espaciais aplicadas no município de Petrópolis, localizado no Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Destaca-se sua viabilidade de aplicação, inclusive para outros municípios com abairramento indefinido.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Scabelo da Costa Pereira da Silva Lemos & Licínio da Silva Portugal & Ronaldo Balassiano, 2020. "Procedimento metodológico para determinação de unidades espaciais de análise intra municipais: contribuição ao planejamento de transporte em municípios com abairramento indefinido," RPER, Associação Portuguesa para o Desenvolvimento Regional, issue 54, pages 53-67, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:apd:rper00:y:2020:i:54:id:174
    DOI: 10.59072/rper.vi54.174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.review-rper.com/index.php/rper/article/view/174
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.review-rper.com/index.php/rper/article/download/174/96
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.59072/rper.vi54.174?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vickerman, R., 2000. "Evaluation methodologies for transport projects in the United Kingdom," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 7-16, January.
    2. Vickerman, Roger, 1995. "Location, accessibility and regional development: the appraisal of trans-European networks," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 225-234, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meng, Xuechen & Lin, Shanlang & Zhu, Xiaochuan, 2018. "The resource redistribution effect of high-speed rail stations on the economic growth of neighbouring regions: Evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 178-191.
    2. Olsson, Jerry, 2009. "Improved road accessibility and indirect development effects: evidence from rural Philippines," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 476-483.
    3. Mohíno, Inmaculada & Ureña, José M. & Solís, Eloy, 2016. "Transport infrastructure and territorial cohesion in rural metro-adjacent regions: A multimodal accessibility approach. The case of Castilla-La Mancha in the context of Madrid (Spain)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 115-133.
    4. Shi, Jing & Zhou, Nian, 2012. "A quantitative transportation project investment evaluation approach with both equity and efficiency aspects," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 93-100.
    5. Polydoropoulou, Amalia & Roumboutsos, Athena, 2009. "Evaluating the impact of decision making during construction on transport project outcome," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 369-380, November.
    6. Angel Alanón & Josep Maria Arauzo Carod, "undated". "Accessibility and Industrial Location. Some Evidence from Spain," Studies on the Spanish Economy 214, FEDEA.
    7. Arkadiusz Malkowski & Agnieszka Malkowska, 2018. "Container Terminal As An Opportunity For Development Of The Peripheral Area," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 18, pages 389-403.
    8. Metaxas, Theodore & Economou, Athina, 2012. "Assessing the determinants of Firms’ Competitiveness in Greece: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis," MPRA Paper 42794, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Cundric, A. & Kern, T. & Rajkovic, V., 2008. "A qualitative model for road investment appraisal," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 225-231, July.
    10. Hugo Priemus & Marian Bosch-Rekveldt & Mendel Giezen, 2013. "Dealing with the complexity, uncertainties and risk of megaprojects: redundancy, resilience and adaptivity," Chapters, in: Hugo Priemus & Bert van Wee (ed.), International Handbook on Mega-Projects, chapter 5, pages 83-110, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. MacKellar, Landis & Woergoetter, Andreas & Woerz, Julia, 2000. "Economic Development Problems of Landlocked Countries," Transition Economics Series 14, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    12. Zhu, Jingjing & Xu, Xiangdong & Wang, Zijian, 2023. "Economic evaluation of redundancy design for transportation networks under disruptions: Framework and case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 70-83.
    13. Roberts, Mark & Deichmann, Uwe & Fingleton, Bernard & Shi, Tuo, 2010. "On the road to prosperity ? The economic geography of China's national expressway network," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5479, The World Bank.
    14. Louw, Erik & Leijten, Martijn & Meijers, Evert, 2013. "Changes subsequent to infrastructure investments: Forecasts, expectations and ex-post situation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 107-117.
    15. Junn-Yuan Teng & Wen-Chih Huang & Maw-Cherng Lin, 2010. "Systematic budget allocation for transportation construction projects: a case in Taiwan," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 331-361, March.
    16. Banister, David & Thurstain-Goodwin, Mark, 2011. "Quantification of the non-transport benefits resulting from rail investment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 212-223.
    17. Pokharel, Ramesh & Bertolini, Luca & te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Acharya, Surya Raj, 2021. "Spatio-temporal evolution of cities and regional economic development in Nepal: Does transport infrastructure matter?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    18. Banister, David & Maggi, Rico & Nijkamp, Peter, 1998. "Actors and factors in the integration of strategic infrastructure networks in Europe," Serie Research Memoranda 0025, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    19. Halden, Derek, 2002. "Using accessibility measures to integrate land use and transport policy in Edinburgh and the Lothians," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 313-324, October.
    20. Thomopoulos, N. & Grant-Muller, S. & Tight, M.R., 2009. "Incorporating equity considerations in transport infrastructure evaluation: Current practice and a proposed methodology," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 351-359, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apd:rper00:y:2020:i:54:id:174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elisabete Martins (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.review-rper.com/index.php/rper .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.