IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ahc/journl/y2021id1584.html

The role of science in overcoming modern global crises

Author

Listed:
  • E. V. Kozhatkina

Abstract

The article analyzes the views of researchers on the problem of global crises and the role of science in solving them. The system «world–man» has been studied. The publication touches upon the topic of the anthropogenic beginning of global crises. Particular attention is paid to environmental global crises. In conclusion, the significance of science in the system of overcoming global crises is revealed.

Suggested Citation

  • E. V. Kozhatkina, 2021. "The role of science in overcoming modern global crises," Entrepreneur’s Guide, JSC “Publishing Agency “Science and Educationâ€, vol. 14(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:ahc:journl:y:2021:id:1584
    DOI: 10.24182/2073-9885-2021-14-4-119-125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pp-mag.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1584/1554
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24182/2073-9885-2021-14-4-119-125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Bloom & Charles I. Jones & John Van Reenen & Michael Webb, 2020. "Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(4), pages 1104-1144, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magnus Henrekson & Dan Johansson & Johan Karlsson, 2024. "To Be or Not to Be: The Entrepreneur in Neo-Schumpeterian Growth Theory," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(1), pages 104-140, January.
    2. Shah, Rohan, 2025. "Boosting innovation or entry: What increases output more?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. Masami Imai & Michiru Sawada, 2022. "Does a Financial Crisis Impair Corporate Innovation?," Wesleyan Economics Working Papers 2022-002, Wesleyan University, Department of Economics.
    4. Frank R. Lichtenberg, 2019. "The long-run impact of new medical ideas on cancer survival and mortality," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(7), pages 722-740, October.
    5. Rubén Domínguez-Díaz & Samuel Hurtado & Carolina Menéndez, 2025. "Fiscal stimulus and productivity: simulating the NGEU program with an endogenous growth model," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 16(1), pages 191-228, March.
    6. Kuosmanen, Natalia & Valmari, Nelli, 2023. "Renewal of Companies Through Product Switching," ETLA Working Papers 104, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    7. Elias Dinopoulos & Constantinos Syropoulos & Theofanis Tsoulouhas, 2023. "Global Innovation Contests," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Shanchao Wang & Julian M. Alston & Philip G. Pardey, 2025. "R&D lags in economic models," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 842-862, August.
    9. Huffman, Gregory W., 2025. "The stochastic implications of autonomous creation and destruction," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. Marcus Berliant & Masahisa Fujita, 2025. "Knowledge creation through multimodal communication," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 821-890, October.
    11. Basso, Henrique S. & Jimeno, Juan F., 2021. "From secular stagnation to robocalypse? Implications of demographic and technological changes," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 833-847.
    12. Charles Ayoubi & Michele Pezzoni & Fabiana Visentin, 2021. "Does It Pay to Do Novel Science? The Selectivity Patterns in Science Funding," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(5), pages 635-648.
    13. Huang, Geng & Lin, Xi & He, Ling-Yun, 2025. "Importing intermediates from high-tech countries versus from low-tech countries: Theory and evidence from enterprise-level energy efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    14. Lutz Bornmann & Russell J. Funk, 2025. "Popper’s probability calculus and the decline of scientific disruptiveness," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(8), pages 4801-4807, August.
    15. Christos A Makridis & Andrew A Borkowski & Gil Alterovitz, 2024. "Perspectives on advancing innovation and human flourishing through a network of AI institutes," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 557-562.
    16. Ziesemer, Thomas, 2019. "Can we have growth when population is stagnant? Testing linear growth rate formulas and their cross-unit cointegration of non-scale endogenous growth models," MERIT Working Papers 2019-021, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    17. Ku Liang & Yujie Hu, 2025. "Digital Economy Development, Environmental Regulation, and Green Technology Innovation in Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-31, September.
    18. Frank W. Geels & Jonatan Pinkse & Dimitri Zenghelis, 2021. "Productivity opportunities and risks in a transformative,low-carbon and digital age," Working Papers 009, The Productivity Institute.
    19. Albert N. Link & John T. Scott, 2020. "Creativity-enhancing technological change in the production of scientific knowledge," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 489-500, July.
    20. Sabine Gralka & Klaus Wohlrabe, 2022. "Classifying top economists using archetypoid analysis," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(14), pages 1342-1346, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ahc:journl:y:2021:id:1584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.