IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7955-d1741662.html

Digital Economy Development, Environmental Regulation, and Green Technology Innovation in Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Ku Liang

    (School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110001, China)

  • Yujie Hu

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

The development of the digital economy has become a significant driving force for the innovation of green technology in the manufacturing sectors. Green technology innovation in the manufacturing sectors is not only a key engine for realizing economic green transformation and achieving the goal of achieving peak carbon emissions by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060, but also an important path for cultivating new quality productivity. Based on Schumpeter’s endogenous growth theory, in this study, we constructed an analytical model with a unified framework of digital economic development and environmental regulation, systematically explored the mechanism of digital economic development with respect to green technological innovation in the manufacturing sectors and the moderating effect of environmental regulation, and carried out empirical research based on panel data at the provincial level and the level of the subdivided manufacturing sectors in China. We found that the development of the digital economy promotes green technology innovation in the manufacturing industry. However, according to the theory of increasing marginal information costs, it shows a significant nonlinear relationship. Absorptive capacity is the key means of support that manufacturing enterprises can leverage to improve their level of green technological innovation. Environmental regulation plays a crucial role in guiding green technological innovation in the manufacturing sectors. A further heterogeneity analysis showed that the development of the digital economy exerts a stronger positive impact on green technological innovation in cleaner-production-oriented manufacturing sectors and those located in regions with more advanced financial regions and in technology-intensive industries. This study provides theoretical support for understanding the driving mechanisms of green technological innovation in the manufacturing sector against the backdrop of the digital economy, offering practical implications for optimizing environmental regulation policies and enhancing the level of green development in manufacturing.

Suggested Citation

  • Ku Liang & Yujie Hu, 2025. "Digital Economy Development, Environmental Regulation, and Green Technology Innovation in Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-31, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7955-:d:1741662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7955/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7955/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiang-Fei Ma & Ru Zhang & Yi-Fan Ruan, 2023. "How to Evaluate the Level of Green Development Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Wang, Xin & Ma, Chaoqun & Yao, Zheng, 2024. "The double-edged sword effect of digital capability on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed industrial firms," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 321-339.
    3. Arthur, W Brian, 1989. "Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(394), pages 116-131, March.
    4. Chenchen Wang & Yaobin Liu & Yongkun Wan & Sheng Hu & Haibo Xia, 2025. "How does the digital economy impact the green upgrading of manufacturing? Perspectives on technological innovation and resource allocation," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(34), pages 5049-5064, July.
    5. Hsu, Ching-Chi & Ngo, Quang-Thanh & Chien, FengSheng & Li, Li & Mohsin, Muhammad, 2021. "Evaluating green innovation and performance of financial development: mediating concerns of environmental regulation," MPRA Paper 109671, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Hansen, Bruce E., 1999. "Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 345-368, December.
    7. Katz, Michael L & Shapiro, Carl, 1985. "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 424-440, June.
    8. Ferreira, João J.M. & Fernandes, Cristina I. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F., 2020. "Technology transfer, climate change mitigation, and environmental patent impact on sustainability and economic growth: A comparison of European countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    9. Yang Chen & Guiyao Tang & Jiafei Jin & Ji Li & Pascal Paillé, 2015. "Linking Market Orientation and Environmental Performance: The Influence of Environmental Strategy, Employee’s Environmental Involvement, and Environmental Product Quality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 479-500, March.
    10. Boqiang Lin & Yongjing Xie, 2024. "Impacts of digital transformation on corporate green technology innovation: Do board characteristics play a role?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1741-1755, May.
    11. Wang, Baoyi & Khan, Inayat & Ge, Chenlu & Naz, Huma, 2024. "Digital transformation of enterprises promotes green technology innovation – The regulated mediation model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    12. Nicholas Bloom & Charles I. Jones & John Van Reenen & Michael Webb, 2020. "Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(4), pages 1104-1144, April.
    13. William Ocasio, 1997. "Towards An Attention‐Based View Of The Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(S1), pages 187-206, July.
    14. Santoalha, Artur & Consoli, Davide & Castellacci, Fulvio, 2021. "Digital skills, relatedness and green diversification: A study of European regions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    15. Rongrong Liu & Jinbo Jiang & Yun Long, 2025. "How does the digital economy affect green innovation efficiency: evidence from China," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(7), pages 1514-1540, June.
    16. Lee, Min-Jae & Kim, Yanghee & Roh, Taewoo, 2024. "Exploring the role of digital servitization for green innovation: Absorptive capacity, transformative capacity, and environmental strategy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    17. Irfan, Muhammad & Razzaq, Asif & Sharif, Arshian & Yang, Xiaodong, 2022. "Influence mechanism between green finance and green innovation: Exploring regional policy intervention effects in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shabbir, Muhammad Nadir & Linh, Duong Thuy, 2025. "Globalizing green innovation: Impact on green GDP and pathways to sustainability," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(1).
    2. Wu, Yan & Sun, Hongmin & Zhang, Lixia & Cui, Can, 2025. "Green investment and quality of economic development: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Beomjin Choi & T. S. Raghu & Ajay Vinzé & Kevin J. Dooley, 2019. "Effectiveness of standards consortia: Social network perspectives," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 405-416, April.
    4. Javier Carrillo-Hermosilla & Pablo Chafla, 2005. "IE WP 01/03 Technology transfer and sustainable development in emerging economies," Others 0509002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Alessia Berni & Mariavittoria Cicellin & Stefano Consiglio & Luigi Moschera, 2012. "The evolution of the Italian Temporary Work Agency field: A path dependence perspective," Discussion Papers 10_2012, CRISEI, University of Naples "Parthenope", Italy.
    6. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2qaasbmk6u8cj8maoa30ls1roi is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Slowak, André P., 2009. "Market fields structure & dynamics in industrial automation," FZID Discussion Papers 02-2009, University of Hohenheim, Center for Research on Innovation and Services (FZID).
    8. Dietrich, Antje-Mareike, 2016. "Governmental platform intermediation to promote alternative fuel vehicles," Economics Department Working Paper Series 16, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Economics Department.
    9. Giovanna Devetag & Enrico Zaninotto, 2001. "The imperfect hiding: Some introductory concepts and preliminary issues on modularity," ROCK Working Papers 010, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 13 Jun 2008.
    10. Wang, Lili & Pang, Jun, 2025. "Assessing the impact of climate mitigation technology and environmental tax on renewable energy development: A dynamic threshold approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    11. Jullien, Bruno, 2001. "Competing with Network Externalities and Price Discrimination," CEPR Discussion Papers 2883, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    12. Vialle, Pierre & Song, Junjie & Zhang, Jian, 2012. "Competing with dominant global standards in a catching-up context. The case of mobile standards in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 832-846.
    13. Paul W.J. de Bijl & Sanjeev Goyal, 2002. "Market Integration and Technological Change," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 19-37, March.
    14. Nesta, Lionel & Verdolini, Elena & Vona, Francesco, "undated". "Threshold Policy Effects and Directed Technical Change in Energy Innovation," CSI: Climate and Sustainable Innovation 268731, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    15. Jean-Michel Dalle, 1995. "Dynamiques d'adoption, coordination et diversité : la diffusion des standards technologiques," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 46(4), pages 1081-1098.
    16. Mingyue Xie & Suning Zhao & Kun Lv, 2024. "The Impact of Green Finance and Financial Technology on Regional Green Energy Technological Innovation Based on the Dual Machine Learning and Spatial Econometric Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-27, May.
    17. den Hartigh, E. & Langerak, F. & Commandeur, H.R., 2002. "The Effects of Self-Reinforcing Mechanisms on Firm Performance," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-46-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Lange Rense & Oliva Terence A. & McDade Sean R., 2000. "An Algorithm for Estimating Multivariate Catastrophe Models: GEMCAT II," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 1-34, October.
    19. Kogut, Bruce & Walker, Gordon & Kim, Dong-Jae, 1995. "Cooperation and entry induction as an extension of technological rivalry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 77-95, January.
    20. Song, Yang & Berger, Ron & Yosipof, Abraham & Barnes, Bradley R., 2019. "Mining and investigating the factors influencing crowdfunding success," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    21. Ian Macinnes, 1994. "A Model For Standard Setting: High Definition Television," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 12(4), pages 67-78, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7955-:d:1741662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.