Producer Biotech Food Knowledge Differences: Findings from a Three-State Survey
Over the years, public opinion in the United States on agricultural biotechnology has shifted from one of extreme consumer concern to one of indifference. This paper analyzes gender, ethnic, education, age, and household-income differences in producersÂ’' biotechnology knowledge. Mail questionnaires were used in collecting data. Responses to selected questions were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Chi-squares tests showed statistically significant differences in biotechnology knowledge among farmers who participated in the three-state survey.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Onyango, Benjamin M. & Hossain, Ferdaus & Hallman, William K. & Schilling, Brian J. & Adelaja, Adesoji O., 2003. "Public Perception Of Food Biotechnology: Uncovering Factors Driving Consumer Acceptance Of Genetically Modified Food," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 34(01), pages -, March.
- Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge & McBride, William D., 2002. "Adoption Of Bioengineered Crops," Agricultural Economics Reports 33957, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
- Medina, Carolina & House, Lisa & Schmidt, David B. & Lusk, Jayson L. & Toner, Cheryl, 2004. "U.S. Consumer Attitudes Toward Food Biotechnology," 2004 Annual Meeting, February 14-18, 2004, Tulsa, Oklahoma 34626, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:26730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.