IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ifaamr/188712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential Economic Impact of Biofortified Maize in the Indian Poultry Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Krishna, Vijesh V.
  • Erenstein, Olaf
  • Sadashivappa, Prakash
  • Vivek, B. S.

Abstract

The study examines the current feed use in the rapidly-growing Indian poultry sector and evaluates the potential economic impact of using biofortified maize with higher levels of amino acids as feed. Data collected from 185 poultry firms of South India form the empirical base. A significant share of broiler firms were found using amino acids in quantities above the recommended levels with negligible production and negative profitability effects, demonstrating a clear dearth of managerial skill to obtain and utilize information on poultry nutrition. A linear programming model for estimating the least-cost feed formulation showed that the potential economic impact of biofortified maize is limited by the availability of low-cost protein from the alternative sources, and that the potential cost savings from the technology would be marginal. Similar findings were obtained from additional estimation done by relaxing the assumption that the firms have perfect information on feed formulation. Also, lack of awareness of the small-scale firm management regarding poultry nutrition could pose additional challenges in the development of innovative maize-poultry value chains for diffusion of this innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Krishna, Vijesh V. & Erenstein, Olaf & Sadashivappa, Prakash & Vivek, B. S., 2014. "Potential Economic Impact of Biofortified Maize in the Indian Poultry Sector," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1-30, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:188712
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.188712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/188712/files/201301025.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.188712?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 2001. "Impact of Public- and Private- Sector Maize Breeding Research in Asia, 1966-1997/98," Impact Studies 7656, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    2. Darroch, Mark A.G. & Akridge, Jay T. & Boehlje, Michael, 2002. "Capturing Value In The Supply Chain: The Case Of High Oleic Acid Soybeans," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17.
    3. William W. Wilson & Bruce L. Dahl, 2011. "Grain contracting strategies: the case of durum wheat," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 344-359, June.
    4. John Miranowski & Helen H. Jensen & S. Patricia Batres-Marquez & Ariun Ishdorj, 2004. "Product Differentiation and Segregation in Agricultural Systems: Non-Genetically Modified and Specialty Corn and Soybean Crops in Iowa," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 04-wp354, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    5. Miguel Carriquiry & Bruce A. Babcock, 2002. "Can Spot and Contract Markets Co-Exist in Agriculture?," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 02-wp311, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    6. Masuda, Tadayoshi & Goldsmith, Peter D., 2009. "World Soybean Production: Area Harvested, Yield, and Long-Term Projections," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Miguel A. López-Pereira, 1993. "Economics of quality protein maize as a feedstuff," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(6), pages 557-568.
    8. Arndt, Heinz W., 1988. ""Market failure" and underdevelopment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 219-229, February.
    9. Janzen, Edward L. & Wilson, William W., 2002. "Cooperative Marketing In Specialty Grains And Identity Preserved Grain Markets," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 23558, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    10. Bharat Ramaswami & Pratap Singh Birthal & P.K. Joshi, 2005. "Efficiency and distribution in contract farming:The case of Indian poultry growers," Discussion Papers 05-01, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    11. Stein Kristiansen, 2003. "Information Asymmetry and Economic Concentration: The case of hens and eggs in eastern Indonesia," Working Papers 03-21, Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA).
    12. Kristiansen, Stein, 2003. "Information asymmetry and economic concentration: The case of hens and eggs in eastern Indonesia," ESA Working Papers 289078, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    13. Singh, R, 2001. "Impact of Public- and Private- Sector Maize Breeding Research in Asia, 1966-1997/98: An Interface in Public and Private Maize Research in India," Impact Studies 296890, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    14. Hansen, James M., 2012. "Assessing the Impact of Southeast Asia's Increasing Meat Demand on Global Feed Demand and Prices," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124683, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Pomp, Marc & Burger, Kees, 1995. "Innovation and imitation: Adoption of cocoa by Indonesian smallholders," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 423-431, March.
    16. Vivek, B.S. & Krivanek, A.F. & Palacios-Rojas, N. & Twumasi-Afriyie, S. & Diallo, Alpha O., 2008. "Breeding Quality Protein Maize (QPM): Protocols for Developing QPM Cultivars," Manuals 56179, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    17. Marsh, John M., 2007. "Cross-Sector Relationships Between the Corn Feed Grains and Livestock and Poultry Economies," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 1-22, April.
    18. Gerpacio, Roberta, 2001. "Impact of Public- and Private- Sector Maize Breeding Research in Asia, 1966-1997/98:: The Maize Economy of Asia," Impact Studies 296888, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    19. Brian Roe & Ian Sheldon, 2007. "Credence Good Labeling: The Efficiency and Distributional Implications of Several Policy Approaches," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 89(4), pages 1020-1033.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hellin, Jon & Krishna, Vijesh & Erenstein, Olaf & Boeber, Christian, 2015. "India’s Poultry Revolution: Implications for its Sustenance and the Global Poultry Trade," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(A), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Poole, Nigel & Donovan, Jason & Erenstein, Olaf, 2021. "Viewpoint: Agri-nutrition research: Revisiting the contribution of maize and wheat to human nutrition and health," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Raghu, Prabhakaran T. & Erenstein, Olaf & Böber, Christian & Krishna, Vijesh V., 2015. "Adoption and Outcomes of Hybrid Maize in the Marginal Areas of India," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 54(2), pages 1-26, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evans, Lewis & Meade, Richard, 2005. "The Role and Significance of Cooperatives in New Zealand Agriculture, A Comparative Institutional Analysis," Working Paper Series 3847, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    2. Frank Kutka, 2011. "Open-Pollinated vs. Hybrid Maize Cultivars," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(9), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Raju Ghimire & Wen-Chi Huang, 2015. "Household wealth and adoption of improved maize varieties in Nepal: a double-hurdle approach," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 7(6), pages 1321-1335, December.
    4. Pingali, P. L. & Traxler, G., 2002. "Changing locus of agricultural research: will the poor benefit from biotechnology and privatization trends?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 223-238, June.
    5. repec:vuw:vuwscr:18942 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Stein Kristiansen, 2003. "Information Asymmetry and Economic Concentration: The case of hens and eggs in eastern Indonesia," Working Papers 03-21, Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA).
    7. Evans, Lewis & Meade, Richard, 2005. "The Role and Significance of Cooperatives in New Zealand Agriculture, A Comparative Institutional Analysis," Working Paper Series 18942, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    8. Ha, Dang Thanh & Thao, Tran Dinh & Khiem, Nguyen Tri & Trieu, Mai Xuan & Gerpacio, Roberta V. & Pingali, Prabhu L., 2004. "Maize in Vietnam: Production Systems, Constraints, and Research Priorities," Maize Production Systems Papers 7651, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    9. Henseler, Martin & Piot-Lepetit, Isabelle & Ferrari, Emanuele & Mellado, Aida Gonzalez & Banse, Martin & Grethe, Harald & Parisi, Claudia & Hélaine, Sophie, 2013. "On the asynchronous approvals of GM crops: Potential market impacts of a trade disruption of EU soy imports," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 166-176.
    10. Bimbo, Francesco & Bonanno, Alessandro & Viscecchia, Rosaria, 2019. "An empirical framework to study food labelling fraud: an application to the Italian extra-virgin olive oil market," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(4), October.
    11. Samia Ayyub & Xuhui Wang & Muhammad Asif & Rana Muhammad Ayyub, 2018. "Antecedents of Trust in Organic Foods: The Mediating Role of Food Related Personality Traits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Ashish Aman Sinha & Hari Charan Behera & Ajit Kumar Behura & Braja Bandhu Swain, 2021. "Land Allocation Choice in Both Contract and Non-Contract Farming: A Study of Potato Growers in West Bengal, India," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    13. Charalampia N. Anastasiou & Kiriaki M. Keramitsoglou & Nikos Kalogeras & Maria I. Tsagkaraki & Ioanna Kalatzi & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis, 2017. "Can the “Euro-Leaf” Logo Affect Consumers’ Willingness-To-Buy and Willingness-To-Pay for Organic Food and Attract Consumers’ Preferences? An Empirical Study in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Mehta, Rajesh & Narrod, Clare & Tiongco, Marites, 2008. "Livestock industrialization, trade and social-health-environment impacts in developing countries: a case of Indian poultry sector," MPRA Paper 32678, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Roy, Devesh & Thorat, Amit, 2008. "Success in High Value Horticultural Export Markets for the Small Farmers: The Case of Mahagrapes in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 1874-1890, October.
    16. Pandit, Arun & Pandey, N.K. & Rana, Rajesh K. & Lal, Barsati, 2009. "An Empirical Study of Gains from Potato Contract Farming," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 64(3), pages 1-12.
    17. Yokessa, Maïmouna & Marette, Stéphan, 2019. "A Review of Eco-labels and their Economic Impact," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 13(1-2), pages 119-163, April.
    18. Erica L. Plambeck & Terry A. Taylor, 2019. "Testing by Competitors in Enforcement of Product Standards," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1735-1751, April.
    19. Huffman, Wallace E., 2010. "Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods: Traits, Labels and Diverse Information," Working Papers 93168, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    20. , Aisdl, 2019. "The role and impact methods of state on economic in transition period," OSF Preprints smybz, Center for Open Science.
    21. Tharakan, Joe & Lefèvre, Mélanie, 2011. "Intermediaries, transport costs and interlinked transactions," CEPR Discussion Papers 8615, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:188712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifamaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.