IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v3y2011i9p1531-1554d14082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open-Pollinated vs. Hybrid Maize Cultivars

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Kutka

    (Northern Plains Sustainable Agriculture Society Farm Breeding Club, P.O. Box 194, 100 1st Ave. SW LaMoure, ND 58458, USA)

Abstract

The history of maize breeding methods in the USA is reviewed to examine the question of types of maize cultivars in sustainable agriculture. The yield potential of OP cultivars was much higher than national average yields prior to 1930, but hybrid cultivars today often out-yield OP cultivars by 50–100% or more. However, rates of gain for yield using recurrent selection on populations appear equal to that recorded for commercial hybrid breeding. The inbred-hybrid method, while successful, was not “the only sound basis” for maize improvement, as evidenced by later experiences in the United States and worldwide. It appears that maize breeders have practiced objective science and achieved concrete goals, although personal interests and goals clearly direct the work at times. As society looks for tools for sustainability based on achieving multiple goals, a special dedication to scientific validation and broad objectivity may be required. The potential for OP cultivars today is evaluated and research questions are identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Kutka, 2011. "Open-Pollinated vs. Hybrid Maize Cultivars," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(9), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:3:y:2011:i:9:p:1531-1554:d:14082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1531/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1531/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 2001. "Impact of Public- and Private- Sector Maize Breeding Research in Asia, 1966-1997/98," Impact Studies 7656, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    2. Youyong Zhu & Hairu Chen & Jinghua Fan & Yunyue Wang & Yan Li & Jianbing Chen & JinXiang Fan & Shisheng Yang & Lingping Hu & Hei Leung & Tom W. Mew & Paul S. Teng & Zonghua Wang & Christopher C. Mundt, 2000. "Genetic diversity and disease control in rice," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6797), pages 718-722, August.
    3. Gerpacio, Roberta, 2001. "Impact of Public- and Private- Sector Maize Breeding Research in Asia, 1966-1997/98:: The Maize Economy of Asia," Impact Studies 296888, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    4. David Cleveland, 2001. "Is plant breeding science objective truth or social construction? The case of yield stability," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 18(3), pages 251-270, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fischer, Klara, 2016. "Why new crop technology is not scale-neutral—A critique of the expectations for a crop-based African Green Revolution," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1185-1194.
    2. Lampach, Nicolas & To-The, Nguyen & Nguyen-Anh, Tuan, 2021. "Technical efficiency and the adoption of multiple agricultural technologies in the mountainous areas of Northern Vietnam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pingali, P. L. & Traxler, G., 2002. "Changing locus of agricultural research: will the poor benefit from biotechnology and privatization trends?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 223-238, June.
    2. Soleri, Daniela & Cleveland, David A. & Glasgow, Garrett & Sweeney, Stuart H. & Cuevas, Flavio Aragón & Fuentes, Mario R. & Ríos L., Humberto, 2008. "Testing assumptions underlying economic research on transgenic food crops for Third World farmers: Evidence from Cuba, Guatemala and Mexico," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 667-682, November.
    3. Raju Ghimire & Wen-Chi Huang, 2015. "Household wealth and adoption of improved maize varieties in Nepal: a double-hurdle approach," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 7(6), pages 1321-1335, December.
    4. Ha, Dang Thanh & Thao, Tran Dinh & Khiem, Nguyen Tri & Trieu, Mai Xuan & Gerpacio, Roberta V. & Pingali, Prabhu L., 2004. "Maize in Vietnam: Production Systems, Constraints, and Research Priorities," Maize Production Systems Papers 7651, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    5. Krishna, Vijesh V. & Erenstein, Olaf & Sadashivappa, Prakash & Vivek, B. S., 2014. "Potential Economic Impact of Biofortified Maize in the Indian Poultry Sector," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1-30, November.
    6. Nian-Feng Wan & Liwan Fu & Matteo Dainese & Yue-Qing Hu & Lars Pødenphant Kiær & Forest Isbell & Christoph Scherber, 2022. "Plant genetic diversity affects multiple trophic levels and trophic interactions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. MARCHAND, Sébastien & GUO, Huanxiu, 2014. "The environmental efficiency of non-certified organic farming in China: A case study of paddy rice production," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 201-216.
    8. Stefan Baumgärtner & Martin F. Quaas, 2007. "Agro-biodiversity as natural insurance and the development of financial insurance markets," Working Paper Series in Economics 61, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    9. Kwikiriza, Norman & Katungi, Enid & Horna, Daniela, 2011. "Estimating the role of spatial varietal diversity on crop productivity within an abatement framework: The case of banana in Uganda," IFPRI discussion papers 01051, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Odette D. Weedon & Maria R. Finckh, 2019. "Heterogeneous Winter Wheat Populations Differ in Yield Stability Depending on their Genetic Background and Management System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Wenjiang Jing & Hao Wu & Hanzhu Gu & Zhilin Xiao & Weilu Wang & Weiyang Zhang & Junfei Gu & Lijun Liu & Zhiqin Wang & Jianhua Zhang & Jianchang Yang & Hao Zhang, 2022. "Response of Grain Yield and Water Use Efficiency to Irrigation Regimes during Mid-Season indica Rice Genotype Improvement," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Stefan Baumgärtner & Martin F. Quaas, 2010. "Managing increasing environmental risks through agrobiodiversity and agrienvironmental policies," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(5), pages 483-496, September.
    13. Peng Zhang & Huize Ren & Xiaobin Dong & Xuechao Wang & Mengxue Liu & Ying Zhang & Yufang Zhang & Jiuming Huang & Shuheng Dong & Ruiming Xiao, 2023. "Understanding and Applications of Tensors in Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Manas River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, February.
    14. Shahril Ab Razak & Nor Helwa Ezzah Nor Azman & Rahiniza Kamaruzaman & Shamsul Amri Saidon & Muhammad Fairuz Mohd Yusof & Siti Norhayati Ismail & Mohd Azwan Jaafar & Norzihan Abdullah, 2020. "Genetic diversity of released Malaysian rice varieties based on single nucleotide polymorphism markers," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 62-70.
    15. Kiros Hadgu & Walter Rossing & Lammert Kooistra & Ariena Bruggen, 2009. "Spatial variation in biodiversity, soil degradation and productivity in agricultural landscapes in the highlands of Tigray, northern Ethiopia," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 1(1), pages 83-97, February.
    16. McGuire, Shawn J., 2008. "Path-dependency in plant breeding: Challenges facing participatory reforms in the Ethiopian Sorghum Improvement Program," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 96(1-3), pages 139-149, March.
    17. Papaïx, Julien & Touzeau, Suzanne & Monod, Hervé & Lannou, Christian, 2014. "Can epidemic control be achieved by altering landscape connectivity in agricultural systems?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 284(C), pages 35-47.
    18. Chen, Shiliang & Liu, Xiang & He, Qiang & Zhou, Shurong, 2022. "Higher-order interactions on disease transmission can reverse the dilution effect or weaken the amplification effect to unimodal pattern," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 474(C).
    19. Dedeurwaerdere, Tom & Hannachi, Mourad, 2019. "Socio-economic drivers of coexistence of landraces and modern crop varieties in agro-biodiversity rich Yunnan rice fields," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 177-188.
    20. Bai, Wei & Sun, Zhanxiang & Zheng, Jiaming & Du, Guijuan & Feng, Liangshan & Cai, Qian & Yang, Ning & Feng, Chen & Zhang, Zhe & Evers, Jochem B. & van der Werf, Wopke & Zhang, Lizhen, 2016. "Mixing trees and crops increases land and water use efficiencies in a semi-arid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 281-290.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:3:y:2011:i:9:p:1531-1554:d:14082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.