IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/404299.html

The impact of digital transformation and technological upgrading on corporate efficiency: evidence from Chinese agricultural processing companies

Author

Listed:
  • Stoyanets, Nataliya
  • Zongyao, Ma
  • Xue, Jingjing
  • Mohylna, Liudmyla
  • Kharchenko, Viacheslav

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to empirically assess the impact of digital transformation (DT) on corporate efficiency in China’s agricultural processing industry; to identify the masking effect of technological upgrading (TeUp) in the DT-performance nexus; and to clarify the moderating role of ownership structure (state, private, foreign) in the these relationships. Methodology. This study adopts a fixed-effects model to conduct an empirical analysis using a balanced panel dataset of 1376 Chinese agricultural processing firms spanning the period from 2019 to 2024. Stepwise regression combined with the Sobel test is used to verify the masking effect of TeUp. Grouped regression and the Chow test are applied to analyse ownership heterogeneity. Endogeneity and robustness are tested via lagged regression and variable substitution. Results. DT exerts a significant positive impact on the performance of agricultural processing enterprises, with a 1-unit increase in DT index raising Tobin’s Q by 1.6%. TeUp presents a significant masking effect: DT suppresses R&D input in the short term, whereas long-term R&D accumulation significantly enhances performance. The performance-enhancing effect of DT follows the order of foreign-owned > private > state-owned enterprises, with private firms demonstrating the most pronounced TeUp-driven performance conversion. The above conclusions are verified to be robust via endogeneity and robustness tests. Originality. This study focuses on the agricultural processing industry, unlike previous approaches that centred on the manufacturing sector as a whole. For the first time, it verifies the masking effect of TeUp in the DT-performance nexus of agricultural processing firms. Furthermore, it systematically examines the heterogeneous effects across three ownership structures and reveals the supply chain resilience value of DT during the pandemic period. Practical implications. The study proposes differentiated digital transformation strategies for agricultural processing firms of different ownership types; offers empirical evidence for the precise formulation of agricultural industrial digitalisation policies under China’s Rural Revitalisation Strategy; provides guidance for these firms to balance resource allocation between digital transformation and R&D investment; and serves as a reference for improving the digital infrastructure and digital supervision system within the agricultural processing industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Stoyanets, Nataliya & Zongyao, Ma & Xue, Jingjing & Mohylna, Liudmyla & Kharchenko, Viacheslav, 2026. "The impact of digital transformation and technological upgrading on corporate efficiency: evidence from Chinese agricultural processing companies," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 12(2), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:404299
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404299/files/8_Stoyanets_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorenzo Caprio & Silvia Rigamonti & Andrea Signori, 2020. "Legal origin, financial development, and innovation: evidence from large public and private firms in the U.S. and Europe," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(4), pages 905-925, December.
    2. Jing Ma & Huaichao Chen & Kai Wang & Yifan Ma, 2025. "Research on the Impact of Digital Transformation on Carbon Performance of Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, June.
    3. Chang-Yang Lee, 2003. "A simple theory and evidence on the determinants of firm R&D," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(5), pages 385-395.
    4. Richard J. Sexton & Tian Xia, 2018. "Increasing Concentration in the Agricultural Supply Chain: Implications for Market Power and Sector Performance," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 229-251, October.
    5. Sprong, Niels & Driessen, Paul H. & Hillebrand, Bas & Molner, Sven, 2021. "Market innovation: A literature review and new research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 450-462.
    6. Christopher B. Barrett & Thomas Reardon & Johan Swinnen & David Zilberman, 2022. "Agri-food Value Chain Revolutions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 60(4), pages 1316-1377, December.
    7. Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham & Isaac Sorkin & Henry Swift, 2020. "Bartik Instruments: What, When, Why, and How," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(8), pages 2586-2624, August.
    8. Rui-qi Li & Haiying Ma & Xinyue Wang, 2024. "The Impact of Digital Transformation on Total Factor Productivity of Enterprises," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(4), pages 1-31, July.
    9. Guan, JianCheng & Yam, Richard C.M., 2015. "Effects of government financial incentives on firms’ innovation performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 273-282.
    10. John Kenneth Galbraith & Murray L. Weidenbaum & Charles H. Hession & Barbara Deckard & Howard Sherman & Carey C. Thompson, 1975. "Economics and the Public Purpose," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 87-100, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ragasa, Catherine & Spielman, David & Lynam, John, 2025. "Agricultural innovation frames, policies, and instruments: evolution, lessons, and future research," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Tabe-Ojong, Martin Paul Jr. & Nana, Ibrahim & Zimmermann, Andrea & Jafari, Yaghoob, 2024. "Trends and evolution of global value chains in food and agriculture: Implications for food security and nutrition," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    3. Clapp, Jennifer & Vriezen, Rachael & Laila, Amar & Conti, Costanza & Gordon, Line & Hicks, Christina & Rao, Nitya, 2025. "Corporate concentration and power matter for agency in food systems," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Yu, Hong & Zhang, Muyang & Zhu, Ruolu, 2025. "A reevaluation on the effectiveness of subsidies on firm's innovation: Evidence from newly categorized subsidy data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    5. Yingjie Xu & Bingchao Zheng & Baojie Guo, 2025. "How Do Industrial Robots Affect the Total Factor Productivity in Manufacturing Enterprises?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(4), pages 14057-14093, October.
    6. Crown, Daniel & Faggian, Alessandra & Corcoran, Jonathan, 2020. "Foreign-Born graduates and innovation: Evidence from an Australian skilled visa program✰,✰✰,★,★★," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(9).
    7. Xu, Ru-Yu & Wang, Ke-Liang & Miao, Zhuang, 2024. "The impact of digital technology innovation on green total-factor energy efficiency in China: Does economic development matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    8. Tianchu Feng & Andrea Appolloni & Jiayu Chen, 2024. "How does corporate digital transformation affect carbon productivity? Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 31425-31445, December.
    9. Tan, Na & Liang, Xiaojun & Chang, Liang, 2024. "Growing older and growing technologically backward? Population ageing and high-technology exports of 171 countries," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    10. Wei Chen & Zaiyan Wei & Karen Xie, 2022. "The Battle for Homes: How Does Home Sharing Disrupt Local Residential Markets?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8589-8612, December.
    11. Olivier Bargain & Victor Stephane & Jérôme Valette, 2022. "Another brick in the wall. Immigration and electoral preferences: Direct evidence from state ballots," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 1452-1477, November.
    12. Lukáš Čechura & Tinoush Jamali Jaghdani, 2021. "Market Imperfections within the European Wheat Value Chain: The Case of France and the United Kingdom," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Francesco Campo & Mariapia Mendola & Andrea Morrison & Gianmarco Ottaviano, "undated". "Immigrant Inventors and Diversity in the Age of Mass Migration," Development Working Papers 464, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano.
    14. Fang, Mingyue & Nie, Huihua & Shen, Xinyi, 2023. "Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    15. Dany Bahar & Hillel Rapoport & Riccardo Turati, 2019. "Does Birthplace Diversity Affect Economic Complexity ? Cross-Country Evidence," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2019020, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    16. Ma, Meilin & Delgado, Michael S. & Wang, H. Holly, 2024. "Risk, arbitrage, and spatial price relationships: Insights from China's hog market under the African Swine Fever," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    17. Jakub Grossmann & Stepan Jurajda, 2023. "Voting under Debtor Distress," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp744, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    18. Caballero, María Esther & Cadena, Brian C. & Kovak, Brian K., 2023. "The international transmission of local economic shocks through migrant networks," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    19. Exbrayat, Nelly & Stephane, Victor, 2025. "Does urbanization cause crime? Evidence from rural–urban migration in South Africa," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    20. Lídia Farré & Francesco Fasani & Hannes Mueller, 2018. "Feeling useless: the effect of unemployment on mental health in the Great Recession," IZA Journal of Labor Economics, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-34, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:404299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.