IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aieabj/361318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do agroholdings cope better with the agency problem? Empirical evidence from corporate farms in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Tleubayev, Alisher
  • Syzdykov, Yerzhan

Abstract

The agricultural industry in Russia demonstrated a notable growth since 2010. Russian policymakers strive to further increase agricultural production and set new targets for the industry for the years ahead. While agroholdings are regarded as one of the main driving forces behind the recent success in the agricultural sector, they are also believed to be the main locomotive that will move agriculture towards the set goals. In spite of their growing importance, the literature on agroholdings is still relatively immature and fails to provide clear evidence of their financial efficiency as opposed to non-agroholding farms. The current study utilizes a manually sourced longitudinal dataset of 203 corporate farms in Russia and provides a new empirical evidence on the financial performance of agroholding farms through the prism of an agency problem. Our findings reveal a significant positive relationship between agro-holding membership and financial performance, as indicated by two accounting indi-cators – return on assets (ROA) and return on sales (ROS). We further observe that agroholdings face lower agency costs, which to a certain extent, explain their higher financial performance compared to stand-alone farms. The study offers empirical rec-ommendations for policymakers and corporate executives in the Russian agricultural sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Tleubayev, Alisher & Syzdykov, Yerzhan, 2025. "Do agroholdings cope better with the agency problem? Empirical evidence from corporate farms in Russia," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 14(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aieabj:361318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/361318/files/W00119_37-47_03-16199-Tleubayev.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen K. Wegren & Christel Elvestad, 2018. "Russia’s food self-sufficiency and food security: an assessment," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 565-587, September.
    2. Oane Visser & Max Spoor & Natalia Mamonova, 2014. "Is Russia the Emerging Global ‘Breadbasket’? Re-cultivation, Agroholdings and Grain Production," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(10), pages 1589-1610, November.
    3. Chrisostomos Florackis, 2008. "Agency costs and corporate governance mechanisms: evidence for UK firms," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(1), pages 37-59, January.
    4. Kevin Campbell & Antonio Mínguez-Vera, 2008. "Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 435-451, December.
    5. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. "A Survey of Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-783, June.
    6. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    7. Chrisostomos Florackis, 2008. "Agency costs and corporate governance mechanisms: evidence for UK firms," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(1), pages 37-59, January.
    8. Chaddad, Fabio & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2017. "Agency costs and organizational architecture of large corporate farms: evidence from Brazil," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 201-220.
    9. Sajid, Gul & Muhammad, Sajid & Nasir, Razzaq & Farman, Afzal, 2012. "Agency cost, corporate governance and ownership structure: the case of Pakistan," MPRA Paper 42418, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Yermack, David, 1996. "Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 185-211, February.
    11. Gagalyuk, Taras & Kovalova, Maryna, 2024. "Digital technologies as a driver of resilience and institutional transformation: The case of Ukrainian agroholdings," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(1), pages 5-25.
    12. Debrah, Godwin & Adanu, Kwami, 2022. "Does the Inverse Farm Size-Productivity Hypothesis Hold Beyond Five Hectares? Evidence from Ghana," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(3), pages 548-559, August.
    13. Chrisostomos Florackis, 2008. "Agency costs and corporate governance mechanisms: evidence for UK firms," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(1), pages 37-59, January.
    14. Uzun, Vasily & Shagaida, Natalya & Lerman, Zvi, 2019. "Russian agriculture: Growth and institutional challenges," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 475-487.
    15. Tleubayev, Alisher & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Götz, Linde, 2022. "Agricultural policies and technical efficiency of wheat production in Kazakhstan and Russia: Evidence from a stochastic frontier approach," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 54(3), pages 407-421.
    16. Tleubayev, Alisher & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Götz, Linde, 2022. "Agricultural Policies and Technical Efficiency of Wheat Production in Kazakhstan and Russia: Evidence from a Stochastic Frontier Approach," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(3), pages 407-421, August.
    17. Hermans, Frans & Chaddad, Fabio & Gagalyuk, Taras & Senesi, Sebastián & Balmann, Alfons, 2017. "The emergence and proliferation of agroholdings and mega farms in a global context," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 175-186.
    18. Liu, Yu & Wei, Zuobao & Xie, Feixue, 2014. "Do women directors improve firm performance in China?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 169-184.
    19. Kun Wang & Greg Shailer, 2015. "Ownership Concentration And Firm Performance In Emerging Markets: A Meta-Analysis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 199-229, April.
    20. Hung Quang Doan & Francesca Masciarelli & Andrea Prencipe & Nam Hoang Vu, 2023. "Social capital and firm performance in transition economies," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(4), pages 751-780, December.
    21. Vasily Uzun & Natalya Shagaida & Zvi Lerman, 2021. "Russian agroholdings and their role in agriculture," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(8), pages 1035-1055, November.
    22. Daniel Hoechle, 2007. "Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 7(3), pages 281-312, September.
    23. Tleubayev, Alisher & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Gagalyuk, Taras & Glauben, Thomas, 2022. "Business group affiliation and financial performance in the agricultural sector of transition economies: The case of Russian agroholdings," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(2), pages 280-310.
    24. Rafael E. De Hoyos & Vasilis Sarafidis, 2006. "Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 6(4), pages 482-496, December.
    25. Adams, Renée B. & Ferreira, Daniel, 2009. "Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 291-309, November.
    26. Black, Bernard & Kim, Woochan, 2012. "The effect of board structure on firm value: A multiple identification strategies approach using Korean data," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 203-226.
    27. Vivien Lefebvre, 2023. "Human resources slack and profitability: SMEs, large firms, and the role of business group affiliation," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(3), pages 611-637, September.
    28. David Epshtein & Konstantin Hahlbrock & Jürgen Wandel, 2013. "Why are agroholdings so pervasive in Russia's Belgorod oblast '? Evidence from case studies and farm-level data," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 59-81, March.
    29. Tleubayev, Alisher & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Gagalyuk, Taras & Glauben, Thomas, 2022. "Business group affiliation and financial performance in the agricultural sector of transition economies: The case of Russian agroholdings," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 27(2), pages 280-310.
    30. Andriy Matyukha & Peter Voigt & Axel Wolz, 2015. "Agro-holdings in Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan: temporary phenomenon or permanent business form? Farm-level evidence from Moscow and Belgorod regions," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 370-394, September.
    31. Afzalur Rashid, 2015. "Revisiting Agency Theory: Evidence of Board Independence and Agency Cost from Bangladesh," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 181-198, August.
    32. Petrick, Martin, 2017. "Incentive provision to farm workers in post-socialist settings: evidence from East Germany and North Kazakhstan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 239-256.
    33. Valentinov, Vladislav & Hielscher, Stefan & Pies, Ingo, 2015. "Nonprofit organizations, institutional economics, and systems thinking," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 491-501.
    34. Krishna Reddy & Stuart Locke & Frank Scrimgeour & Abeyratna Gunasekarage, 2008. "Corporate governance practices of small cap companies and their financial performance: an empirical study in New Zealand," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1), pages 51-78.
    35. Caramanis, Constantinos & Lennox, Clive, 2008. "Audit effort and earnings management," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 116-138, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tleubayev, Alisher & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Gagalyuk, Taras & García Meca, Emma & Glauben, Thomas, 2021. "Corporate governance and firm performance within the Russian agri-food sector: does ownership structure matter?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 24(4), pages 649-668.
    2. Tleubayev, Alisher & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Gagalyuk, Taras & Glauben, Thomas, 2022. "Business group affiliation and financial performance in the agricultural sector of transition economies: The case of Russian agroholdings," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(2), pages 280-310.
    3. Tleubayev, Alisher & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Gagalyuk, Taras & Glauben, Thomas, 2020. "Board gender diversity and firm performance: Evidence from the Russian agri-food industry," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23(1), pages 35-53.
    4. Ahmad, Sardar & Ullah, Subhan & Akbar, Saeed & Kodwani, Devendra & Brahma, Sanjukta, 2024. "The impact of compliance, board committees and insider CEOs on firm survival during crisis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, September.
    6. Nguyen, Tuan & Locke, Stuart & Reddy, Krishna, 2014. "A dynamic estimation of governance structures and financial performance for Singaporean companies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-11.
    7. Đặng, Rey & Houanti, L’Hocine & Reddy, Krishna & Simioni, Michel, 2020. "Does board gender diversity influence firm profitability? A control function approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 168-181.
    8. Sardar Ahmad & Saeed Akbar & Devendra Kodwani & Anwar Halari & Syed Zubair Shah, 2023. "Compliance or non‐compliance during financial crisis: Does it matter?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2348-2366, July.
    9. Pei Chu & Mohamed Elsayed & Yousry Ahmed, 2025. "Do women in the boardroom influence foreign acquisitions' premium and outcomes? Evidence from China," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 1163-1189, April.
    10. Haroon ur Rashid Khan & Waqas Bin Khidmat & Muhammad Danish Habib & Sadia Awan, 2022. "Academic directors in board and corporate expropriation: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(2), pages 372-397, March.
    11. Franco Ernesto Rubino & Paolo Tenuta & Domenico Rocco Cambrea, 2017. "Board characteristics effects on performance in family and non-family business: a multi-theoretical approach," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(3), pages 623-658, September.
    12. Neji Al-Eid Omri & Abdulhameed Mohanna Alfaleh, 2024. "The effects of boardroom gender diversity on corporate performance: empirical evidence from a sample of European listed companies," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 86-100, April.
    13. F. Cappellieri & R. Vinciguerra & A. Ricciardi & M. Pizzo, 2025. "Independent minority directors against self-serving and manipulative practices in non- financial reporting," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 29(2), pages 453-501, June.
    14. Farooq, Muhammad Umar & Gyapong, Ernest & Gull, Ammar Ali & Usman, Muhammad & Javed, Muzhar & Tawiah, Vincent, 2025. "Do women directors influence CEO performance-induced turnover in China?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    15. Maria Fátima Ribeiro Borges & Graça Maria do Carmo Azevedo & Jonas Oliveira, 2025. "Literature review on gender diversity in top management teams of companies and its relationship with firm performance and audit quality," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 177-201, March.
    16. Sanjukta Brahma & Chioma Nwafor & Agyenim Boateng, 2021. "Board gender diversity and firm performance: The UK evidence," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 5704-5719, October.
    17. Gagalyuk, Taras & Meyers, William H. & Balmann, Alfons, . "Editorial," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(4).
    18. Gagalyuk, T., 2018. "A resilience-based rationale for farm growth: the case of Ukrainian agroholdings," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277115, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Brahmadev Panda & N. M. Leepsa, 2017. "Agency theory: Review of Theory and Evidence on Problems and Perspectives," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 10(1), pages 74-95, June.
    20. Abdelaziz Hakimi & Houssem Rachdi & Rim Ben Selma Mokni & Houda Hssini, 2018. "Do board characteristics affect bank performance? Evidence from the Bahrain Islamic banks," Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(2), pages 251-272, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aieabj:361318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aieaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.