IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adx/jssajr/v5y2024i4p115-123.html

Demographic and Socioeconomic Determinants of Environmental Prioritization over Economic Growth

Author

Listed:
  • Waqas Shair
  • Shaher Bano
  • Haleema Afzal
  • Badar-un-Nisa

Abstract

The role of individuals in prioritizing the environment over economic growth is crucial for achieving sustainable development. Individual actions, such as adopting eco-friendly habits, reducing waste, and conserving resources, collectively help mitigate pollution and environmental degradation. This study exploresthe demographic and socioeconomic determinants of prioritizing the environment overgrowth. The study uses data from the World Values Survey conducted between 2017 and 2021 across 66 countries. The logistic regression modelestimates reveal that women, never-married individuals, and urban residents are likelierto prioritize the environment, whereas men and married individuals exhibit lower likelihood. The impact of age suggestsno difference in the probability of prioritizing environment over the different age cohorts. Employment status also emerges as a significant factor, with students, wage-employed, self-employed, and retired individuals displaying a greater likelihood of prioritizing the environment than homemakers. Additionally, social class positively correlateswith environmental prioritization, with upper-middle-class individuals being moreinclined to prioritize the environment than individualsfrom lower-income groups. The income of the individuals is negatively associated with the likelihood of prioritizing the environment. These findings underscore the complex interactions between demographic and socioeconomic factors in shaping environmental attitudes. The study's findingshaveimportant implications in providing valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders to design targeted interventions that empower individuals to play an active role in fostering a sustainable future.

Suggested Citation

  • Waqas Shair & Shaher Bano & Haleema Afzal & Badar-un-Nisa, 2024. "Demographic and Socioeconomic Determinants of Environmental Prioritization over Economic Growth," Journal of Social Sciences Advancement, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 5(4), pages 115-123.
  • Handle: RePEc:adx:jssajr:v:5:y:2024:i:4:p:115-123
    DOI: 10.52223/JSSA24-050413-110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.52223/JSSA24-050413-110
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.52223/JSSA24-050413-110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torgler, Benno & Garcia-Valinas, Maria A., 2007. "The determinants of individuals' attitudes towards preventing environmental damage," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2-3), pages 536-552, August.
    2. Waqas Shair & Abdul Waheed & Muhammad Mubasher Kamran & Neelam Kubra, 2022. "Digital Divide in Pakistan: Barriers to ICT Usage among the Individuals of Pakistan," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 4(3), pages 196-204.
    3. Jean-Louis Combes & Mahamat Hamit-Haggar & Sonia Schwartz, 2018. "A multilevel analysis of the determinants of willingness to pay to prevent environmental pollution across countries," Post-Print hal-01870980, HAL.
    4. Iddisah Sulemana, 2016. "Are Happier People More Willing to Make Income Sacrifices to Protect the Environment?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 447-467, May.
    5. Axel Franzen, 2003. "Environmental Attitudes in International Comparison: An Analysis of the ISSP Surveys 1993 and 2000," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 84(2), pages 297-308, June.
    6. Darshana Rajapaksa & Moinul Islam & Shunsuke Managi, 2018. "Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Role of Public Perception in Infrastructure and the Social Factors for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Gene M. Grossman & Alan B. Krueger, 1995. "Economic Growth and the Environment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(2), pages 353-377.
    8. Joysri Acharyya, 2009. "Fdi, Growth And The Environment: Evidence From India On Co2 Emission During The Last Two Decades," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 43-58, June.
    9. Israel Debra & Levinson Arik, 2004. "Willingness to Pay for Environmental Quality: Testable Empirical Implications of the Growth and Environment Literature," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-29, February.
    10. Busayo Victor Osuntuyi & Hooi Hooi Lean, 2023. "Environmental degradation, economic growth, and energy consumption: The role of education," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 1166-1177, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shaher Bano & Waqas Shair & Haleema Afzal & Badar-un-Nisa, 2024. "Pro-Environmental Behaviors and the Prioritization of Environmental Protection over Economic Growth," Journal of Social Sciences Advancement, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 5(4), pages 137-145.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iddisah Sulemana, 2016. "Are Happier People More Willing to Make Income Sacrifices to Protect the Environment?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 447-467, May.
    2. Shaher Bano & Waqas Shair & Haleema Afzal & Badar-un-Nisa, 2024. "Pro-Environmental Behaviors and the Prioritization of Environmental Protection over Economic Growth," Journal of Social Sciences Advancement, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 5(4), pages 137-145.
    3. Benno Torgler & Maria A. Garcia-Valinas & Alison Macintyre, 2012. "Justifiability of Littering: An Empirical Investigation," Environmental Values, White Horse Press, vol. 21(2), pages 209-231, May.
    4. Mondéjar Jiménez, José & Vargas Vargas, Manuel, 2018. "Modelos de comportamiento ambiental en economía ecológica: Una revisión bibliográfica/Models of Environmental Behavior in Ecological Economics: A Literature Review," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 36, pages 309-316, Enero.
    5. Benno Torgler & María A.García-Valiñas & Alison Macintyre, 2008. "Justifiability of Littering: An Empirical Investigation," Working Papers 2008.59, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    6. Torgler, Benno & Garcia-Valinas, Maria A., 2007. "The determinants of individuals' attitudes towards preventing environmental damage," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2-3), pages 536-552, August.
    7. Benno Torgler & Maria A. Garcia-Valiñas, 2005. "The Willingness to Pay for Preventing Environmental Damage," CREMA Working Paper Series 2005-22, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    8. Ling-Yun He & Hong-Zhen Zhang, 2021. "Spillover or crowding out? The effects of environmental regulation on residents’ willingness to pay for environmental protection," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 611-630, January.
    9. Managi, Shunsuke, 2006. "Are there increasing returns to pollution abatement? Empirical analytics of the Environmental Kuznets Curve in pesticides," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 617-636, June.
    10. repec:ipg:wpaper:23 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Bartz, Sherry & Kelly, David L., 2008. "Economic growth and the environment: Theory and facts," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 115-149, May.
    12. Blankenberg, Ann-Kathrin & Alhusen, Harm, 2019. "On the determinants of pro-environmental behavior: A literature review and guide for the empirical economist," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 350, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics, revised 2019.
    13. Vainio, Annukka & Paloniemi, Riikka, 2014. "The complex role of attitudes toward science in pro-environmental consumption in the Nordic countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 18-27.
    14. Schleich, Joachim & Gassmann, Xavier & Faure, Corinne & Meissner, Thomas, 2016. "Making the implicit explicit: A look inside the implicit discount rate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 321-331.
    15. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Nasreen, Samia & Abbas, Faisal & Anis, Omri, 2015. "Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 275-287.
    16. Empora, Neophyta & Mamuneas, Theofanis P. & Stengos, Thanasis, 2020. "Output and pollution abatement in a U.S. state emission function," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 44-65, February.
    17. Song, Fei (Sophie) & Montabon, Frank & Xu, Yuhang, 2018. "The impact of national culture on corporate adoption of environmental management practices and their effectiveness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 313-328.
    18. García-Valiñas, María A. & Macintyre, Alison & Torgler, Benno, 2012. "Volunteering, pro-environmental attitudes and norms," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 455-467.
    19. Susana Ferreira & Mirko Moro, 2013. "Income and Preferences for the Environment: Evidence from Subjective Well-Being Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(3), pages 650-667, March.
    20. Tripura Sundari C. U. & Anindita Mitra, 2020. "Development and Degradation: The Nexus between GDP, FDI, and Pollution in India," Emerging Economy Studies, International Management Institute, vol. 6(1), pages 39-49, May.
    21. Udalov, Vladimir & Welfens, Paul J. J., 2017. "Digital and Competing Information Sources: Impact on Environmental Concern and Prospects for Cooperation," IZA Discussion Papers 10684, IZA Network @ LISER.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adx:jssajr:v:5:y:2024:i:4:p:115-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Muhammad Shafiq (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.scienceimpactpub.com/journals/index.php .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.