This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Citations for "Second-Sourcing as a Commitment: Monopoly Incentives to Attract Competition"

by Joseph Farrell and Nancy T. Gallini.

For a complete description of this item, click here.
Cited by (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.):
  1. Andras Niedermayer, 2005. "Does a Platform Owning Monopolist Want Competition?," Diskussionsschriften dp0517, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft. [Downloadable!]
  2. Emanuel Ornelas & John L. Turner, 2008. "Protection and International Sourcing," CEP Discussion Papers dp0900, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE. [Downloadable!]
  3. Jay Pil Choi & Marcel Thum, 1997. "Market Structure and the Timing of Technology Adoption with Network Externalities," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo Group Munich. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  4. John McLaren, 2000. ""Globalization" and Vertical Structure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(5), pages 1239-1254, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Jay Pil Choi & Marcel Thum, 1998. "The Economics of Repeated Extortion," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo Group Munich. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Philip T. Hoffman & Gilles Postel-Vinay & Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, 1994. "What do Notaries do? Overcoming Asymmetric Information in Financial Markets: The Case of Paris, 1751," UCLA Economics Working Papers 719, UCLA Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  7. Niels Krap & Johannes Stephan, 2008. "The Relationship between Knowledge Intensity and Market Concentration in European Industries: An inverted U-Shape," IWH Discussion Papers 3-08, Halle Institute for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
  8. Thomas J. Holmes & James A. Schmitz, Jr., 2001. "Competition at work : railroads vs. monopoly in the U.S. shipping industry," Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, issue Spr, pages 3-29. [Downloadable!]
  9. Stefan ARPING & Gyöngyi LÓRÁNTH, 2002. "Corporate Leverage and Product Differentiation Strategy," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'Econométrie et d'Economie politique (DEEP) 02.06, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, DEEP, revised May 2002. [Downloadable!]
  10. Hess, Mike & Ricart, Joan E., 2002. "Managing customer switching costs: A framework for competing in the networked environment," IESE Research Papers D/472, IESE Business School. [Downloadable!]
  11. Andras Niedermayer, 2006. "Does a Platform Monopolist Want Competition?," Diskussionsschriften dp0604, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft. [Downloadable!]
  12. Andrea Fosfuri, 2004. "The Licensing Dilemma: Understanding The Determinants Of The Rate Of Licensing," Business Economics Working Papers wb041507, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economía de la Empresa. [Downloadable!]
  13. Fabio M. Manenti & Ernesto Somma, 2002. "One-Way Compatibility, Two-Way Compatibility and Entry in Network Industries," Industrial Organization 0205001, EconWPA, revised 04 Oct 2002. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  14. Arping, Stefan & Lóránth, Gyöngyi, 2002. "Corporate Leverage and Product Differentiation Strategy," CEPR Discussion Papers 3451, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  15. Andrea Bonaccorsi & Paola Giuri, 1999. "Increasing returns and network structure in the evolutionary dynamics of industries," LEM Papers Series 1999/12, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy. [Downloadable!]
  16. Motta, Massimo & Rønde, Thomas, 2002. "Trade secret laws, labor mobility, and innovations," Working Papers 08-2002, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  17. Bijl, P. de, 1995. "Aftermarkets : the monopoly case," Discussion Paper 102, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
  18. Matthew T. Clements, 2002. "System Components, Network Effects, and Bundling," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 0(1). [Downloadable!]
  19. Justus Haucap, 2003. "Telephone Number Allocation: A Property Rights Approach," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 91-109, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  20. Nisvan Erkal, 2003. "Buyer-Supplier Interaction, Asset Specificity, And Product Choice," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 885, The University of Melbourne. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  21. Aidan Hollis, 1996. "Subsidizing the Competition," Working Papers ecpap-96-02, University of Toronto, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  22. Rachel E. Kranton & Deborah F. Minehart, 2001. "A Theory of Buyer-Seller Networks," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(3), pages 485-508, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  23. David A. Malueg & Marius Schwartz, . "Intercommection Incentives of a Large Network Facing Multiple Rivals," Working Papers gueconwpa~03-03-01, Georgetown University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  24. Aidan Hollis, 2002. "Strategic Implications of Learning by Doing," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 157-174, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  25. Caroline Boivin & Corinne Langinier, 2005. "Technology Licensing to a Rival," Economics Bulletin, Economics Bulletin, vol. 12(15), pages 1-8. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  26. Nicholas Economides, 1997. "Network Externalities, Complementarities, and Invitations to Enter," Industrial Organization 9701004, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Did you know? Use the JEL tree to browse through the database by subfields.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-23.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.