IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Forschungsmethoden und Erkenntnispotential Natur- und Sozialwissenschaften im Vergleich

Listed author(s):
  • Mayntz, Renate
Registered author(s):

    Alle Wissenschaften, die nachprüfbare Aussagen über reale Phänomene machen wollen, müssen in der Lage sein, diese zu erfassen. In vielen naturwissenschaftlichen Forschungsgebieten hat der ständige Fortschritt in der Mess- und Beobachtungstechnik zu einer kumulativen Wissensentwicklung geführt. In den Sozialwissenschaften hat es dagegen aufgrund der Beschaffenheit ihrer Erkenntnisobjekte nur vergleichsweise geringe technisch bedingte Fortschritte bei ihrem beobachtenden und messenden Erfassen gegeben. Hier findet der Wissensfortschritt deshalb weniger durch immer tiefenschärferes Beobachten und genaueres Messen als im Bereich der Datenauswertung und der theoretischen Interpretation statt. Dabei spielt moderne Forschungstechnik in Gestalt des Computers eine wichtige Rolle. Da der Computer auch in den Naturwissenschaften schwergewichtig bei der Auswertung empirischer Daten eingesetzt wird, hat diese Form der Forschungstechnik heute für den Erkenntnisfortschritt in Natur- und Sozialwissenschaften eine vergleichbar große Bedeutung.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies in its series MPIfG Discussion Paper with number 05/7.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 2005
    Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:057
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Paulstr. 3, 50676 Köln

    Phone: + 49 (0) 221-2767-0
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Nigel Gilbert & Andreas Pyka & Petra Ahrweiler, 2001. "Innovation Networks - a Simulation Approach," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 4(3), pages 1-8.
    2. Timur Kuran, 1989. "Sparks and prairie fires: A theory of unanticipated political revolution," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 41-74, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.