IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/20067.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Korruptionsprävention als Ordnungsproblem - Wirtschaftsethische Perspektiven für Corporate Citizenship als Integritätsmanagement

Author

Listed:
  • Pies, Ingo
  • Sass, Peter

Abstract

Dieser Beitrag interpretiert das moralische Anliegen einer wirksamen Bekämpfung von Korruption als ordnungspolitisches Problem. Er bestimmt Korruption (a) als Missbrauch einer Vertrauensbeziehung zwischen Prinzipal und Agent und (b) als Geheimhaltungsdelikt: Die an der Korruption beteiligten Akteure errichten Informationsbarrieren, die es nicht nur dem geschädigten Prinzipal, sondern insbesondere auch den Strafverfolgungsbehörden schwer machen, Korruption aufzudecken. Den Eigentümern des bestechenden Unternehmens fällt es hingegen wesentlich leichter, diese Geheimhaltung zu durchbrechen und geeignete Vorkehrungen gegen Korruption zu treffen. Deshalb besteht das ordnungspolitische Problem darin, Anreize zu setzen, damit Unternehmen sich nicht nur gegen passive Bestechung schützen, sondern vor allem auch konsequent gegen aktive Bestechung vorgehen. Die Hauptthese dieses Beitrags lautet, dass eine indirekt ansetzende Ordnungspolitik zweiter Ordnung erforderlich ist, die das Selbstregulierungspotential der Unternehmen als Corporate Citizens aktiviert und gesellschaftlich für eine effektive Korruptionsprävention in Dienst nimmt.

Suggested Citation

  • Pies, Ingo & Sass, Peter, 2006. "Korruptionsprävention als Ordnungsproblem - Wirtschaftsethische Perspektiven für Corporate Citizenship als Integritätsmanagement," Discussion Papers 2006-7, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:20067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/170269/1/dp2006-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gupta, Sanjeev & de Mello, Luiz & Sharan, Raju, 2001. "Corruption and military spending," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 749-777, November.
    2. Unknown, 1986. "Letters," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 1(4), pages 1-9.
    3. Abbink, Klaus, 2004. "Staff rotation as an anti-corruption policy: an experimental study," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 887-906, November.
    4. Rohde-Liebenau, Björn, 2005. "Whistleblowing: Beitrag der Mitarbeiter zur Risikokommunikation," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 159.
    5. Sass, Peter & Pies, Ingo, 2005. "Selbstverpflichtung als Instrument der Korruptionsprävention bei Infrastrukturprojekten," Discussion Papers 2005-4, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    6. Beckmann, Markus & Pies, Ingo, 2006. "Freiheit durch Bindung - Zur ökonomischen Logik von Verhaltenskodizes," Discussion Papers 2006-9, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    7. Lambsdorff, Johann & Nell, Mathias, 2005. "Korruption in Deutschland: Reformmaßnahmen," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 85(12), pages 783-790.
    8. Lui, Francis T, 1985. "An Equilibrium Queuing Model of Bribery," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 93(4), pages 760-781, August.
    9. Mauro, Paolo, 1998. "Corruption and the composition of government expenditure," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 263-279, June.
    10. Beckmann, Markus & Kraft, Diana & Pies, Ingo, 2006. "Freiheit durch Bindung - Zur Logik von Verhaltenskodizes," Discussion Papers 2006-3, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    11. Lien, Da-Hsiang Donald, 1986. "A note on competitive bribery games," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 337-341.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pies Ingo & Sass Peter, 2006. "Korruptionsprävention als Ordnungsproblem – Wirtschaftsethische Perspektiven für Corporate Citizenship als Integritätsmanagement / Prevention of Corruption as a Problem of Institutional Reform – An Ec," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 57(1), pages 341-370, January.
    2. Méon, Pierre-Guillaume & Weill, Laurent, 2010. "Is Corruption an Efficient Grease?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 244-259, March.
    3. Maurizio Lisciandra & Emanuele Millemaci, 2017. "The economic effect of corruption in Italy: a regional panel analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(9), pages 1387-1398, September.
    4. Andrew Hodge & Sriram Shankar & D. S. Prasada Rao & Alan Duhs, 2011. "Exploring the Links Between Corruption and Growth," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 474-490, August.
    5. Weiss, Eli & Rosenblatt, David, 2010. "Regional economic growth in Mexico : recent evolution and the role of governance," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5369, The World Bank.
    6. Verardi, Vincenzo, 2004. "Elecotral Systems and Corruption," Revista Latinoamericana de Desarrollo Economico, Carrera de Economía de la Universidad Católica Boliviana (UCB) "San Pablo", issue 3, pages 117-150, Octubre.
    7. Pierre-Guillaume Méon & Khalid Sekkat, 2005. "Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 69-97, January.
    8. Méon, Pierre-Guillaume & Weill, Laurent, 2010. "Is Corruption an Efficient Grease?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 244-259, March.
    9. Axel Dreher & Martin Gassebner, 2007. "Greasing the Wheels of Entrepreneurship? The Impact of Regulations and Corruption on Firm Entry," CESifo Working Paper Series 2013, CESifo.
    10. repec:rnp:ppaper:mn47 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Levy, Daniel, 2007. "Price adjustment under the Table: Evidence on Efficiency-Enhancing Corruption," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23(2), pages 423-447.
    12. repec:zbw:bofitp:2008_020 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. John Bennett & Matthew D. Rablen, 2021. "Bribery, hold‐up, and bureaucratic structure," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 59(3), pages 880-903, July.
    14. Harouna Sedgo & Luc Désiré Omgba, 2023. "Corruption and distortion of public expenditures: evidence from Africa," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(2), pages 419-452, April.
    15. Arjona Trujillo, Ana María, 2002. "La corrupción política: una revisión de la literatura," DE - Documentos de Trabajo. Economía. DE de021404, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    16. Gupta, Sanjeev & de Mello, Luiz & Sharan, Raju, 2001. "Corruption and military spending," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 749-777, November.
    17. Nguyen, Ngoc Anh & Doan, Quang Hung & Nguyen, Ngoc Minh & Tran-Nam, Binh, 2016. "The impact of petty corruption on firm innovation in Vietnam," MPRA Paper 71902, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Frank Bohn, 2005. "Public Investment under Ethnic Diversity and Political Uncertainty," Working Papers 200501, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    19. Ahlin, Christian & Bose, Pinaki, 2007. "Bribery, inefficiency, and bureaucratic delay," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 465-486, September.
    20. Maria Amin & Adeel Ahmed & Khalid Zaman, 2013. "The Relationship Between Corruption And Economic Growth In Pakistan — Looking Beyound The Incumbent," Oeconomics of Knowledge, Saphira Publishing House, vol. 5(3), pages 15-45, July.
    21. José García-Montalvo & Juan-José Ganuza & Roberto Burguet, 2016. "The Microeconomics of Corruption. A Review of Thirty Years of Research," Working Papers 908, Barcelona School of Economics.
    22. Tobias Zander, 2020. "Does corruption matter for FDI flows in the OECD? A gravity analysis," EIIW Discussion paper disbei280, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:20067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.