IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpit/9805006.html

Korea and the World Trade Organization: Problems and Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Robert W. McGee

    (Seton Hall University)

  • Yeomin Yoon

    (Seton Hall University)

Abstract

The World Trade Organization, which came into existence at the conclusion of the Uruguay Round, is in charge of administering a plethora of new trade rules. The main thrust of the new rules is to reduce or abolish tariffs and quotas on a wide range of products. Some tariffs and quotas were abolished immediately, but others will not be abolished, or even reduced, for several years. Unfortunately for Korea, several of Korea's major exports, especially in the area of textiles, will continue to face relatively unfavorable tariffs and quotas for many years to come, partly because of the successful efforts of protectionists to delay the implementation of tariff and quota reductions on these goods. The WTO rules also include some less obvious protectionist measures, most notably in the areas of environmental and labor standards and antidumping. Korean companies stand to be adversely affected by these hidden protectionist measures. This paper discusses some of the potentially adverse effects that WTO rules are likely to have on Korean companies and makes suggestions for reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert W. McGee & Yeomin Yoon, 1998. "Korea and the World Trade Organization: Problems and Prospects," International Trade 9805006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:9805006
    Note: Type of Document - Word 6.0 (Mac); prepared on Macintosh; to print on LaserWriter4/600PS; pages: 11 . This paper was presented at the Fifth International Conference on Korean Studies, International Society for Korean Studies, Osaka, Japan, August, 1997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/it/papers/9805/9805006.html
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/it/papers/9805/9805006.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/it/papers/9805/9805006.ps.gz
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/it/papers/9805/9805006.doc.gz
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey J. Schott, 1994. "Uruguay Round: An Assessment," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 64, January.
    2. Francois, Joseph & McDonald, Brad & Nordström, Håkan, 1994. "The Uruguay Round: A Global General Equilibrium Assessment," CEPR Discussion Papers 1067, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter G. Warr & Helal Ahammad, 1997. "Food aid, food policy and the Uruguay round: implications for Bangladesh," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15(3), pages 169-185, January.
    2. J. Mutti & R. Sampson & B. Yeung, 2000. "The effects of the Uruguay round: empirical evidence from U.S. industry," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 18(1), pages 59-69, January.
    3. Francois, Joseph & Bradley McDonald, 1996. "Liberalization and Capital Accumulation in the GTAP Model," GTAP Technical Papers 310, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    4. Michael D. Bordo & Barry Eichengreen & Douglas A. Irwin, 1999. "Is Globalization Today Really Different than Globalization a Hunderd Years Ago?," NBER Working Papers 7195, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Haaparanta, Pertti, 1998. "Regional concentration, trade, and welfare," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 445-463, July.
    6. J. David Richardson, 2000. "The WTO and market-supportive regulation: a way forward on new competition, technological and labor issues," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 82(Jul), pages 115-130.
    7. William R. Cline, 1995. "Evaluating the Uruguay Round," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 1-23, January.
    8. Ian Wooton & Maurizio Zanardi, 2002. "Trade and Competition Policy: Anti-Dumping versus Anti-trust," Working Papers 2002_6, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow, revised Oct 2002.
    9. Smith, Vincent H., 1997. "Nafta, Gatt, And Agriculture In The Northern Rockies And Great Plains," Special Reports 29175, Montana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Trade Research Center.
    10. Lovely, Mary E., 1997. "Playing by the new subsidy rules: capital subsidies as substitutes for sectoral subsidies," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3-4), pages 463-482, November.
    11. Guash, J. Luis & Rajapatirana, Sarath, 1998. "Total strangers or soul mates? - antidumping and competition policies in Latin America and the Caribbean," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1958, The World Bank.
    12. Joseph Francois, 2000. "Assessing The Results Of General Equilibriumstudies Of Multilateral Trade Negotiations," UNCTAD Blue Series Papers 3, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    13. Bouet, Antoine, 2006. "What Can the Poor Expect From Trade Liberalization? Opening the "Black Box" of Trade Modeling," MTID Discussion Papers 58575, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Hertel, Thomas W. & Bach, Christian F. & Dimaranan, Betina & Martin, Will, 1996. "Growth, globalization, and gains from the Uruguay Round," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1614, The World Bank.
    15. David Collie, 2000. "A Rationale for the WTO Prohibition of Export Subsidies: Strategic Export Subsidies and World Welfare," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 229-245, July.
    16. Lovely, Mary E., 1995. "Economic Development in a Global Context: Implications of the Uruguay Round for Federal Tax Policy," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 48(3), pages 397-407, September.
    17. Anderson, Kym, 1995. "Agricultural Competitiveness After the Uruguay Round," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(03), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Patrick Messerlin, 2015. "How open are public procurement markets?," RSCAS Working Papers 2015/89, European University Institute.
    19. Eichengreen, Barry & Odell, John, 1996. "The United States, the ITO, and the WTO: Exit Options, Agent Slack, and Presidential Leadership," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt5kx5755f, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    20. Adrian Kay & Robert Ackrill, 2008. "Institutional change in the international governance of agriculture: a revised account," NBS Discussion Papers in Economics 2008/4, Economics, Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D6 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics
    • D7 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • K2 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law
    • L5 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:9805006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: EconWPA The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask EconWPA to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.