IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa12p604.html

A Model of Stratified Production Process and Spatial Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Tatsuaki Kuroda

Abstract

In 2011, Japanese firms suffered great losses due to the Great East Japan Earthquake as well as Thailand floods. One of the reasons for their repetitive damages is that they depend on spatially dispersed supply chain. Basically, outsourcing becomes more attractive for final goods producers due to prevailing scale economy in modern machinery industries. The fragmentation of trade also works as dispersion or disintegration force as well. In addition, some firms have dispersed their plants against the risk of big earthquakes assumed around Tokyo or Nagoya (i.e., more developed metropolitan areas). In this case, however, such behavior brought about the contiguous damages for firms ironically. In the present study, we first build up a theoretical model that is able to explain the disintegration of production process over space due to scale economy or other factors of fragmentation. It is based on a multi-level Hotelling type spatial competition model in order to capture the characteristics of supply chain over space and cascade of risks. We assume a three level structure of circles. Consumers are distributed evenly over the lowest circle. On the second circle, there are final goods producers, for whom intermediate goods producers provide differentiated inputs from the top circle. Each producer can choose for a differentiated part between the integrated production in the her own plant and the disintegrated pattern where final good producers buy inputs from some intermediate goods producers located at different places. In the latter, she should pay for transport costs to buy the input though. We show recent technical tendency of some factors such as reinforced scale economy at each stage of production may provide advantages of disintegration. Once the equilibrium distribution or location of intermediate goods producers and final goods producers is determined, we evaluate it by the location risk such as earthquake. It means, for example, that firms with dispersed supply chain may be likely to suffer relatively small but often damages if location risks are evenly distributed over the space. Moreover, we could examine the optimal location of firms including location risk for a given 'utility' function of firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatsuaki Kuroda, 2012. "A Model of Stratified Production Process and Spatial Risk," ERSA conference papers ersa12p604, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa12p604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa12/e120821aFinal00606.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roberto Cardinale, 2022. "State-Owned Enterprises’ Reforms and their Implications for the Resilience and Vulnerability of the Chinese Economy: Evidence from the Banking, Energy and Telecom Sectors," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 489-514, September.
    2. Takano, Keisuke, 2019. "Does visible shock update firms' unrelated trade diversity in anticipation of future shock? Evidence from the Great East Japan Earthquake and expected Nankai Trough Earthquake," TDB-CAREE Discussion Paper Series E-2019-01, Teikoku Databank Center for Advanced Empirical Research on Enterprise and Economy, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa12p604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.