IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Small is beautiful : preferential trade agreements and the impact of country size, market share, efficiency, and trade policy

Listed author(s):
  • Schiff, Maurice

There has been a resurgence of preferential trade agreements (PTAs). This has led to renewed debate about how PTAs affect both welfare and the multilateral system. The author examines two ideas: the welfare impact of PTAs and the effect of structural and policy changes on PTAs. He asks how the PTA's effect on home-country welfare is affected by higher imports demand; the production efficiency of the partner or rest of the world; the share imported from the other partner; and the initial protection on imports from the partner. There are several findings. An individual country benefits more from a PTA if it imports less from its partner countries. A small home country loses from forming a free trade agreement with a small partner country, but gains from forming one with the rest of the world. In other words, the home country is better off as a small member of a large bloc than as a large member of a small bloc. This result need not hold if smuggling is a factor. Home country welfare after formation of a free trade agreement (FTA) is higher when imports from the partner country are smaller, whether the partner country is large or small. Welfare worsens as imports from the partner country increase. In general a PTA is more beneficial for a country with lower import demand. A PTA is also more beneficial for a country with an efficient import-substituting sector. A small country may gain from forming a PTA when smuggling is a factor.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by The World Bank in its series Policy Research Working Paper Series with number 1668.

in new window

Date of creation: 31 Oct 1996
Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1668
Contact details of provider: Postal:
1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433

Phone: (202) 477-1234
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Richard Baldwin, 1993. "A Domino Theory of Regionalism," NBER Working Papers 4465, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  2. Rolf J. Langhammer, 1992. "The Developing Countries and Regionalism," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 211-232, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Roula I. Yazigi)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.