IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Novelty Conduits and Forms of Network Ties: To Bond or to Bridge?

  • Simone Santoni

    (Dept. of Management, University of Bologna)

  • Paolo Ferri

    (School of Business, University of Stockholm)

  • Maria Lusiani

    ()

    (Dept. of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venice)

Registered author(s):

    There is ample, cross-disciplinary evidence suggesting that network ties are key to promoting novelty. However, the network paradigm in organization and management theory offers conflicting views on what types of inter organizational ties are most valuable for organizations that are pursuing novel outcomes. Drawing on the contingent view of social capital, this study disentangles the contribution of ÔbondingÕ and ÔbridgingÕ network ties in the context of two critical conduits of novelty: new ventures and technological change. Empirical findings from a meta-analysis of 351 effect sizes nested in 67 independent samples reveals a consistent pattern of network ties-performance variations. Focusing on a two-by-two matrix that encompasses distinct conduits of novelty-new ventures and technological change-and different levels of pressures for novel outcomes-low vs. high expectation-we found two ideal profiles of network ties-context. Bridging ties are the best fit for the population of new ventures that have low pressure related to technological change. By contrast, bonding ties are more valuable for established firms for which technological change requires competition for competitive advantage. Moreover, we uncovered a pair of suboptimal equifinal designs: bonding and bridging ties are equally beneficial for the performance of new ventures that face technology-intensive environments. Surprisingly, network ties are not significantly associated with performance of established firms in less technology-intensive environments, which are typically characterized by lower pressure for novel outcomes.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://virgo.unive.it/wpideas/storage/2013wp34.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2013
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia in its series Working Papers with number 34.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 67 pages
    Date of creation: Dec 2013
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:vnm:wpdman:70
    Contact details of provider: Postal: San Giobbe, Cannaregio 873, 30121 Venezia
    Phone: +39 0412348721
    Fax: +39 0412348701
    Web page: http://www.unive.it/dip.management
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Batjargal, Bat, 2007. "Internet entrepreneurship: Social capital, human capital, and performance of Internet ventures in China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 605-618, June.
    2. Thomas Dalziel & Richard J. Gentry & Michael Bowerman, 2011. "An Integrated Agency–Resource Dependence View of the Influence of Directors' Human and Relational Capital on Firms' R&D Spending," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48, pages 1217-1242, 09.
    3. Wolfgang Viechtbauer, . "Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package," Journal of Statistical Software, American Statistical Association, vol. 36(i03).
    4. Shujun Zhang & Xinchun Li, 2008. "Managerial ties, firm resources, and performance of cluster firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 615-633, December.
    5. Lee Fleming, 2001. "Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 117-132, January.
    6. Allen, Robert C., 1983. "Collective invention," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Hsu, David H., 2007. "Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 722-741, June.
    8. Kwon, Seok-Woo & Arenius, Pia, 2010. "Nations of entrepreneurs: A social capital perspective," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 315-330, May.
    9. David Rindskopf, 1984. "Using phantom and imaginary latent variables to parameterize constraints in linear structural models," Psychometrika, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 37-47, March.
    10. Jasjit Singh & Lee Fleming, 2010. "Lone Inventors as Sources of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 41-56, January.
    11. Maurizio Sobrero & Edward B. Roberts, 2001. "The Trade-off Between Efficiency and Learning in Interorganizational Relationships for Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 493-511, April.
    12. Daniel A. Levinthal, 1997. "Adaptation on Rugged Landscapes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(7), pages 934-950, July.
    13. Jack, Sarah L., 2010. "Approaches to studying networks: Implications and outcomes," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 120-137, January.
    14. von Hippel, Eric, 1987. "Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 291-302, December.
    15. Harvey Goldstein & Min Yang & Rumana Omar & Rebecca Turner & Simon Thompson, 2000. "Meta-analysis using multilevel models with an application to the study of class size effects," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 49(3), pages 399-412.
    16. Hoang, Ha & Antoncic, Bostjan, 2003. "Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 165-187, March.
    17. Bhagavatula, Suresh & Elfring, Tom & van Tilburg, Aad & van de Bunt, Gerhard G., 2010. "How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India's handloom industry," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 245-260, May.
    18. Soh, Pek-Hooi, 2003. "The role of networking alliances in information acquisition and its implications for new product performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 727-744, November.
    19. Tsonaka, R. & Moustaki, I., 2007. "Parameter constraints in generalized linear latent variable models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4164-4177, May.
    20. Thomas Hatzichronoglou, 1997. "Revision of the High-Technology Sector and Product Classification," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 1997/2, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vnm:wpdman:70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marco LiCalzi)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.