IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Pay and Performance in the Spanish Soccer League: Who Gets the Expected Monopsony Rents?

  • Pedro Garcia-del-Barrio

    ()

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Navarra)

  • Francesc Pujol

    ()

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Navarra)

In the labour markets that gather few companies to compete for many workers, the economic theory predicts the existence of monopsony rents. It should also be the case of the Spanish soccer industry. However, the clubs of this league do not profit from the expected rents. The purpose of this paper is to explain such a contradictory evidence. Spanish soccer labour market is characterised by the presence of some outstanding workers (soccer superstars). It means that the winner-take-all hypothesis holds when analysing the soccer industry. This idea states that being slightly better than the other workers generates large earnings differentials (escalating earnings of league superstars). This paper considers the soccer industry as a dual labour market. One segment of this market could certainly be characterised by the traditional analysis of monopsony, in which a little number of clubs are willing to hire many potential candidates. The opposite occurs when studying the case of the superstar players. A number of entities (not just Spanish clubs) would fiercely compete for hiring those few superstars, who accumulate market power. The paper suggests that the monopsony rents that the clubs were to obtain from most of the soccer players, would eventually revert to the superstars, who enjoy strong bargaining power. In order to empirically test this idea, the paper analyses the data of the Spanish professional soccer league, for the season 2001/02. The analysis pays especial attention to the economic impact associated to each particular player, as far as it may help to explain the large wage differentials that could not be explained due to performance differentials.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.unav.es/facultad/econom/files/workingpapersmodule/@random437a054f974a0/1132584458_wp0504.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Navarra in its series Faculty Working Papers with number 05/04.

as
in new window

Length: 25 pages pages
Date of creation: Mar 2004
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published, Managerial and Decision Economics, 2007, vol. 28: pp. 57-70
Handle: RePEc:una:unccee:wp0504
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.unav.es/facultad/econom

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Szymanski, Stefan, 2001. "Income Inequality, Competitive Balance and the Attractiveness of Team Sports: Some Evidence and a Natural Experiment from English Soccer," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 111(469), pages F69-84, February.
  2. Rosen, Sherwin, 1981. "The Economics of Superstars," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(5), pages 845-58, December.
  3. Rosen, Sherwin & Sanderson, Allen, 2001. "Labour Markets in Professional Sports," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 111(469), pages F47-68, February.
  4. Hunt, Joseph W, Jr & Lewis, Kenneth A, 1976. "Dominance, Recontracting, and the Reserve Clause: Major League Baseball," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 66(5), pages 936-43, December.
  5. Scully, Gerald W, 1974. "Pay and Performance in Major League Baseball," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(6), pages 915-30, December.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:una:unccee:wp0504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.